Talk:Greater and Lesser Tunbs

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Greater and Lesser Tunbs article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 12 months

Iran

	Iran portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iran, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles related to Iran on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project where you can contribute to the discussions and help with our open tasks.IranWikipedia:WikiProject IranTemplate:WikiProject IranIran
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Islands

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of islands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslandsWikipedia:WikiProject IslandsTemplate:WikiProject IslandsIslands

Arabic name of the islands

Some editors want to include the Arabic name of these islands in the lead and the infobox. Arabic is not an official language in Iran, thus I removed it, I would appreciate the insight of other editors about this. thanks.---Wikaviani ^{(talk) (contribs)} 10:14, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn't matter, if there is any "Disputed" land or sea, all terms of both sides are kept… UAE KING (talk) 16:46, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tone of dispute section

The dispute section is unduly long, gives undue and selective context, and appears written as an essay defending Iranian claims and underplaying or refuting UAE claims.

I have zero subject matter expertise (came to this page after reading a joint statement by the Canadian and UAE govenrments that mentioned the islands because I had never heard of them) and thus I cannot clean up the article because I cannot distinguish the misleading from the unimportant from the essential. Nevertheless it is incredibly obvious that the tone is neither neutral, nor encyclopedic. In particular, nonstandard phrasing, selective framing, and non-encyclopedic language (especially superlatives and value judgements) are ubiquitous. ~2025-31194-12 (talk) 12:21, 22 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]