User talk:ACMehta

Welcome!

Hi ACMehta! I noticed your contributions to Commonwealth Bank and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Qwerty123M (talk) 12:54, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello ACMehta, and welcome to Wikipedia! I'm @Gvihar, your guide. Before you begin, please keep these core policies in mind:

Verifiability (WP:V): Always cite reliable, published sources for any facts you add.
Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV): Write in a balanced, unbiased tone—avoid taking sides.
No original research (WP:OR): Only include information that's already been published elsewhere.
Civility (WP:CIVIL): Be respectful and assume good faith when interacting with other editors.

Gvihar 19:10, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Gvihar okaay, I got you. But my edit at Ishwak Singh was valid as I only removed the red-link (non existent link) which was put at Mitti web series. How is it wrong? Can you please explain me. ACMehta (talk) 19:19, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove red links; they help in creating new pages in the future. Gvihar 19:27, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Gvihar okay Gvihar ACMehta (talk) 19:31, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

August 2025

Your recent editing history at Turkish Airlines shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
I’m posting this here as I have also posted it on the other editor’s talk page. Please discuss changes instead of reverting back and forth. Danners430 _{tweaks made} 08:24, 11 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Danners430 Heyy, I didn't revert it again and I wouldn't do that in future also (infact, I knew about it now that my edits were reverted after you mentioned it here) and nor I'm interested in starting an edit war. I'll not edit that pages again. ThankYOU@Danners430 user. ACMehta (talk) 14:44, 11 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It’s all good - I posted the notice here purely in the spirit of fairness, as I placed it on the other party’s talk page too to try and get them to discuss on talk pages. Danners430 _{tweaks made} 15:06, 11 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Danners430 Ohhh..!! ThankYOU anyways Danners430. ACMehta (talk) 15:41, 11 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]