User talk:204.112.199.164

October 2025

Hello, I'm BrandNewSaint. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to James Cubitt have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. BrandNewSaint (talk) 20:12, 2 October 2025 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop removing or altering references in ways that break or weaken sourcing as you have done on multiple articles by stripping archive links. Your edits have been reverted. Archived URLs are required on Wikipedia to ensure source stability if the live site changes or disappears.

Continuing to remove archived references is disruptive editing and may result in your being blocked from editing. Thank you. Thilio^{R O B O T🤖 talk} 21:24, 2 October 2025 (UTC)

I'm correcting bad links created to my own work and site. Should I just create a htaccess file at my end and redirect such links. The archived web linkes are never the same as the main website. 204.112.199.164 (talk) 23:53, 2 October 2025 (UTC)

I can also remove my site from the web archive. And then it needs to be the original website. 204.112.199.164 (talk) 23:54, 2 October 2025 (UTC)

In many cases, the web archive is listed first, Archiseek.com is a continuously edited and added to resource, the web archive is often linked to a very old version. 204.112.199.164 (talk) 23:58, 2 October 2025 (UTC)

uk.archiseek.com was never intended to be anything but a test site therefore insisting on the archive rather than then main url at archiseek.com is pretty petty. 204.112.199.164 (talk) 00:53, 3 October 2025 (UTC)

So, Wayback Machine has confirmed the deletion of those links you had as archived links. So perhaps the relevant and correct URL that I inserted for the record should be reinstated, as the archived references are now broken as the content no longer exists on WBM.

Or you should remove the reference.

Cheers

Paul Clerkin 204.112.199.164 (talk) 17:35, 18 October 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Paul Clerkin (publisher) (October 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pythoncoder was:

Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include:

• Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch
• Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects
• Essay-like writing
• Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references
• Close paraphrasing
  

Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Paul Clerkin (publisher) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

—pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 18:57, 23 October 2025 (UTC)

Hello, 204.112.199.164! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! —pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 18:57, 23 October 2025 (UTC)

---