User talk:WeatherWriter

Tanner Newspapers.com search

I know you're no longer active here but given I don't have access to Discord at the moment, I hail-mary'ed looking up the caption to the one Tanner image I told you about yesterday and it worked - this result (p. 13, The Huntsville Times, April 5, 1974) contains the image. May also be PD but I'll let you evaluate that. ^EF⁵ 03:50, 5 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You will be missed

Hi, WeatherWriter, I’m sorry if you didn’t wish to see any talk page messages, but I want you to know you will be missed. You have been a vital editor for WikiProject Weather, and have organized some amazing projects and are a collaborative editor I have always looked up to. Hope you are doing well in your personal life, and I hope you eventually return. Hurricane Wind and Fire (talk) 06:09, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome back!

Welcome back, and I hope you stay. Was missing you; note that the email I talked about sending at the former ANI report was not actioned on, so I was in the wrong there. You are back in just in time - the first EF5 in almost 13 years was confirmed about an hour ago. My email or Discord DMs are always open if you need something or just need someone to talk to. :) ^EF⁵ 16:04, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am not fully back. I will still be semi-retired. I do not want to write full articles anymore. You may see me from time-to-time to do formatting or brief rewrites (sort of like TornadoInformation12). I'll be much more active on the Commons. WeatherWriter (talk) 16:06, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 6

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of F5, EF5, and IF5 tornadoes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Sills.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:01, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Disagreements on the intensity of tornadoes for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Disagreements on the intensity of tornadoes, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Disagreements on the intensity of tornadoes until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 9 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:A bathtub deeply impaled into the ground from the first 1974 Tanner tornado.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:A bathtub deeply impaled into the ground from the first 1974 Tanner tornado.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:04, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]