User talk:Richard Dotx

June 2025

Hello Richard Dotx. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Raja Rani Coaching, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Richard Dotx. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Richard Dotx|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Sam Kuru (talk) 13:20, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

Hello @Kuru

I would like to clarify that I am not connected with Raja Rani Coaching in any direct or indirect way. I am not being compensated for my edits, nor do I have any affiliation with the organization.

I came across Raja Rani Coaching through its feature on national television, specifically on SET India and Shark Tank India, and I found it to be an interesting subject worth documenting on Wikipedia.

My intention in drafting the article was purely voluntary and interest-based. I am still gathering more reliable and independent sources to enhance the draft and ensure compliance with Wikipedia's standards.

For your reference, here are the national television appearances I mentioned:

• Shark Tank India Feature – SET India
• Business Pitch on Shark Tank Richard Dotx (talk) 06:27, 6 June 2025 (UTC)

Dadasaheb Phalke International Film Festival is not notable; please stop trying to add it

Please do not attempt to make unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been disallowed by an edit filter. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. 14:56, 24 June 2025 (UTC) – PharyngealImplosive7 (talk) 14:56, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

I don't see anything wrong with the article?

The guy is pretty popular not sure how you are saying he's not notable. Scottlinehan1999 (talk) 14:57, 6 July 2025 (UTC)

Nomination of Jay Patel for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jay Patel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jay Patel until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

LKBT (talk) 05:46, 8 July 2025 (UTC)

Pujaniya Raseshwari Devi Ji moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Pujaniya Raseshwari Devi Ji. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Thilsebatti (talk) 06:01, 19 July 2025 (UTC)

July 2025

You have used sources that are either clearly noted as paid placement, unmarked press releases or marketing content, or blatant fake content farms which house unmarked SEO placement. One of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. These sources step far beyond those policies. Please carefully evaluate your references in the future, and ensure that you are in compliance with our mandatory paid editing disclosures. Sam Kuru (talk) 21:38, 19 July 2025 (UTC)

Please consider this a final warning. If you continue to use SEO/PR sources, or junk paid placement / advertorials, this account will be blocked. Sam Kuru (talk) 21:38, 19 July 2025 (UTC)

• indianbusinesstimes.com: Linksearch en - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C Cross-wiki • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced • COIBot-Local - COIBot-XWiki - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.org • Live link: http://spam.indianbusinesstimes.com
• timesbull.com: Linksearch en - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C Cross-wiki • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced • COIBot-Local - COIBot-XWiki - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.org • Live link: http://spam.timesbull.com

Nomination of Jaya Thakur for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jaya Thakur is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jaya Thakur until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Thilsebatti (talk) 02:59, 21 July 2025 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Thesolicitors per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Thesolicitors. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  PhilKnight (talk) 03:42, 25 July 2025 (UTC)