Template talk:Infobox constitution

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Infoboxes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Infoboxes on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InfoboxesWikipedia:WikiProject InfoboxesTemplate:WikiProject InfoboxesInfoboxes

Politics

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics

Law

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw

Category:Pages using duplicate arguments in template calls

The last two edits by User:Bluealbion have added this template to Category:Pages using duplicate arguments in template calls which clearly means the edits were malformed. You can usually see these errors if you use "show preview" before saving. Something you should always do when making edits to templates like this one. Please discuss here before make more edits. Thank you! Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 17:18, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I think there is one such problem: orig_lang_code is called twice. I’m not confident enough to edit the template though. Keriluamox (talk) 08:18, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposal, new parameter

Not sure if this is the appropriate place for this, but I've noticed the template lacks a parameter for "Superseded by", which would be useful to link the Constitution that has replaced the subject one, which is the case for many countries that have had many constitutions. Thus, I'd like to propose adding this parameter. Torimem (talk) 20:35, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I had exactly the same idea. Thankfully, adding a parameter based on an existing one turns out to be pretty easy, so I simply went ahead and did it. I tested it out on the infobox in Weimar Constitution and it works fine. Peter G Werner (talk) 23:54, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. I had even forgotten that I had posted this here. I'll add it to Brazil's constitutions, which is what I had in mind back then. Torimem (talk) 00:36, 2 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]