From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
In number theory , specifically the study of modular forms , a Maass–Shimura operator is an operator which maps modular forms to almost holomorphic modular forms .
The Maass–Shimura operator on (almost holomorphic) modular forms of weight
k
{\displaystyle k}
is defined by
δ
k
f
(
z
)
:=
1
2
π
i
(
k
2
i
y
+
∂
∂
z
)
f
(
z
)
{\displaystyle \delta _{k}f(z):={\frac {1}{2\pi i}}\left({\frac {k}{2iy}}+{\frac {\partial }{\partial z}}\right)f(z)}
where
y
{\displaystyle y}
is the imaginary part of
z
{\displaystyle z}
.
One may similarly define Maass–Shimura operators of higher orders, where
δ
k
(
n
)
:=
δ
k
+
2
n
−
2
δ
k
+
2
n
−
4
⋯
δ
k
+
2
δ
k
=
1
(
2
π
i
)
n
(
k
+
2
n
−
2
2
i
y
+
∂
∂
z
)
(
k
+
2
n
−
4
2
i
y
+
∂
∂
z
)
⋯
(
k
+
2
2
i
y
+
∂
∂
z
)
(
k
2
i
y
+
∂
∂
z
)
,
{\displaystyle \delta _{k}^{(n)}:=\delta _{k+2n-2}\delta _{k+2n-4}\cdots \delta _{k+2}\delta _{k}={\frac {1}{(2\pi i)^{n}}}\left({\frac {k+2n-2}{2iy}}+{\frac {\partial }{\partial z}}\right)\left({\frac {k+2n-4}{2iy}}+{\frac {\partial }{\partial z}}\right)\cdots \left({\frac {k+2}{2iy}}+{\frac {\partial }{\partial z}}\right)\left({\frac {k}{2iy}}+{\frac {\partial }{\partial z}}\right),}
and
δ
k
(
0
)
{\displaystyle \delta _{k}^{(0)}}
is taken to be identity.
Maass–Shimura operators raise the weight of a function's modularity by 2. If
f
{\displaystyle f}
is modular of weight
k
{\displaystyle k}
with respect to a congruence subgroup
Γ
⊆
S
L
2
(
Z
)
{\displaystyle \varGamma \subseteq \mathrm {SL} _{2}(\mathbb {Z} )}
, then
δ
k
f
{\displaystyle \delta _{k}f}
is modular with weight
k
+
2
{\displaystyle k+2}
:[ 1]
(
δ
k
f
)
(
γ
z
)
=
(
δ
k
f
(
z
)
)
(
c
z
+
d
)
k
+
2
for any
γ
=
(
a
b
c
d
)
∈
Γ
.
{\displaystyle (\delta _{k}f)(\gamma z)=(\delta _{k}f(z))(cz+d)^{k+2}\quad {\text{for any }}\gamma ={\begin{pmatrix}a&b\\c&d\end{pmatrix}}\in \varGamma .}
However,
δ
k
f
{\displaystyle \delta _{k}f}
is not a modular form due to the introduction of a non-holomorphic part.
Maass–Shimura operators follow a product rule: for almost holomorphic modular forms
f
{\displaystyle f}
and
g
{\displaystyle g}
with respective weights
k
{\displaystyle k}
and
ℓ
{\displaystyle \ell }
(from which it is seen that
f
g
{\displaystyle fg}
is modular with weight
k
+
ℓ
{\displaystyle k+\ell }
), one has
δ
k
+
ℓ
(
f
g
)
=
(
δ
k
f
)
g
+
f
(
δ
ℓ
g
)
.
{\displaystyle \delta _{k+\ell }(fg)=(\delta _{k}f)g+f(\delta _{\ell }g).}
Using induction , it is seen that the iterated Maass–Shimura operator satisfies the following identity:
δ
k
(
n
)
=
∑
r
=
0
n
(
−
1
)
n
−
r
(
n
r
)
(
k
+
r
)
n
−
r
(
4
π
y
)
n
−
r
1
(
2
π
i
)
r
∂
r
∂
z
r
{\displaystyle \delta _{k}^{(n)}=\sum _{r=0}^{n}(-1)^{n-r}{\binom {n}{r}}{\frac {(k+r)_{n-r}}{(4\pi y)^{n-r}}}{\frac {1}{(2\pi i)^{r}}}{\frac {\partial ^{r}}{\partial z^{r}}}}
where
(
a
)
m
=
Γ
(
a
+
m
)
/
Γ
(
a
)
{\displaystyle (a)_{m}=\Gamma (a+m)/\Gamma (a)}
is a Pochhammer symbol .[ 2]
Lanphier showed a relation between the Maass–Shimura and Rankin–Cohen bracket operators:[ 3]
(
δ
k
(
n
)
f
(
z
)
)
g
(
z
)
=
∑
j
=
0
n
(
−
1
)
j
(
n
j
)
(
k
+
n
−
1
n
−
j
)
(
k
+
ℓ
+
2
j
−
2
j
)
(
k
+
ℓ
+
n
+
j
−
1
n
−
j
)
δ
k
+
ℓ
+
2
j
(
n
−
j
)
(
[
f
,
g
]
j
(
z
)
)
{\displaystyle (\delta _{k}^{(n)}f(z))g(z)=\sum _{j=0}^{n}{\frac {(-1)^{j}{\binom {n}{j}}{\binom {k+n-1}{n-j}}}{{\binom {k+\ell +2j-2}{j}}{\binom {k+\ell +n+j-1}{n-j}}}}\delta _{k+\ell +2j}^{(n-j)}([f,g]_{j}(z))}
where
f
{\displaystyle f}
is a modular form of weight
k
{\displaystyle k}
and
g
{\displaystyle g}
is a modular form of weight
ℓ
{\displaystyle \ell }
.