Draft:Atomic Object
Submission declined on 4 August 2025 by Bluethricecreamman (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
| Submission declined on 5 June 2025 by HilssaMansen19 (talk). This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject. This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by HilssaMansen19 2 months ago.
| |
| Submission declined on 29 March 2025 by Gheus (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject. Declined by Gheus 4 months ago. | |
Comment: see WP:INTERVIEW but they don't count as secondary to prove notability Bluethricecreamman (talk) 19:08, 4 August 2025 (UTC)
- Comment: Sounds like a promotional dictionary definition with only 3-4 line lead. Sources are not adequate either. HilssaMansen19Irien1291S • spreading wiki love ~ Message here; no calls 11:17, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
| Company type | Private |
|---|---|
| Industry | Custom software |
| Founded | 2001 in Grand Rapids, Michigan |
| Founder | Carl Erickson |
| Headquarters | , US |
Number of locations | 4 offices (2025) |
| Website | atomicobject.com |
Atomic Object is an American custom software development consultancy. The company is employee-owned[1] and was founded in 2001 by Carl Erickson[2] in Grand Rapids, Michigan.[3][4]
Media coverage
[edit]- The New York Times (2011): Atomic Object was interviewed for an article titled, "Employers’ Unwrapped Gift: Time Off."[5]
- The Wall Street Journal (2012): Atomic Object was interviewed for an article titled, "No More Angling for the Best Seat; More Meetings Are Stand-Up Jobs."[6]
- Forbes (2021): Atomic Object was interviewed for an article titled, "What About The Dog? Getting Your Team Back To The Office Is Getting Complicated."[7]
References
[edit]- ^ "Employee ownership program at Grand Rapids tech firm grows". MLive. June 2, 2023. Retrieved March 24, 2025.
- ^ Bruckner, Meredith (July 23, 2021). "Atomic Object wins award for growth, strategic excellence". WDIV Local 4 News. Retrieved March 24, 2025.
- ^ "Atomic Object". Michigan Economic Development Corporation. Retrieved March 24, 2025.
- ^ "Carl Erickson, Past Speaker". Michigan Ross Center for Positive Organizations. Retrieved March 24, 2025.
- ^ Harney, John (June 3, 2011). "Employers' Unwrapped Gift: Time Off". The New York Times. Retrieved March 24, 2025.
- ^ Silverman, Rachel Emma (February 2, 2012). "No More Angling for the Best Seat; More Meetings Are Stand-Up Jobs". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved March 24, 2025.
- ^ Spiegelman, Paul (July 25, 2021). "What About The Dog? Getting Your Team Back To The Office Is Getting Complicated". Forbes. Retrieved July 7, 2025.
External Links
[edit]This page will be placed in the following categories if it is moved to the article namespace.
Categories:
- in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
- reliable
- secondary
- strictly independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.