User talk:Gommeh

Gommeh
User Page - Talk Page - Guestbook - Contributions - User scripts - Sandbox
Welcome to my user section! Please feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or sign my guest book.

Welcome to my talk page!

Hello! Please leave a new message. I will respond to your message as soon as possible. Thanks and happy editing!

Also take care of the following points:

If I left you a message; please answer on your talk page, using {{ping|Username}}, {{reply to|Username}} or {{u|Username}} in your response, or add {{talkback|Username}} or {{whisperback|Username}} to my talk page. And if you leave me a message; I will answer on my talk page, using {{ping|Username}} or {{u|Username}} in my response, or add {{talkback|Username}} or {{whisperback|Username}} to your talk page.
Please post your new topic at the bottom of this page or at the bottom of the respective section, and use a new ==Descriptive heading== for new topics.
Indent your comment when replying by using an appropriate number of colons ":"
Sign and date your entry by inserting four tildes "~~~~" at the end of your message.
I will generally respond here to comments that are posted here, rather than replying via your talk page (or the article talk page, if you are writing to me here about an article), so you may want to watch this page until you are responded to, or specifically let me know where you'd prefer the reply.
Avoid personal attacks, do not troll or use this page as a chat room.
Please, always assume good faith.
If the topic is something personal, please email me and leave {{ygm}} on my talk page.
And if you are impressed by my contributions, consider giving me some WikiLove.

⇒Start a new topic⇐

Archives

Gommeh does not mind criticism. Feel free to let him know if he did something wrong. He also thinks you should do the same to anyone else as long as you follow some basic guidelines: remain civil, assume good faith and don't bite.

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Gommeh. Thank you for your work on University Institute of the Argentine Federal Police. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for taking the time to create this article! Have a beautiful and blessed weekend!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ Contact me! 01:00, 6 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your nomination of Natlan (Genshin Impact) is under review

Your good article nomination of the article Natlan (Genshin Impact) is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Nub098765 -- Nub098765 (talk) 06:06, 6 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your nomination of Natlan (Genshin Impact) is on hold

Your good article nomination of the article Natlan (Genshin Impact) has been placed on hold, as the article needs some changes. See the review page for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Nub098765 -- Nub098765 (talk) 22:07, 7 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Got it. I'll do some work on it tomorrow - would do so tonight but I'm a little tipsy right now and don't want to edit under the influence, lol. Gommeh 📖/🎮 23:24, 7 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your nomination of Natlan (Genshin Impact) has passed

Your good article nomination of the article Natlan (Genshin Impact) has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Nub098765 -- Nub098765 (talk) 19:24, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Congrats on creating the good article "Natlan (Genshin Impact)"! SuperGrey (talk) 01:11, 9 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:JohnDavies9612

Latest Malay user struggling with language, i cleared some articles. Adress his talk page, reply expected. 93.140.240.130 (talk) 03:56, 9 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Gave them the welcome message for non native English speakers, thanks! Gommeh 📖/🎮 13:30, 9 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Drumeo

Hello, Gommeh,

Thank you for creating Drumeo.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Could you add references for some of the claims, such as "known for its youtube content" or claims about the number of packages sold. It will help improve the article.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Noxoug1}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Noxoug1 (talk) 07:53, 9 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Noxoug1: done, also the article is not an orphan as several articles link to it: Special:WhatLinksHere/Drumeo Gommeh 📖/🎮 13:29, 9 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @Gommeh Looks really nice. Noxoug1 (talk) 08:17, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WP:GARP archive

Hi, I don't quite understand why you did this. It looks to me as if you made a pledge, someone reviewed your article, then you reviewed Deus Ex, so everything with your pledge worked as expected. Is there some non-obvious reason to hide this one from the archives? The fact that your pledged review ended up failing the article is of no consequence here, see Wikipedia:Good article review pledges/Archive: back when we were still tracking pass/fail, a pretty much normal percentage of noms ended up in fails.

Or do you think your Deus Ex review did not fulfil your pledge? In that case we should move it back to unfulfilled and wait for you to do another review. —Kusma (talk) 08:50, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh ok, wasn't quite sure how it worked. Feel free to re-add to archives. I thought it was supposed to be removed once done. lol. Gommeh 📖/🎮 10:32, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The archive is mainly there so we can see how successful WP:GARP is :) We had roughly 140 reviews connected to GARP since late June, about as many as WP:GARC gets done in a year. —Kusma (talk) 15:09, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Hellen Pigeon (14:04, 10 September 2025)

Hi Gommeh, and thanks for offering support as a mentor. I'm a published author in the fields of economic and civilizational history, and I’ve been exploring how to contribute to Wikipedia responsibly — especially on topics I’ve written about. I understand the conflict of interest policy and recently tried to follow the {{Edit COI}} process after an edit was reverted. I’m now wondering what my best next steps are.

Since my book is recent, it hasn’t yet been widely cited. Should I wait several months (or longer) before contributing again to related articles? Or are there ways I can contribute as an expert in the field without crossing promotional lines?

I’m happy to take a long-term, policy-aligned approach — just looking for guidance on what’s actually possible at this stage.

Many thanks in advance. --Hellen Pigeon (talk) 14:04, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Hellen Pigeon and thanks for reaching out. I'm glad to see you're taking an interest in learning about our policies and guidelines. With regard to citing yourself, please see the guidelines at WP:SELFCITE. If you're still not sure, perhaps try asking at the Teahouse.

You should never feel as if your contributions aren't welcome, however, so if you're concerned about the risk of self-promotion and still want to contribute to Wikipedia, you can always use other sources. You say you're a published author, so perhaps if you don't feel comfortable citing your own work you can cite the sources you used in your published works. Happy editing! Gommeh 📖/🎮 14:32, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fontaine (Genshin Impact), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Montage.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:58, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Fictional elements introduced in 2025

A tag has been placed on Category:Fictional elements introduced in 2025 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:11, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]