Talk:Lagrange reversion theorem
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Lagrange reversion theorem. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040920011235/http://www.quantlet.com/mdstat/scripts/xfg/html/xfghtmlnode8.html to http://www.quantlet.com/mdstat/scripts/xfg/html/xfghtmlnode8.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:20, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
Relation to Lagrange inversion theorem
[edit]Reading the linked source "A Course in Modern Analysis" (the fourth edition is similar enough to the third edition, whose text can be found on Wikisource, I get the sense that the Lagrange reversion theorem is intimately connected to the Lagrange inversion theorem, i.e. the theorem of Bürmann, as described on Wikipedia, although that connection is currently ambiguous / not understandable from reading the corresponding Wikipedia articles. Does anybody know more about this?
(One user on MathOverflow recommends 'Richard Stanley's book "Enumerative Combinatorics" (vol 2, Ch 5, Thm 5.4.2)'). TucanHolmes (talk) 12:01, 12 August 2025 (UTC)