User talk:CocaPopsRather

Archives

Help with something

The page Nucci is being reverted back. I'm telling that person that rapper is mentioned in the title page but the person isn't listening. 2600:1700:EF20:960:CC1E:846D:153D:5061 (talk) 18:32, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. The title of the article mentions that they are a rapper. Changing one piece of information in the article to singer is not enough. You must request a page move and edit everything in the article stating he is a rapper, to singer. (If its true).

But you only changed one sentence to singer while all other information in the article stated rapper. CocaPopsRather 18:45, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@CocaPopsRather Hi, I would like to ask you if you know someone who reviews my article because it is starting to take a long time and no one has tried to review it even though it is a small article. Thank you. Kozioğlu (talk) 16:39, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, @[[User:Kozioğlu|Kozioğlu] I may not be the right person to ask about this as I have no experience in publishing. But I believe you need to request someone to review it? Not sure, hope this helps CocaPopsRather 17:06, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of tea for you!

thank you for your contributions!! :D xRozuRozu (t • c) 06:21, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! CocaPopsRather 06:25, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback granted

Hi CocaPopsRather. After reviewing your request, I have enabled rollback on your account. Please keep the following things in mind while using rollback:

Being granted rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle or Ultraviolet. It just adds a [rollback] button next to a page's latest live revision. It does not grant you any additional "status" on Wikipedia, nor does it change how Wikipedia policies apply to you.
Rollback should be used to revert clear and unambiguous cases of vandalism only. Never use rollback to revert good faith edits. For more information about when rollback is appropriate, see Wikipedia:Rollback § When to use rollback.
Rollback should never be used to edit war, and it should never be used in a content-related dispute to restore the page to your preferred revision. If rollback is abused or used for this purpose or any other inappropriate purpose, the permission will be revoked.
Use common sense. If you're not sure about something, ask!

I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, and feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate use of rollback. If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin) and Wikipedia:Rollback. Good luck and thanks! * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 21:34, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for taking time out of your day and reviewing my request; and I have read and agree to all the above CocaPopsRather 14:39, 24 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary account IP viewer granted

Hello, CocaPopsRather. Per your request, your account has been granted temporary-account-viewer rights. You are now able to reveal the IP addresses of individuals using temporary accounts that are not visible to the general public. This is very sensitive information that is only to be used to aid in anti-abuse workflows. Please take a moment to review Wikipedia:Temporary account IP viewer for more information on this user right. It is important to remember:

You must not share IP address data with someone who does not have the same access permissions unless disclosure is permissible as per guidelines listed at Foundation:Policy:Wikimedia Access to Temporary Account IP Addresses Policy.
Access must not be used for political control, to apply pressure on editors, or as a threat against another editor in a content dispute. There must be a valid reason to investigate a temporary user. Note that using multiple temporary accounts is not forbidden, so long as they are not used in violation of policies (for example, block or ban evasion).

It is also important to note that the following actions are logged for others to see:

When a user accepts the preference that enables or disables IP reveal for their account.
Revealing an IP address of a temporary account.
Listing the temporary accounts that are associated with one or more IP addresses (using the CIDR notation format).

Remember, even if a user is violating policy, avoid revealing personal information if possible. Use temporary account usernames rather than disclosing IP addresses directly, or give information such as same network/not same network or similar. If you do not want the user right anymore then please ask me or another administrator and it will be removed for you. You may also voluntarily give up access at any time by visiting Special:Preferences. Happy editing! Sohom (talk) 14:57, 24 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for reviewing and accepting my request, I will follow all guidelines and policies. Thanks CocaPopsRather 14:58, 24 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Signature contrast

Hello, I'm Femke. I wanted to let you know that your signature does not meet the requirements for signature appearances. Your signature may have too little contrast. You can use a tool to check the contrast to determine if your signature meets the minimum contrast ratio of 4.5. If you have any questions, feel free to reply or ask for help at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 15:44, 24 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hopefully this works. CocaPopsRather 15:55, 24 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Much better, thanks! —Femke 🐦 (talk) 16:24, 24 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It’s a place

But it’s a place it doesn’t need citations Blobian75 (talk) 22:31, 26 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Even though it’s a place per WP:V and WP:BURDEN the claim needed citations. Thank you CocaPopsRather 22:37, 26 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ah alright i’ll put citations on stuff Blobian75 (talk) 22:48, 26 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for contributing! I hope you decide to stay! CocaPopsRather 22:54, 26 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]