User talk:EntropyReducingGuy
Welcome!
[edit]{{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking 
or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages.|
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines
|
The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous
|
Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 22:27, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
Your thread has been archived
[edit]
|
Hello EntropyReducingGuy! The thread you created at the Teahouse, You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please .
See also the help page about the archival process.
The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing |
Your thread has been archived
[edit]|
|
Hello EntropyReducingGuy! The thread you created at the Teahouse, You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please .
See also the help page about the archival process.
The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing |
Disambiguation link notification for March 5
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Noam Shazeer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page N12. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
Your source was too ambiguous for yael
[edit]I'm not saying your lying but we have strict rules on wp:blp. it didnt mention her any where and seemed like the homepage. could you fix the source or use another, or show me where you saw it? then we can unvert JamesEMonroe (talk) 13:37, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
- specifically saying that she is gay JamesEMonroe (talk) 13:37, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
- Hi @JamesEMonroe,
- The source that I brought is not ambiguous and not a homepage. It is rather an episode from a podcast about LGBTQ issues broadcasted and streamed by the Israeli Public Broadcasting Corporation. At the end of this episode there is a short interview with Yael Eisenberg about her (then) new poetry book. In this interview the interviewer describes her as an LGBT artist (around minute 48:37). Of course this is all in Hebrew, which I assume you don't speak, but maybe you can find an Hebrew speaking person whom you trust to verify this. I suppose I should have put the time stamp in the reference to make it clear.
- Also there is this article from Haaretz in Hebrew. Unfortunately it is behind a paywall. But even in the available secondary title you can see the sentence
- מגלה איך מתנהלים עם בת זוג שהיא גם מוזיקאית — ועם מבטים הומופוביים ברחוב
- which means that "she discovers how to deal with a girlfriend/partner who is also a musician, and with homophobic stares in the street".
- So can you unvert it, or can I? EntropyReducingGuy(We can talk, but I reply with intended delay)💧♾️➡❄️📚 10:05, 12 May 2025 (UTC)
- Hi @JamesEMonroe
- Since there was no response from you for a long time, I'll take your silence as agreement and unvert.
- 10x EntropyReducingGuy(We can talk, but I reply with intended delay)💧♾️➡❄️📚 17:24, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- oh sorry, I thought I saw you already unverted, so I didnt reply. My bad. but yes I trust your judgement JamesEMonroe (talk) 22:27, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- yes you can unvert it JamesEMonroe (talk) 22:29, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- 10x EntropyReducingGuy(We can talk, but I reply with intended delay)💧♾️➡❄️📚 15:28, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
- yes you can unvert it JamesEMonroe (talk) 22:29, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- oh sorry, I thought I saw you already unverted, so I didnt reply. My bad. but yes I trust your judgement JamesEMonroe (talk) 22:27, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
I've just started it! (I saw you are interested in the subject, well... any help in developing the article would be greatly appreciated!) Thank you. Nextada (talk) 11:36, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Hi @Nextada
- To be honest, I’m not sure what more to add at this stage. I’m confident that as we move closer to the singularity and AI eventually exceeds human capabilities in every area, this topic will become increasingly important. While we’re not quite there yet, this article will serve as a stub. I’ll keep you posted with any relevant sources that I may find. EntropyReducingGuy(We can talk, but I reply with intended delay)💧♾️➡❄️📚 13:35, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Introduction to contentious topics
[edit]
You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Additionally, you must be logged in, have 500 edits, and have an account age of 30 days, and you are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any page within this topic.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.
Rainsage (talk) 19:16, 18 August 2025 (UTC)
- 10x EntropyReducingGuy(I talk, but can reply slowly)💧♾️➡❄️📚 18:01, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
Categories
[edit]
Please do not put articles into categories without references that support this categorizatio as you ttit in Saharon Shelah and some other pages. --Altenmann >talk 10:33, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
- I relied on the category page in the Hebrew Wikipedia, which I’ve now linked to the category in the English Wikipedia. I’ve corrected the Saharon Shelah page and will review the other pages I categorized to check which of them are missing a reference in the article. EntropyReducingGuy(I talk, but can reply slowly)💧♾️➡❄️📚 18:00, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you, verifying info coming from other wikis is the correct way to edit. En-wiki has much sticter requirements for referencing than Wikipedias in other languages. --Altenmann >talk 21:52, 7 October 2025 (UTC)