Jump to content

User talk:Leo Caliri

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Telna Inc. (September 18)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pythoncoder was:
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 17:34, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Leo Caliri! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 17:34, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

September 2025

[edit]
Information icon

Hello Leo Caliri. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Telna Inc., gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Leo Caliri. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Leo Caliri|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 19:49, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Thanks for the reply. I disclosed that I am a Telna employee in my sandbox page, but it that's not enough, how can I be more clear with that? Also, what do you recommend me to do in order to have a better chance on publishing a optimal revision of the article? Leo Caliri (talk) 20:07, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You said in an edit summary that you are "affiliated"; aside from the ambiguous term "affiliated", an edit summary is not a highly visible place(it ends up buried in the edit history). You should post the template described above({{paid|user=Leo Caliri|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}) on your user page, User:Leo Caliri. 331dot (talk) 20:25, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! I'll use that. Leo Caliri (talk) 21:05, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]