User talk:A455bcd9

Archives

This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be auto-archived by if there are more than 5.

why do you hate turkey so much

I noticed that in greeks population in turkey article history verison you seem to add anti-turkey propaganda in article in introduction section to be more specified Why? wikipedia supposed to be a neutral site 2600:480A:4A51:9300:78FB:203:BAF0:B2C2 (talk) 01:57, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Precious anniversary

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:01, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Anniversary A455bcd9 🎉

Hey @A455bcd9. Your wiki edit anniversary was 1 day ago, marking 17 years of dedicated contributions to English Wikipedia. Your passion for sharing knowledge and your remarkable contributions have not only enriched the project, but also inspired countless others to contribute. Thank you for your amazing contributions. Wishing you many more wonderful years ahead in the Wiki journey. :) -❙❚❚❙❙ GnOeee ❚❙❚❙❙ ✉ 07:13, 2 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

November 2025

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Environmental impact of bitcoin, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. GenoV84 (talk) 16:08, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

lol a455bcd9 (Antoine) (talk) 16:08, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Grow up, lmao 😂😂😂 GenoV84 (talk) 16:12, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A "See also" section is a useful way to organize internal links to related or comparable articles and "build the web". However, the section itself is not required; many high-quality and comprehensive articles do not have one.

The section should be a bulleted list, sorted either logically (for example, by subject matter), chronologically, or alphabetically. Consider using {{Columns-list}} or {{Div col}} if the list is lengthy.

Contents: Links in this section should be relevant and limited to a reasonable number. Whether a link belongs in the "See also" section is ultimately a matter of editorial judgment and common sense. One purpose of "See also" links is to enable readers to explore tangentially related topics; however, articles linked should be related to the topic of the article or be in the same defining category. For example, the article on Jesus might include a link to List of people claimed to be Jesus because it is related to the subject but not otherwise linked in the article. GenoV84 (talk) 16:12, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]