Jump to content

Talk:ITIL

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


While ITIL was started in the it has since become an international standard adopted everywhere. Should the article be re-written to remove British English? I'm not sure of the arguments pro or con in this area. --Jasenlee (talk) 17:37, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No. Why would any other variety of English be more suitable? --Michig (talk) 17:46, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No; see MOS:RETAIN --hulmem (talk) 15:53, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Most of the British English has been removed from the ITIL guidance already. The exams have had all of the language specific to the UK removed for some time now. The reason is very simple, and has already been stated -- it is used around the world. Keeping British colloquialisms and UK-specific spellings of words like "whilst" makes no sense.Flybd5 (talk) 12:55, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
If you're going to remove 'British English', why not remove French or German whilst you are about it? It makes no sense, as you say, if you can write everything in American. Fustbariclation (talk) 10:59, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on ITIL. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:44, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

I have observed that Wikipedia doesn't have an article on Strategy Management for IT Services (ITSM), listed under Service Strategy Heading.
I have a good article on this topic: Strategy Management for IT Services (ITSM)
As my website is new I'm not putting the link directly in the main article. I'd request other editors to create/improve this Wikipedia article with help of the article link given below:
Strategy Management for IT Services (ITSM)
If you found the above article helpful, then please put the link in the main article as external link.--AyanBrahmachary (talk) 10:47, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ITIL v4: it seems to be "change enablement" rather than "change control"

[edit]

The article speaks about the "change control" practice in ITIL v4 and states that this name has changed compared to previous versions.

The ITIL Foundation Guide (Limited, AXELOS. ITIL Foundation: ITIL 4 Edition . The Stationery Office Ltd. Kindle Edition.) speaks about "change enablement" rather than "change control".

This may have changed during the development of v4. I'm not closely involved with the ITIL standard, so I didn't just want to make the change in the text without being sure of what really is the definitive term. Ob71 (talk) 13:42, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article about ITIL does not tell in what publication format the subject exists? Is it a book or possibly a website?

[edit]

Looking at the ITIL wikipedia page lead, it talks about compliance and trademark ownership of some practices, but if those practices are documented somewhere, it probably is a good idea to mention where such exists.

In this article: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/4/1/110 ITIL is referred as a collection of standards and the cited source in there seems to be a book published by TSO. If ITIL is a series of books containing the standards, I think it should be mentioned where it is published by whom. If it is a collection of standards published in some medium, the publication medium is pretty important information for it to be a standard.

The ITIL wikipedia page talks about who owns a trademark. Is the trademark relevant? I was not able to find the ITIL standard document itself from the website of the trademark holder, instead it is trying to sell me a course about the knowledge of the standard. According to this website: https://www.itlibrary.org/, ITIL is a book series published by "The Stationery Office". So it seems to match the cited source in this: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/4/1/110

According to my few internet searches, it seems like "ITIL is a collection of standards, published as books by TSO". But that does not match the trademark holder name PeopleCert mentioned in the article. Jimbo-dev (talk) 12:34, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

According to this random website: https://www.sysaid.com/blog/itil/everything-you-officially-need-to-know-about-itil-4 ITIL 4 is a book titled ITIL 4 Foundation. I found multiple books from my university library titled "ITIL 4 [something]", if the ITIL 4 is a collection of practices documented in different ways in those various books, the authoritative one would probably be the most relevant to mention in wikipedia. Rather than explaining what kind of certifications of knowledge there are available, it would probably be more important to first list the books containing the ITIL and its different releases.
I feel like currently this wiki page about a book series is explaining certifications and I have to have misunderstood something and my conclusion has to be wrong, right? Jimbo-dev (talk) 13:06, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I studied the matter reading this book a couple of months ago: Agutter, Claire (April 2020). ITIL Foundation Essentials ITIL 4 Edition - The ultimate revision guide, second edition. IT Governance Publishing. ISBN 9781787782150. MalikaStevenson (talk) 16:36, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]