Jump to content

Wikipedia talk:Noticeboard for India-related topics

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is a noticeboard for things particularly relevant to Wikipedians working on articles on India.
Article alerts for WikiProject India

Did you know

Articles for deletion

(102 more...)

Proposed deletions

(19 more...)

Categories for discussion

(52 more...)

Templates for discussion

Redirects for discussion

Files for discussion

Featured list candidates

Good article nominees

(7 more...)

Featured article reviews

Good article reassessments

Requests for comments

Peer reviews

Requested moves

(1 more...)

Articles to be merged

(24 more...)

Articles to be split

(15 more...)

Articles for creation

(74 more...)

This table is updated daily by a bot

Wikipedia Meetups edit
Upcoming
none
Recent
Outside India
Past meetups

Please make changes to Delhi NCR article

[edit]

Article is protected. I have suggested edits on talk page which just requires a registered editrs to copy paste my text on article talk page to apply to the article. Please make the changes, please see Talk:National_Capital_Region_(India)#Semi-protected_edit_request_on_16_September_2025. Please remove the protected status from article. Thanks. 220.255.242.109 (talk) 13:04, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Noticeboard discussion on reliability of WION

[edit]

There is a noticeboard discussion on the reliability of WION (World Is One News). If you are interested, please participate at WP:RSN § Reliability of WION. — Newslinger talk 21:56, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please participate and undelete

[edit]

List_of_institutions_with_Sanskrit_mottos was deleted, seems without much discussion and with no involvement who are keen on Sanskrit and India. Please participate and help undelete/refund/restore Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_institutions_with_Sanskrit_mottos as the editors on India Project are more suited to decide on it. Thank you. 220.255.242.109 (talk) 05:31, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Birth date changes

[edit]

I'm hoping someone can check changes to birth dates by 43.227.227.16. For example, diff at Gajraj Rao. In a quick look, I can't see where a source mentions some of the birth dates. If I could see evidence that the IP's edits are bad, I would revert the edits and issue a long block. Johnuniq (talk) 04:27, 21 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please add reliable sources. Bearian (talk) 10:27, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Shaktism

[edit]

Shaktism has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 00:42, 24 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Guru Chandrasekharan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Tagged as Unreferenced for 10 years. Tagged for Notability for a month. No other language has a reliably sourced article from which to translate. The Telugu language article has no references.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bearian (talk) 02:42, 24 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Deprodded. Bearian (talk) 02:00, 29 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

My Choice (2015 film)

[edit]

Greetings, Requesting some draft article expansion and c/e help in the draft User:Bookku/My Choice (2015 film) article if you find above topic interested in. Bookku (talk) 15:04, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Baba Gangeshwarnath Dham has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Tagged as Unreferenced for 6 years. Tagged for Notability concerns for 2 months. No other language has a reliably sourced article from which to translate. There is no real assertion of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bearian (talk) 01:58, 29 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:List of Hindu empires and dynasties#Requested move 14 September 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. TarnishedPathtalk 11:39, 29 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Dev Adhikari#Requested move 6 September 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. TarnishedPathtalk 11:50, 29 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Larry Sanger's war on Wikipedia

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Larry Sanger spills the beans to Tucker Carlson: https://x.com/JasonJournoDC/status/1972769213644173385. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 19:31, 30 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You're better off sniffing glue than watching those two fawn at each other. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 19:42, 30 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Reporting you for egregious violations of Wikipedia's civility policies. Do better, dude. 2601:600:817F:B270:E074:533E:91D4:833D (talk) 20:51, 30 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
No lies (nor incivility) detected. Bearian (talk) 21:46, 30 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
A "community note" (a twitter fact-checking mechanism) proposed for the post cites this article for arguing that black-listing sources leads to bias. https://www.emerald.com/oir/article/48/5/908/1220830/Polarization-and-reliability-of-news-sources-in -- Kautilya3 (talk) 09:29, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sanger has also started arguing that Wikipedia is anti-Hindu, citing one of the black-listed sources. The source actually calls it "anti-India". https://x.com/lsanger/status/1973048318373577121 -- Kautilya3 (talk) 09:32, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There's many valid criticisms of Wikipedia, and then there's Larry Sanger. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested «@» °∆t° 11:10, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

I encourage people to follow the last thread mentioned above. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 09:56, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]