User talk:Epsilon.Prota

Archives

Removing my stuff

Why u removing my stuff who even are u mate you don’t know anything Wikipedisedit (talk) 22:09, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - as stated on your talk page, any information added to Wikipedia must be verifiable from another source. I'm sure the statements you added are true, but if they aren't listed in a reputable online source or published material we can reference, then they can't remain on Wikipedia. Happy to help if you have any more questions. Epsilon.Prota ^talk 22:14, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

which particular additions do you reference? 2600:4041:562F:B400:D14B:EDBE:1D86:1307 (talk) 11:37, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! The reliable sources are videos on YouTube of the Indiana Christmas parade. You can also find many sources on other sites about the Christmas parade. I do only have a small source of the Indiana junior high schools spirt band playing a bit before the parade and this is, there are a few newspaper pages and when I was younger I played in that band! I have lived in Indiana for a long time so I wouldn't lie about the parade. Its an amazing sight to see MillieMcGhen (talk) 18:38, 7 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, but as most videos on YouTube are anonymous, self-published, and unverifiable, they can't be used as a reference. If you can find online copies of the newspaper pages or reputable sites including the information, then you can read more about how to cite them here. Epsilon.Prota ^talk 22:16, 7 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

+rollback

Hi Epsilon.Prota,

After reviewing your request, I have added your account to the rollback group. Keep in mind these things when using rollback:

Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
Users should be informed (or warned) after their edits have been reverted. If warnings repeatedly don't help, WP:ANI is the default place to go. In cases of very clear ongoing intentional damage to the encyclopedia, WP:AIV can be used.
Reverting someone's edits may confuse or upset them. Whenever other users message you on your talk page, please take the time to respond to their concerns; accountability is important. For most users who message you, the tone and quality of your answer will permanently influence their opinion about Wikipedia in general.
Because the plain default rollback link does not provide any explanatory edit summary, it must not be used to revert good faith contributions, even if these contributions are disruptive. Take the time to write a proper summary whenever you're dealing with a lack of neutrality or verifiability; a short explanation like "[[WP:NPOV|not neutral]]" or "[[WP:INTREF|Please provide a citation]]" is helpful.
Rollback may never be used to edit war, which you'll notice to be surprisingly tempting in genuine content disputes. Please especially keep the three-revert rule in mind. If you see others edit warring, please file a report at WP:ANEW. The most helpful essay I've ever seen is WP:DISCFAIL; it is especially important for those who review content regularly.
If you encounter private information or threats of physical harm during your patrols, please quickly use Special:EmailUser/Oversight or Special:EmailUser/Emergency; ideally bookmark these pages now. See WP:OS and WP:EMERGENCY for details. If you're regularly patrolling recent changes, you will need both contacts sooner or later, and you'll be happy about the bookmarks.

To try rollback for the first time, you may like to make an edit to WP:Sandbox, and another one, and another one, and then revert the row with one click. I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about rollback. Thank you for your time and work in cleaning up Wikipedia. Happy editing!

Best regards,
~ ToBeFree (talk) 12:22, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

G-Baby Buggz

hello, sorry about that, I was editing the wrong wiki page. G-Baby Buggz (talk) 21:47, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reflinks added

Apologies. I didn't realize I had neglected to add the reflinks re edits to Jessica Dragonette. Should be OK, now. ([1]). Yours, 65.88.88.56 (talk) 22:07, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No problem - thanks very much for letting me know! Epsilon.Prota ^talk 22:11, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The original rollback did not specify a cause or reason, so I assumed it was erroneous. 65.88.88.56 (talk) 22:23, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes that can be frustrating - the quick-revert tool I use prompts for a talk page template which helps avoid that sort of thing Epsilon.Prota ^talk 22:25, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Signature

Hello! I noticed your signature, the "Talk" text seems to have an incorrect link, as it doesn't lead to your talk page. Just a heads-up in case it's a mistake. - Arcrev1 (talk) 17:26, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Arcrev1 Thanks for catching that! A colon went walkabout in the markup... Epsilon.Prota ^talk 17:59, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

My change got reversed

It said the population was 22,000 . What? Ethnologue gives 33,000 speakers (1980), Andrews (1989) gives 45,000 speakers, Feuerstein (1983) 250,000 speakers, Holisky (1991) estimates it between 50,000 and 500,000. I changed it to 45,000 to 500,000, since that's what's more credible, plus it's sourced. So why did you change ? IT IS MORE CREDIBLE 82.16.126.180 (talk) 15:41, 2 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That is me . I just forgot to log in . So can you NOT change it if I change it back .Thank you for your understanding and cooperation . ThatOneBoyFromEssex (talk) 15:48, 2 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - which change are you referring to? Epsilon.Prota ^talk 16:15, 2 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

August 2025

which particular additions do you reference? 2600:4041:562F:B400:D14B:EDBE:1D86:1307 (talk) 11:37, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Much of the content you added with these edits is not supported by a reliable source and so has been removed. Epsilon.Prota ^talk 11:46, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

My Little Pony: Twinkle Wish Adventure

Sorry about that. Lynch 44 23:53, 6 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No worries! Epsilon.Prota ^talk 23:53, 6 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Georg Ludwig Ulex has been accepted

Georg Ludwig Ulex, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 22% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Lijil (talk) 16:43, 11 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes#Requirements to accept an edit, when to accept an edit

* Pppery * _{it has begun...} 01:27, 12 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary account IP viewer granted

Hello, Epsilon.Prota. Per your request, your account has been granted temporary account IP viewer rights. You are now able to reveal the IP addresses of individuals using temporary accounts that are not visible to the general public. This is very sensitive information that is only to be used to aid in anti-abuse workflows. Please take a moment to review Wikipedia:Temporary account IP viewer for more information on this user right. It is important to remember:

You must not share IP address data with someone who does not have the same access permissions unless disclosure is permissible as per guidelines listed at Foundation:Policy:Wikimedia Access to Temporary Account IP Addresses Policy.
Access should not be used for political control, to apply pressure on editors, or as a threat against another editor in a content dispute. There must be a valid reason to investigate a temporary user. Note that using multiple temporary accounts is not forbidden, so long as they are not used in violation of policies (for example, block or ban evasion).

It is also important to note that the following actions are logged for others to see:

When a user accepts the preference that enables or disables IP reveal for their account.
Revealing an IP address of a temporary account.
Listing the temporary accounts that are associated with an IP address or CIDR range.

Remember, even if a user is violating policy, avoid revealing personal information if possible. Use temporary account usernames rather than disclosing IP addresses directly, or give information such as same network/not same network or similar. If you do not want the user right anymore then please ask me or another administrator and it will be removed for you. You may also voluntarily give up access at any time by visiting Special:Preferences. Happy editing! * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 01:28, 12 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate? Where

You stated that you have removed a duplicate sentence. I disagree, there is no other place in the opening paragraph which states this. Please undo your revert.123.103.210.114 (talk) 12:34, 12 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@123.103.210.114 →Pageantry - Barber was additionally the first member of the military to win the Miss USA title and declared her intentions to promote veterans issues during her reign.

Apologies if my edit summary was a little vague - I didn't mean solely in the lead, but that the fact she is the first member of the military to win is already in the article. I don't think the point is really significant enough to bear reiteration. If you'd like to continue this discussion, let's move to the associated talk page. Epsilon.Prota ^talk 12:42, 12 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This has been discussed on the talk page so please do not delete it. 123.103.210.114 (talk) 13:41, 12 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You are an ugly creep

End it 84.3.54.24 (talk) 14:16, 12 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sydney Evening Herald publication is untrue and is not sourced itself.

Good afternoon, the article which is being referenced is based on a fabrication. There is no means of disproving the allegations which were made but they are also not substantiated in any way in the article. The inclusion of this information factually incorrect and the publication have been contacted to correct their allegation. LeslieArchives (talk) 14:51, 12 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@LeslieArchives - re Sir John Leslie, 4th Baronet - Thank you for letting me know, but until the SMH issues a retraction or you can supply an opposing source for your claim, then the SMH reference will be taken as reliable. If you find any other references supporting your position, please add them to the article or hightlight them on its talk page. Epsilon.Prota ^talk 14:57, 12 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good morning, please note the claim has now been removed from the article and the reference cited is no longer correct. I have edited the article. https://scanner.topsec.com/?d=2661&r=show&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.smh.com.au%2Ftraveller%2Finspiration%2Fcastle-leslie-county-monaghan-ireland-the-beautiful-irish-castle-thats-played-host-to-a-series-of-misfits-20180702-h1249t.html&t=7c4220b92ca6cd9cd1f652d6d81a1e78307541ee — Preceding unsigned comment added by LeslieArchives (talk • contribs) 09:33, 13 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @LeslieArchives, thanks for letting me know. I can't view the article unfortunately, but I'll take your word for it. Epsilon.Prota ^talk 11:31, 13 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

New page reviewer granted

Hi Epsilon.Prota, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the new page reviewer user right to your account. This means you now have access to the page curation tools and can start patrolling pages from the new pages feed. If you asked for this at requests for permissions, please check back there to see if your access is time-limited or if there are other comments.

This is a good time to re-acquaint yourself with the guidance at Wikipedia:New pages patrol. Before you get started, please take the time to:

Add Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers to your watchlist to follow NPP-related discussions
If you use Twinkle, configure it to log your CSDs and PRODs
If you can read any languages other than English, add yourself to the list of reviewers with language proficiencies

You can find a list of other useful links and tools for patrollers at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Resources. If you are ever unsure what to do, ask your fellow patrollers or just leave the page for someone else to review – you're not alone! _signed,Rosguill ^talk 15:42, 14 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Finham

i see that you have been removingmy links about Finham's languages and history. In Finham we truly do have our own language but many think we are just joking but it is true! Can you please advise us on a way to add that on wikipedia 2A02:C7C:C44C:1600:E0CC:EE93:886C:F846 (talk) 14:53, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @User:2A02:C7C:C44C:1600:E0CC:EE93:886C:F846! All content added to Wikipedia must be supported by a verifiable and reliable source. If you can find one online or in a book, you can read about how to reference it properly here. Epsilon.Prota ^talk 14:56, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

sadly the only references i have is the Linguifex site 2A02:C7C:C44C:1600:E0CC:EE93:886C:F846 (talk) 15:00, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@User:2A02:C7C:C44C:1600:E0CC:EE93:886C:F846 - as the Linguifex article itself is unreferenced and can be edited by anyone, unfortunately it can't be used as a reliable source. You might consider sending the user Linguman a message on Linguifex as I see they are responsible for creating the article recently [2]. Epsilon.Prota ^talk 15:05, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

that is me 2A02:C7C:C44C:1600:27F4:D432:319:721D (talk) 15:09, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]