Talk:Legality of cryptocurrency by country or territory
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Legality of cryptocurrency by country or territory article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 3 months ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | WARNING: ACTIVE COMMUNITY SANCTIONS The article Legality of cryptocurrency by country or territory, along with other pages relating to blockchain and cryptocurrencies, is designated by the community as a contentious topic. The current restrictions are:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be sanctioned.
|
Semi-protected edit request on 19 December 2024
[edit]![]() | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Add El Salvador to alphabetical index. 207.96.32.81 (talk) 16:00, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
British Gibraltar in Center Europe
[edit]How can british Gibraltar be in Center Europe, when Spain is in Southern Europe, and France in Western Europe? How can Spain be in Southern Europe being at the west of France when France is in Western Europe?
First a source may be given for any such used geographical classification. Later, common sense should apply... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.120.88.229 (talk • contribs)
Binary legality?
[edit]I am not to understand this will to classify Bitcoin either as legal or banned. Is such classification based on any source?
Does it help to understand applicable (and changing) regulation? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.120.88.229 (talk • contribs)
"legal status of cryptocurrencies" (sic) ?
[edit]It is written: "The legal status of cryptocurrencies". Legal status is defined as "Legal status describes the legal rights, duties and obligations of a person or entity".
Are cryptocurrencies a kind of person?
Shouldn't it be: The law applicable to cryptocurrencies varies substantially from one jurisdiction to another, and is still undefined or changing in many of them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.120.88.229 (talk • contribs)
- Yes, the definition at legal status is probably too narrow, but in colloquial use the term makes sense. It's not limited to applicable law but whether the law allows its ownership and use.Also please sign your comments. I'll do it for you this time but it's expected of all editors. You can do it with four tildes ~~~~ Oblivy (talk) 12:12, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
Bitcoin as legal tender in El Salvador no more correct
[edit]El Salvador does not accept Bitcoin anymore as legal tender Source: https://www.bbc.com/mundo/articles/c4gpv776zd0o 186.72.109.218 (talk) 14:58, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
The map should be updated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.72.109.218 (talk) 14:58, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
- C-Class Economics articles
- Mid-importance Economics articles
- WikiProject Economics articles
- C-Class WikiProject Cryptocurrency articles
- Mid-importance WikiProject Cryptocurrency articles
- WikiProject Cryptocurrency articles
- C-Class Finance & Investment articles
- Mid-importance Finance & Investment articles
- WikiProject Finance & Investment articles
- C-Class Internet articles
- Mid-importance Internet articles
- WikiProject Internet articles
- C-Class law articles
- Low-importance law articles
- WikiProject Law articles
- List-Class List articles
- Mid-importance List articles
- WikiProject Lists articles
- List-Class country articles
- WikiProject Countries articles
- Wikipedia articles under general sanctions