Jump to content

user talk:theleekycauldron

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Trout this user
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:GalliumBot)
abcdefgh
8
a8 black rook
b8 black knight
c8 black bishop
d8 black queen
e8 black king
f8 black bishop
g8 black knight
h8 black rook
a7 black pawn
b7 black pawn
c7 black pawn
e7 black pawn
f7 black pawn
g7 black pawn
h7 black pawn
e4 black pawn
f3 white knight
a2 white pawn
b2 white pawn
c2 white pawn
d2 white pawn
f2 white pawn
g2 white pawn
h2 white pawn
a1 white rook
b1 white knight
c1 white bishop
d1 white queen
e1 white king
f1 white bishop
h1 white rook
8
77
66
55
44
33
22
11
abcdefgh
White to move, so it's leeky's turn – check back later! (last mover: CopperyMarrow15)



Inbox

[edit]

Sometimes messages slip through the cracks. Sorry about that! I keep this list to let me know what I still need to respond to – feel free to add your own name and message here if you're still looking for a response from me.

  1. 05:04, 17 February 2025 (UTC) fill out your thing at WP:REFLECTIONS – HouseBlaster (talk • he/they)
  2. 02:17, 15 May 2025 (UTC) Make a chess move – HouseBlaster (talk • he/they)
  3. 02:51, 15 May 2025 (UTC) ban houseblaster from my talk page for messing with the inbox format theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 02:52, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Federenko - want a review?

[edit]

Hi Leeky, woukd you like a review from me? Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 16:38, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Mr Serjeant Buzfuz: I would love that! It may take me quite a bit – and also I did find a number of other sources, so boy do I have a lot of work to do to launch this to FA status. Regardless, yes, if you want to take a look I'd be incredibly grateful :) theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 03:12, 24 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Sure. Likely try to do it tomorrow. Too much cooking and red wine tonight.😉 how’s the 1L? Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 03:22, 24 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I’m working on an FA mysel. RoySmith has been very helpful. Will probably list it for PR on the weekend. I was browsing there and saw your article. Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 03:24, 24 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Mr Serjeant Buzfuz: oooh! I'm not the most active right now, but let me know when you list your article at PR and I'd be happy to take a look in return :) theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 05:54, 24 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You’ll recognise it. It was the one a couple of years ago in DYK, where there was a bit of a contretemps. Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 17:46, 24 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
And now I can't find it; don't remember the exact name, or where I came across it. Was it at FA? If you still would like it, please let me know. (Got distracted by other stuff. I"m a bit of a magpie.) Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 04:49, 5 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm a bit worried about asking...

[edit]

TLC, I have a fear of digging a hole while standing in it but I think the comment you quoted of mine is perhaps being given more scope than I intended. Do you think it would help if I clarified the scope of the statement? Springee (talk) 17:46, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Springee: that'd be difficult to know without knowing how exactly you want to clarify; do you want to reach out privately? I usually talk by email and discord. theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 17:50, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'll email you later today. Thanks Springee (talk) 17:55, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
TLC, where is the correct place to clarify the scope of the editor conduct noticeboard restriction? I mean it's clear that an ANI about something not involved with is right out and an ANI filed against me (I hope not) is clearly in. I'm not sure about some areas between and a few related questions. Also, thank you for taking the time to discuss things over the past few days. If it's OK I may want to pick your brain a bit later. Springee (talk) 00:56, 9 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – October 2025

[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2025).

Administrator changes

removed

CheckUser changes

removed Vanamonde93

Arbitration

  • After a motion, arbitration enforcement page protections no longer need to be logged in the AELOG. A bot now automatically posts protections at WP:AELOG/P. To facilitate this bot, protection summaries must include a link to the relevant CT page (e.g. [[WP:CT/BLP]]), and you will receive talk page reminders if you forget to specify the contentious topic but otherwise indicate it is an AE action.