Template talk:Db-notice

	; Archives (Index) ;
	1;
	This page is archived by ClueBot III.

Template:Db-notice is permanently protected from editing because it is a heavily used or highly visible template. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by consensus, editors may use {{edit template-protected}} to notify an administrator or template editor to make the requested edit. Usually, any contributor may edit the template's documentation to add usage notes or categories. Any contributor may edit the template's sandbox. Functionality of the template can be checked using test cases.

To help centralize discussions and keep related topics together, the talk pages of all speedy deletion ("db-name-notice") and post-deletion ("db-name-deleted") notice templates redirect here. Please specify which one(s) you're referring to in any thread you start.

Edit request 23 May 2025

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Description of suggested change: Removal of |left| and a break for better dark mode rendering
Please look at the source of this message since MediaWiki formatting goof didn't let me put it down properly in the visual editor. the 🥭 man (the 🥭 talk) 14:20, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Unit Mango: Please don't paste code blobs into the talk page. They are hard to understand and even more difficult to test. Please use the sandbox as directed above; see also WP:TESTCASES. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 19:47, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

They also break the rest of the page, so this is definitely a case of

Not done: please make your requested changes to the template's sandbox first; see WP:TESTCASES. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 19:48, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Template-protected edit request on 4 August 2025

This edit request to Template:Db-notice-multiple has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Please add support for the new G15 criterion. I tried using this template with G15 and it does not work. SuperPianoMan9167 (talk) 22:36, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Done I've added just enough code for it to work as a minimum-viable product. The template should support G15. If we want to make it fancier and have a blurb like the wizard box to show up, we should have further discussion here. Sohom (talk) 00:10, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I updated the documentation to reflect this. SuperPianoMan9167 (talk) 00:19, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Additionally param's template text needs a comma

Please change

{{<includeonly>safesubst:</includeonly>#ifeq: {{{additionally|}}}|||Additionally {{{additionally}}}}}<noinclude>

to

{{<includeonly>safesubst:</includeonly>#ifeq: {{{additionally|}}}|||Additionally, {{{additionally}}}}}<noinclude>

I did not like how I had to put an en dash in Template:Db-llm-deleted, otherwise it would have been "Additionally if you would like", which lacks a comma. The missing-comma use is seen in Template:Db-a10-notice and elsewhere. —Alalch E. 14:51, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion of draftify related template phrasing

The following discussion might be of interest to you:

Wikipedia talk:Deletion policy#Incubation and the draftify-related standardized language.

Regards, CapnZapp (talk) 13:27, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]