Jump to content

Talk:Model of hierarchical complexity

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Unpublished manuscripts

[edit]

Unpublished manuscripts cannot be used as references, and have been removed. DGG (talk) 06:41, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Please follow the full formal procedures as specified in WP:Copyright. It is not enough to give us permission to publish the material. It must specifically be released under the GFDL license. Be sure you have the publishers permission to do this, and certify it to the Foundation as specified win WP:Copyright. Be aware that this gives permission to all parties to reproduces and modify the material in any manner and for any purpose, even for commercial use, as long as the source is given. Relatively few publishers are willing to offer such releases.

I need help with this. I am the owner of the website Dareassociation.org. I give permission to use material from the scoring manual. What else do I have to do. How do I get it relased un the GFDL license? I read over it and it does not give a set of actions nor forms. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.96.160.201 (talkcontribs) 19:48, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You do it as described in WP:Donating copyrighted material:

  1. for a website: the best way is to place a copy of the GFDL license on the bottom of the page involved--if you have personally created the material in it and own the copyright. But I do not see any such website cited. If the web site contains material published elsewhere, you must own the copyright of the material, not merely have permission to use it for the web site.
  2. for a scoring manual (I suppose you mean the table for the stages), if it has been published elsewhere, you need to either own the copyright, or the publisher must license it under GFDL or public domain, see below.
  3. If you own the copyright, you place on this talk page a statement that you own the copyright and are donating it under GFDL, and you send an email from your official verifiable address to the Wikimedia Communications committee at the e-mail address "permissions-en AT wikimedia DOT org"saying so. They will then request confirmation.

If the publisher owns the copyright, and has given permission to you to make use of it for your own use only, or even for republication, you may not use it on wikipedia, because anything on wikipedia must be licensed to the entire world under GFDL for reuse and republication for any purpose whatsoever including commercial use. . The publisher can grant a license for this--they almost never do . If they do, you will have to prove it. Their permission must specifically acknowledge that they release it under GFDL or an equivalent CC-attribution license. It is not enough that they give permission to use it in wikipedia, because of the reuse permitted for our material. DGG (talk) 15:31, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is not done promptly and documented, the article will be listed for deletion. Permission for WP to publish it is not enough
Further, there is the material reproduced from "Introduction to the Model of Hierarchical Complexity” by M. L. Commons, in the Behavioral Development Bulletin, 13, 1-6 (http://www.behavioral-development-bulletin.com/). Copyright 2007 Martha Pelaez. Reproduced with permission of the publisher." The same thing applies. DGG (talk) 04:31, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

I removed the "Copyright permissions" notice from the article because, as noted above, all text in Wikipedia is released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Biogeographist (talk) 04:30, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Self-contextualizing the MHC

[edit]

Is the Model of Hierarchical Complexity, by its own definitions, a metasystem or a paradigm? It would be a potentially useful example to add to one of the higher levels that have none listed at present. As I see it, either: Model of Hierarchical Complexity = metasystem (level 12) -> mathematical psychology = paradigm (level 13) -> psychology = field (level 14), or: Model of Hierarchical Complexity = paradigm (level 13) -> mathematical psychology = field (level 14). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.221.121.179 (talk) 05:50, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Vegaswikian (talk) 19:37, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]



Model of Hierarchical ComplexityModel of hierarchical complexity

Per WP:MOSCAPS ("Wikipedia avoids unnecessary capitalization") and WP:TITLE, this is a generic, common term, not a propriety or commercial term, so the article title should be downcased. In addition, WP:MOSCAPS says that a compound item should not be upper-cased just because it is abbreviated with caps. Lowercase will match the formatting of related article titles. Tony (talk) 04:45, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Deleted Section from Article (2016 April 18)

[edit]

The following section, titled: "Michael Common's Model of Hierarchical Complexity Patent" was deleted.

I could see no good reason why these patents were in the article. If there is a good reason please feel free to return. 213.215.180.10 (talk) 14:09, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Miscellany and extensions

[edit]

M. Commons actually almost built A Model for Heterarchical Complexity (not only of Hierarchical Complexity); it almost counts levels up to Inter-Paradigm and Inter-Disciplinary and more than that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Buguldey (talkcontribs) 04:38, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Removed writing task and unpublished reference

[edit]

I removed the "writing" task from Model of hierarchical complexity § List of examples because the only research cited is from an unpublished manuscript from 1985 that I could not find online either in Google or in other databases such as WorldCat. Please feel free to add the "writing" task to the list of examples again as long as a verifiable source is provided (preferably published in a scholarly journal with reputable peer review). The removed reference was: Commons, M.L., & De Vos, I.B. (1985). How researchers help writers. Unpublished manuscript available from Commons@tiac.net. Biogeographist (talk) 15:20, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mathematical_psychology

Wiki Education assignment: Adult Development Fall 2023

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 11 September 2023 and 11 December 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Tsuki2023 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Tsuki2023 (talk) 21:35, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]