User talk:cyberpower678
(Redirected from User talk:Cyberbot II)
|
This user is offline, or has forgotten to update this message since starting a wikisession. (If there have been multiple edits from this user in the last 60 minutes and the most recent one wasn't to activate this template, it is safe to assume that this user forgot.) |
- Hello!! I am Cyberpower678. I am an administrator on Wikipedia. Despite that, I'm still your run of the mill user here on Wikipedia.
- I specialize in bot work and tools, but I lurk around RfPP, AfD, AIV, and AN/I, as well as RfA. If you have any questions in those areas, please feel free to ask. :-)
- For InternetArchiveBot matters specifically, please see meta:InternetArchiveBot/Problem for common issues or meta:User talk:InternetArchiveBot to leave a message
- I also serve as a mailing list moderator and account creator over at the Account Creation Center. If you have any questions regarding an account I created for you, or the process itself, feel free to email the WP:ACC team or me personally.
- At current I have helped to create accounts for 2512 different users and renamed 793 other users.
- Disputes or discussions that appear to have ended or is disputed will be archived.
All the best.—cyberpower
View my talk page Archives.
| No current discussions. Recent RfAs, recent RfBs: (successful, unsuccessful) |
archived amp urls
[edit]@GreenC and Harej: Hello. I wanted to ask you this a long time ago, but somehow it slipped my mind, and later I forgot about it. What should we do if IABot archives an amp url, and later KiranBOT updates that amp url? For example, this edit. —usernamekiran (talk) 23:20, 18 December 2025 (UTC)
- I would recommend leave the archive URL as-is. Archive URLs can get complicated and presumably the amp archive URL is working, while changing it could cause breakage. However if at some time you want to modify archive URLs let me know there is a method for checking Wayback Machine availability. -- GreenC 02:31, 19 December 2025 (UTC)
- thanks. I meant, not tinkering the archived amp url, I meant more like archiving the newly updated canonical url, and replacing that with the previous (amp) archive url - as there would be discrepancy/difference between these two URLs (newly added canonical url vs archived amp url). But as the amp url is already successfully archived, I think there is no need to update it. That is my original doubt. —usernamekiran (talk) 03:52, 19 December 2025 (UTC)