Jump to content

Talk:NetDynamics Application Server

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Netscape AS Or NetDynamics AS?

[edit]

The article says that the iPlanet Appserver was based on both the NetDynamics and Netscape app servers. The Netscape Application Server article says it was purely Netscape AS. Anyone have a cite for which is actually the case?--NapoliRoma (talk) 22:58, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

requested edit

[edit]

hired by on of the founders of NetDynamics to write this page independently to add information and make it more robust. I am not a professional Wikipedia editor, or connected to any firm or organization, but just a graduate student writing three pages related to them.

Adding on behalf of User:Bendiwan in an attempt to help them understand how this is supposed to work. Basically they wish to entirely rewrite the article. I know this is a little off from the usual process but here are their proposed changes. Overall it does seem like an improvement from what we've got now, but it would be best if someone with no COI reviewed it to be sure it's propoerly sourced and not overly promotional in tone. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:34, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well, they've gone ahead and just done it again, so I'm turning off my part of this request. Edits need reviewing by an uninvolved editor though. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:39, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


User:Bendiwan I have submitted one edit request that was declined. I did some changes per the feedback received and am now waiting for over a month for feedback on my second edit request. Would really love if someone could take a look at it when they have the time, and let me know how I can get the edit approved. thank you.

Edit Request

[edit]

Bendiwan (talk) 02:41, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Bendiwan:, I've taken a brief look at this, and this article sounds highly promotional about the company. I gather from the text of the proposed content that this company is no longer in existence, but this definitely reads as though it's looking back through rose-tinted glasses. As such, I don't think the tone of the content here is suitable for an encyclopedia article, but that can be fixed. We must write about subjects from a neutral point of view. There are also large sections of this text which appear to be unsourced, though to be fair I have no way of verifying the offline sources you've included in the references list so I might have overlooked bits.
Large rewrites like this are generally harder to review than smaller changes and unfortunately I don't have the time to properly review this just now, so I'll leave the edit request open in case someone else gets to this before I manage to get back to it. stwalkerster (talk) 23:14, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Closed as  Not done, per Stwalkerster. Proposer has submitted a second edit request. JBchrch talk 07:58, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Request

[edit]


Bendiwan (talk)

  • @Bendiwan: This is the oldest request in the backlog at the moment. If you are still around and interested in this content being incorporated, reply here and I can see about looking at it in more detail. Right off the bat, it'd be helpful if you could edit it for Manual of Style concerns (especially references, which follow punctuation, and should ideally avoid bare links and instead use the respective templates). WhinyTheYounger (WtY)(talk, contribs) 01:48, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • It has been a month, and the requester has not responded to this ping so I am going to close this request as stale. Bendiwan may open a new request below if they return. Z1720 (talk) 18:30, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]