User talk:Space.tracker.nerd

New to this!

Pretty cool to get to add to human knowledge! I'm mostly here for space exploration organizations and people as its what I like to follow in my free time. Please do let me know how to be better, I'm in the process of reading wikipedia's documentation for new users but thought I'd jump in straight away! Space.tracker.nerd (talk) 01:54, 19 July 2025 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hi Space.tracker.nerd! I noticed your contributions to Alan Eustace and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! TJRC (talk) 03:28, 24 July 2025 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:NASA 20-Foot Chamber has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:NASA 20-Foot Chamber. Thanks! Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 17:05, 25 July 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: NASA 20-Foot Chamber has been accepted

NASA 20-Foot Chamber, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 17:06, 25 July 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: NASA Exploration Atmosphere Tests has been accepted

NASA Exploration Atmosphere Tests, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Agent 007 (talk) 16:07, 29 July 2025 (UTC)

August 2025

Hello, I'm Jlwoodwa. An article that you recently made, MoonDAO, seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or another application using such technology). Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and output must be carefully checked. In particular, you should check each citation, and fictitious references must be removed. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. jlwoodwa (talk) 05:34, 8 August 2025 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of MoonDAO

Hello Space.tracker.nerd,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged MoonDAO for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

JBchrch talk 08:24, 9 August 2025 (UTC)

Hello JBchrch, Thanks for letting me know. I'm fairly new to wikipedia and am still finding my way around. I'll go ahead and do my best at leaving a note on your talk page. I would like to contest the deletion and perhaps give it another go for this page as I think it is incredibly noteworthy. Space.tracker.nerd (talk) 20:45, 13 August 2025 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Space.tracker.nerd, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz Read! Talk! 22:05, 13 August 2025 (UTC)

Thank you! Space.tracker.nerd (talk) 22:13, 13 August 2025 (UTC)

Aaron Charles Newman moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Aaron Charles Newman, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. SPOOKYDICAE👻 17:02, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for the feedback and moving to draftspace! How many more reliable, independent sources do you think should be needed for approval? The independent sources confirm his spaceflight as a research subject, his expedition to the bottom of the ocean, etc. The general notability guideline seems that I could make the arguement that its ready for publication now. Appreciate the feedback! I'm still learning. Space.tracker.nerd (talk) 05:24, 15 October 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Blue Origin NS-36 (October 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Shocksingularity was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Blue Origin NS-36 instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Blue Origin NS-36 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Shocksingularity (talk) 20:27, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

Roger all. I created the article before but the other user got theirs approved first. All good! I added a few items to the current published article. Space.tracker.nerd (talk) 05:26, 15 October 2025 (UTC)