User talk:Archiealibasa

This is Archiealibasa's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Superior Rigging & Erecting Company (October 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KGirlTrucker81 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No proper sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Superior Rigging & Erecting Company and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KGirl ^{(Wanna chat?)} 13:07, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Archiealibasa, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KGirl ^{(Wanna chat?)} 13:07, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. SwisterTwister talk 16:15, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2025

Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow, or move it unilaterally against naming conventions or consensus. This includes making page moves while a discussion remains underway. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:18, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Archiealibasa. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Archiealibasa. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Archiealibasa|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. COOLIDICAE🕶 18:22, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I declare that I do not receive payment or any form of compensation for my edits and entries. Archiealibasa (talk) 18:52, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I can just send the proof to arbcom then. Have a great day and feel free to review WP:PAID! COOLIDICAE🕶 18:54, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Archiealibasa (talk) 18:55, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Praxidicae. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Draft:Gabrielle Juliano-Villani have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Do not remove tags on articles or drafts without adequate explanation. COOLIDICAE🕶 19:49, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or edit comments on Articles for deletion discussions, as you did at Patrick Casale, you may be blocked from editing. COOLIDICAE🕶 21:18, 27 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No I did not remove the notices, what are you talking about?? I edited the content, and I did not touch the notices there. What are you talking about?? Archiealibasa (talk) 21:35, 27 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Why were my edits on that article reverted? Aren't we supposed to improve the contents to make it more encyclopedic, authoritative and objective? Archiealibasa (talk) 21:38, 27 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"It may require cleanup to comply with Wikipedia's content policies, particularly neutral point of view." Archiealibasa (talk) 21:38, 27 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gabrielle Juliano-Villani, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Trauma. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Gabrielle Juliano-Villani

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Gabrielle Juliano-Villani, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. COOLIDICAE🕶 17:54, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Patrick Casale

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Patrick Casale, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. COOLIDICAE🕶 17:55, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Patrick Casale for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Patrick Casale is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patrick Casale until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

COOLIDICAE🕶 18:05, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am rewriting the content for a more objective and encyclopedic approach, and to properly illustrate it's significance as public information. Archiealibasa (talk) 18:08, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Do not move this back to draft space as it's already being discussed for deletion. COOLIDICAE🕶 18:20, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Admin Significa liberdade is awesome and very helpful! Hope some of the others listening here follow her example. (and stop being so self-entitled) Archiealibasa (talk) 18:25, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Gabrielle Juliano-Villani moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Gabrielle Juliano-Villani. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it is promotional and reads like an advertisement and you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 18:08, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, will make improvements to the content for a more objective, informative, and encyclopedic approach to the profile. Archiealibasa (talk) 18:15, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You are awesome, and very helpful. Unlike the other reviewers here who are complete as*es Archiealibasa (talk) 18:23, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No paid editing

I've publicly expressed my concerns about this issue. Now Congress is investigating us. If we don't stop paid editing, we will lose our charitable status. Come back in 17 months. Bearian (talk) 02:08, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Who's talking about paid editing? This is all speculation/suspicion Archiealibasa (talk) 02:27, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]