Integrated Conservation and Development Project

Integrated Conservation and Development Projects^[a] (ICDPs) are biodiversity conservation projects with rural development components. It is an approach that aspires to combine social development with conservation.^[1] These projects aim to attend to biodiversity conservation objectives through the use of socio-economic investment tools. The World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) first introduced ICDPs in the mid-1980s; they wanted to address some of the problems associated with the "fines and fences" (non-participatory) approach to conservation.^[2]

History

The Wildlands & Human Needs Program was initiated in 1985 by WWF, and incorporated 19 ICDPs in 12 countries in Africa and South America. They wanted to improve the quality of life of rural people through projects that integrated the management of natural resources with economic development. Today, there are around 300 ICDPs.^[1]

Characteristics

ICDPs are typically linked to a protected area, such as a national park.^[1] They typically receive funding from external sources and are initiated and managed by conservation organizations and development agencies.

Although biodiversity conservation is the primary goal, ICDPs also aim to:

Address the social and economic requirements of communities who might threaten biodiversity
Improve the relationships between state-managed protected areas and local communities
Benefit indigenous populations through creation of jobs – particularly in agriculture – and revenue from tourism^[3]

ICDPs operate on the following assumptions:^[1]

Diversified local livelihood options will reduce human pressures on biodiversity, leading to improved conservation.
Local people and their way of life comprise the most important threat to the biodiversity of the area in question.
ICDPs offer sustainable alternatives to traditional approaches to protected area management.

Criticism

Conservation organizations have faced criticism over their relationship with the communities in which ICDPs operate; in particular, they have been criticized for designing projects with little to no input from local communities. They have also been reported to refuse bearing or supporting legal battles over land because they find it to be "too political".^[1] However, WWF claims that their ICDPs are implemented in collaboration with local organizations and in consideration of social and economic factors within communities.^[4]

ICDPs have been accused of negatively impacting local communities. For example, it can be difficult for them to market what is grown as part of agroforestry and organic gardening projects.^[5] Additionally, minority ethnic groups and women are rarely accounted for in the redistribution of costs and benefits. Such groups may face barriers to participation due to traditional social hierarchies, leading to less prospects for equal opportunities and collective action.^[1]

ICDPs have been criticized for their focus on alleviating the impact of local communities on protected areas, causing them to overlook external factors like growing market demand for forest and wildlife products, demographic pressures, and vested interests like illegal logging, mineral extraction and ranching.^[1] In addition, ICDPs that are funded internationally may not be financially or economically sustainable once their external funding has been exhausted.^{[example needed]}

Notable ICDPs

Annapurna Conservation Area Project, Nepal
Bwindi Impenetrable Forest, Uganda
Lake Mburo National Park, Uganda
Amboró National Park, Bolivia
Yancheng Coastal Wetlands, China
Crater Mountain Wildlife Management Area, Papua New Guinea
Mount Elgon, Uganda
Ngorongoro Conservation Area, Tanzania
Kilim Ijum, Cameroon
Ostional Wildlife Refuge, Costa Rica
Projects funded by the UK Department for International Development (DFID)

Notes

^
Other names:
- People-centered conservation and development
- Eco-development
- Grassroots conservation
- Community-based natural resource management
- Community wildlife management

References

^ ^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g Hughes, Ross; Flintan, Fiona (2001). Integrating Conservation and Development Experience: A Review and Bibliography of the ICDP Literature (PDF). Chelmsford: Simmons Printers. ISBN 1-899825-77-0. Retrieved January 5, 2024.
^ Ndiaye, Abdoulaye (2001). "A Practitioner's View of Conservation and Development in Africa: Integrated Management and the Djoudj National Park in Senegal". Africa Today. 48 (1): 101–109. doi:10.1353/at.2001.0017. ISSN 1527-1978.
^ "Sharing the best in global development research for policy and practice". Eldis. 2016-07-07. Retrieved 2024-01-02.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
^ "WWF welcomes new national park in Madagascar". wwf.panda.org. Retrieved 2024-01-05.
^ Marcus and Kull. "Setting the Stage: The Politics of Madagascar's Environmental Efforts". African Studies Quarterly. Archived from the original on 21 October 2012. Retrieved 15 November 2013.

v t e Conservation of species
Index of conservation articles
Conservation biology	Biodiversity Captive breeding Compassionate conservation Conservation behavior Conservation-dependent species Conservation genetics Conservation-induced extinction Conservation status Endemism Ex-situ conservation Extinction threshold In-situ conservation Latent extinction risk Marine conservation Mutualisms and conservation Nature conservation Nuisance wildlife Pest Vermin Conservation biology of parasites Species translocation Conservation welfare Threatened species Vulnerability and susceptibility
Approaches	Conservation agriculture Conservation development Conservation finance Conservation grazing Conservation management system Conservation movement Conservation photography Conservation psychology Conspicuous conservation Community-based conservation Ecoregion conservation status Environmental protection Evidence-based conservation Flagship species Forest management Forest protection Tropical rainforest conservation Integrated Conservation and Development Project Other effective area-based conservation measures Riparian buffer Roadless area conservation Roadside conservation Site-based conservation Wetland conservation
Protected areas	Conservation designation Conservation district Conservation easement Conservation reserve Gap analysis Habitat conservation High conservation value area Landscape-scale conservation Marine protected area Marxan Open space reserve Wildlife corridor 30 by 30 target
Key issues	Conservation refugee Fortress conservation Habitat fragmentation Human–wildlife conflict
Restoration	Assisted natural regeneration Ecosystem restoration Island restoration Reforestation afforestation Rewilding marine Species reintroduction
By taxon	Arthropod Bird Hawaiian honeycreeper Raptor Golden eagle Fungi Land mammal American bison Arabian oryx Bear Polar bear Cheetah Elephant Indian elephant Slow loris Tiger Bengal Tiger Wolf Marine Dolphin Gray nurse shark Manatee Painted turtle Salmon Sea otter Plant Seed bank Cryopreservation
By country	Angola Australia Belize Brazil Canada Central African Republic Costa Rica Hong Kong Iceland India Indonesia Ireland Italy Malaysia Mauritius Namibia New Zealand Pakistan Papua New Guinea South Sudan Sweden Uganda United Kingdom Scotland United States forests
Related	Conservation officer De-extinction Planetary boundaries IUCN Red List NatureServe conservation status Special Area of Conservation Soil conservation
List of conservation issues List of organisations List of people Category