User talk:2601:602:8080:3E00:11FA:818B:FDC0:D5B9

September 2024

Hello, I'm FifthFive. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Juno Dawson seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. FifthFive (talk) 20:29, 25 September 2024 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Juno Dawson. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. AntiDionysius (talk) 22:06, 25 September 2024 (UTC)

What specifically was commentary or my own point of view? I would like to address and correct. 2601:602:8080:3E00:11FA:818B:FDC0:D5B9 (talk) 00:07, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

I've reverted your edit again, due to potential violation of the biographies of living persons policy, as well as neutral point of view issues (see above). Saying the statements 'attracted attention' seems a bit far considering the referenced article is the original publisher of them. It also doesn't give a good impression that Attitude removed the story from their site. If you can find a separate source, that would help a lot. And if you have any questions, feel free to ask. FifthFive (talk) 23:16, 25 September 2024 (UTC)

I added several citations to show that the statements attracted attention and controversy. I removed the adjective "homophobic" from describing the statements as this may not be neutral. Then I added that statements were issued after the interview attracted this attention. I did note that the interview was removed from the magazine's website, but they would still remain in their printed copies. I tried to make all the proper citations. Let me know if this isn't to the Wikipedia standard. 2601:602:8080:3E00:11FA:818B:FDC0:D5B9 (talk) 00:06, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

You are welcome to edit anonymously; however, creating an account is free and has several benefits (for example, the ability to create pages, upload media and edit without your IP address being visible to the public).

Create an account

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

• Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, ; a volunteer will visit you here shortly!

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

— Newslinger talk 08:17, 22 May 2025 (UTC)

May 2025

Please stop. If you continue to make unconstructive edits to Wikipedia using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology), as you did at Talk:Juno Dawson, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not post LLM-generated talk page arguments, especially without properly disclosing that your comment is AI-generated.

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template. — Newslinger talk 08:17, 22 May 2025 (UTC)

You have recently made edits related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. This is a standard message to inform you that articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. — Newslinger talk 08:17, 22 May 2025 (UTC)

---