Jump to content

Talk:Year 2000 problem

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Opposing view - "fix on failure"

[edit]

"The contrary view asserts that there were no, or very few, critical problems to begin with. This view also asserts that there would have been only a few minor mistakes and that a "fix on failure" approach would have been the most efficient and cost-effective way to solve these problems as they occurred."

No source or evidence is provided to support this assertion. It is highly controversial. "Fix on failure" would have been disastrous. It would have been ludicrously impractical for large corporations to fix all their business critical applications if they were failing simultaneously. Perhaps even worse, amidst the chaos it would have been impossible to detect serious Y2K errors in systems that were still running. Freddie Threepwood (talk) 10:32, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Come to think of it, fixing a problem with 2 bytes variable (0..65536) vs 4 bytes (0..4294967296) variable vs "byte" variable (0..255) vs "integer" (-32768..32767) with a little bugfix can be done so easily it can be done in a sneaky manner. 81.89.66.133 (talk) 15:05, 9 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Preventive work

[edit]

This article doesn't really tell us how much the attempts to prevent problems took place3 and its effectiveness or uselessness. 136.36.176.51 (talk) 16:40, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

>This article doesn't really tell us how much the attempts to prevent problems took place3 and its effectiveness or uselessness.
Every time you praise some company for implementing some measures in some place, you'll be greeted with "wp:IRS?"-like question 81.89.66.133 (talk) 15:00, 9 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]