User talk:CFCF
| |||||
|
"ß-carotin" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]
The redirect ß-carotin has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 9 § ß-carotin until a consensus is reached.
"Hällristning" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]
The redirect Hällristning has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 July 16 § Hällristning until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer1234qwer4 14:44, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
Nomination for discussion of Template:Trolling
[edit]Template:Trolling has been nominated for discussion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. 88.97.192.42 (talk) 20:45, 4 August 2025 (UTC)
"Atlas of Human Cardiac Anatomy" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]
The redirect Atlas of Human Cardiac Anatomy has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 August 24 § Atlas of Human Cardiac Anatomy until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer1234qwer4 05:28, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
Books & Bytes – Issue 70
[edit]Issue 70, July–August 2025
- New collections:
- Times of Malta
- Africa Intelligence
- Intelligence Online
- La Lettre
- Glitz
- Spotlight: Wikimania
(This message was sent to User:CFCF and is being posted here due to a redirect.)
Medical edits
[edit]Hi there,
I’m interested in contributing to the medical pages on Wikipedia. Do you have any recommendations regarding where to start? I’m happy to help wherever there is the most need currently. DataFocused (talk) 02:51, 1 October 2025 (UTC)
- @DataFocused, there are many areas and WP:MED keeps a list of articles of varying quality. I would suggest you consider your area of interest, rather than medicine broadly, or even just something that piques your interest right now, and then seeing whether there is anything Start or C-classed there. I would suggest you read WP:MEDRS and WP:MEDMOS to get an idea of quality of articles. Then I would suggest introducing yourself at WT:MED, where there is a steady stream of discussion on articles needing improvement. CFCF (talk) 03:34, 1 October 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks! I think I’ll start with some Start and C-classed articles. Will also introduce myself at WT:MED DataFocused (talk) 03:46, 1 October 2025 (UTC)
- By the way, the conclusions seem pretty solid, but just a note that the chiropractic page is using a lot of 15-20 year old reviews. May be worth you or another regular medical editor taking a look. DataFocused (talk) 06:31, 1 October 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks! I think I’ll start with some Start and C-classed articles. Will also introduce myself at WT:MED DataFocused (talk) 03:46, 1 October 2025 (UTC)