User talk:Hey man im josh
![]() |
|
This is Hey man im josh's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26Auto-archiving period: 15 days ![]() |
![]() | This talk page is automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. Any threads with no replies in 75 days may be automatically moved. Sections without timestamps are not archived. |
![]() | This user talk page might be watched by friendly talk page stalkers, which means that someone other than me might reply to your query. Their input is welcome and their help with messages that I cannot reply to quickly is appreciated. |
You again???
[edit]Why do you hurt me, Josh? I thought we had an understanding. Yet, you continue to light those fires up there!!!! Regards, John. :) Bringingthewood (talk) 22:12, 5 August 2025 (UTC)
- Well, no more smoke here .. hope all is well up north. John. Bringingthewood (talk) 23:59, 19 August 2025 (UTC)
- Oh man, I forgot to reply to this, but I was confused and it finally just clicked for me lol. Yeah, all is well where I'm at, and I hope the same for you. Hey man im josh (talk) 11:51, 20 August 2025 (UTC)
- LOL! Yeah, the first couple of lines were going down a different road. It was all in fun. That's good to hear and all is well by me, thank you. Enjoy the rest of your week! John. Bringingthewood (talk) 23:03, 20 August 2025 (UTC)
- Oh man, I forgot to reply to this, but I was confused and it finally just clicked for me lol. Yeah, all is well where I'm at, and I hope the same for you. Hey man im josh (talk) 11:51, 20 August 2025 (UTC)
- Well, no more smoke here .. hope all is well up north. John. Bringingthewood (talk) 23:59, 19 August 2025 (UTC)
Question
[edit]Can a twin be notable on its own? I created the article Dylan Tuomy-Wilhoit (which I redirected) like exactly a year ago and he is a twin of actor Blake Tuomy-Wilhoit. They were both twins and were main cast in Full House, their only acting credit. His twin Blake was only an actor, but for Dylan he's also an Emmy-winning sound editor with four Primetime Emmy Awards wins and with seven more nominations. I have added two newspapers sources in the article and I believe he is notable on his own, but mostly I just want your opinion if I should turn the redirect back into an article. (talk) 06:40, 6 August 2025 (UTC)
- Hey @MoviesandTelevisionFan, sorry for the delay in replying, I've not been very active as of late. Based strictly on what you've said, the twin (Blake) sounds entirely irrelevant in this case. The main thing is that Dylan has 4 awards and 7 nominations, that's pretty significant, and at least worth giving a shot to expanding and making its own article if you're up for it. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:06, 21 August 2025 (UTC)
Lou Pomanti
[edit]Hi Josh, I see that you deleted Draft:Low Pomanti on Oct 2, 2023. I am creating a new draft for Lou Pomanti, a Canadian musician. I was not involved in the deleted draft, I don't know if it's the same Low Pomanti. Should I create a new draft? Or do we need to restore the old one. Thanks SquidX (talk) 22:46, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
- Hi Josh, do you have any opinion on this? If I don't hear back soon, I will create a new draft. SquidX (talk) 12:57, 19 August 2025 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit]![]() |
The Special Barnstar |
Thanks so much, Josh. That’s an incredibly kind message and it means a lot to know my work has been useful. However, right back at you, you’ve shown again and again that Wikipedia isn’t just about articles, it’s about the people who build them. Your encouragement, good humour, and ability to lift others up make this place better every day. qcne (talk) 18:40, 16 August 2025 (UTC) |
Your RfA
[edit]I see you've just thanked me for supporting you in your overwhelmingly successful RFA. I'm wondering why? Have you thanked all the support voters, almost two years after the !voting? I'm not complaining, I'm just puzzled. Maproom (talk) 07:03, 19 August 2025 (UTC)
- I came here wondering the same thing. ― Blaze WolfTalkblaze__wolf 22:01, 25 August 2025 (UTC)
This arbitration case has been closed and the final decision is available at the link above. The following remedies have been enacted:
- The existing Manual of Style and article titles contentious topic is amended, to narrow the scope to only apply to article titles and capitalisation. The contentious topic area is to be renamed "Wikipedia:Contentious topics/Article titles and capitalisation", and the exact scope is available at the final decision page.
- The word limit restriction (discretionary) is added to the standard set of contentious topic restrictions for all contentious topics:
Uninvolved administrators may impose word limits on all participants in a discussion, or on individual editors across all discussions, within a specific contentious topic area. Citations and quotations (whether from sources, Wikipedia articles, Wikipedia discussions, or elsewhere) do not count toward the word limit. These restrictions must be logged and may be appealed in the same way as all contentious topic restrictions.
- Dicklyon (talk · contribs) is indefinitely banned from Wikipedia. This ban may be appealed twelve months after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter.
- The Arbitration Committee assumes the indefinite topic ban of Dicklyon. This restriction may be appealed twelve months after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter.
- Dicklyon is indefinitely topic banned from challenging or requesting a review of any closure within the article titles and capitalisation contentious topic area, broadly construed. This restriction may be appealed twelve months after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter.
- Cinderella157 (talk · contribs) and SMcCandlish (talk · contribs) are indefinitely topic banned from the article titles and capitalisation contentious topic area, broadly construed. These restrictions may be appealed twelve months after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter.
- Cinderalla157, SMcCandlish, and Dicklyon are limited to 500 words in any discussion related to the article titles and capitalisation contentious topic area, broadly construed.
- Hey man im josh (talk · contribs) is warned for edit warring.
For the Arbitration Committee, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 23:47, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- Discuss this at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard § Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Article titles and capitalisation 2 closed
New pages patrol September 2025 Backlog drive
[edit]September 2025 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol | ![]() |
| |
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:31, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
A brownie for you!
[edit]![]() |
I've been wanting to make brownies lately, and figured I'd send you some virtual ones. You've been a friendly |
August 2025
[edit]Now that the albatross is gone from around your neck, I'm hoping you can breathe a little easier and find joy in what you do here again! Bgsu98 (Talk) 00:20, 25 August 2025 (UTC)
- Was coming here to say something along the same lines. Hope all is looking up in Josh-land. Ed [talk] [OMT] 05:41, 25 August 2025 (UTC)
Feedback request: Wikipedia policies and guidelines request for comment
[edit]
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Years on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
(trialing replacing Yapperbot) SodiumBot (botop|talk) 04:30, 27 August 2025 (UTC)