User talk:Dwarfroe

Talk page archives
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025

Nomination of Scrapyard (mixtape) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Scrapyard (mixtape), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scrapyard (mixtape) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File talk:Luigi Mangione sig.svg

Please comment on the evidence that I have described at File talk:Luigi Mangione sig.svg indicating that this signature file is a hoax. Cullen328 (talk) 08:15, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Babe Ruth Signature

Hey, thanks for adding signatures to athletes, but for some reason the Babe Ruth one came out a little weird visually when you look at his page compared to all the other ones you’ve done. GOAT Bones231012 (talk) 19:28, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@GOAT Bones231012: I don't see a difference. Could you elaborate? - dwarfroe (talk / contr) 19:34, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe it looks different visually for me because I am on my mobile? But I don’t know it’s like the formatting of it is off to the left. All the other ones you added like Mike Tyson and Floyd Mayweather are perfectly fine. GOAT Bones231012 (talk) 19:49, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@GOAT Bones231012: I see it now. This seems to be a problem with the infobox used. I've asked a question on Template talk:Infobox baseball biography to try to solve it. Thank you for letting me know. - dwarfroe (talk / contr) 20:03, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of EDP445 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article EDP445 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EDP445 (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

PARAKANYAA (talk) 00:15, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

As an experienced editor, you should know that court documents cannot be used as sources for BLP content, per WP:BLPPRIMARY. FactOrOpinion (talk) 11:39, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Draft moved: PopularMMOs

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:PopularMMOs. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Bobby Cohn 🍁 (talk) 14:02, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: PopularMMOs (July 11)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Zxcvbnm was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Sources are largely unreliable, or, failing that, trivial.

ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 08:21, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Mala Wharf

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Mala Wharf you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Rollinginhisgrave -- Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 13:05, 12 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]