Template talk:Sort

See also: Help talk:Sorting.

Template:Sort is permanently protected from editing as it is a heavily used or highly visible template. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by consensus, editors may use {{edit template-protected}} to notify an administrator or template editor to make the requested edit. Usually, any contributor may edit the template's documentation to add usage notes or categories.

Any contributor may edit the template's sandbox. Functionality of the template can be checked using test cases.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Sort template.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1, 2: 6 months

To help centralize discussions and keep related topics together, the talk pages of several other templates redirect here.

Template-protected edit request on 12 November 2025

This edit request to Template:Sortname has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Please add an option to display names in an East Asian order ("last name" "first name"). KKhuc92 (talk) 06:49, 12 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wouldn't entering such a name in the desired order get that result? -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 09:16, 12 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:31, 12 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Adding substitution support

Moved from Template talk:Percentage

–

I'm trying to add substitution support for this, which would help with e.g. {{AfC accept/B percentage}} (used in the {{AfC accept}} talk page message). However, doing so in the sandbox leads to results like {{subst:Percentage/sandbox|1|5|2}} = <span data-sort-value="7001200000000000000♠" style="display:none"></span>20%. This seems to be offering a more precise value than the displayed one, but the extra code is generally going to be unwanted. Is there a way to resolve this? Sdkb ^talk 20:58, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Sdkb That's probably a question for Module:Sortkey --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 17:12, 13 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]