મતદાન કરવા માટે {{તરફેણ}}, {{વિરોધ}} અને {{તટસ્થ}} ઢાંચાઓ વાપરી શકાય છે.
દરેક નિવેદન બીજા સભ્યોની ટિપ્પણી મેળવવા માટે ઓછામાં ઓછું ૧ અઠવાડિયા સુધી ચાલુ રહેશે, મતદાનનું પરિણામ જાહેર થઇ ગયા પછી જે પરિણામ આવે તે મુજબ સ્થિતિ (status =) બદલવી.
(આપનું મંતવ્ય) Nokib Sarkar (ચર્ચા) ૦૨:૨૮, ૯ એપ્રિલ ૨૦૨૪ (IST)
This bot is a part of the tool CampWiz which assists organizers of various edit-a-thon to host, manage campaign, evaluate submissions, publish results (As of now, about 40 campaigns were hosted and 8000+ articles were submitted through this tool). One of its sibling tool helps organizers to generate a list of articles which are not present on their wiki based on topic (As of now, 233636+articles in 150+ lists were harvested). One of our main targets was to reduce the security issue and liability along with privacy issue. As such, this tool uses a single bot account to interact with mediawiki which eliminates the need of storing the user's access token on the server. As of now, the bot would perform the following tasks. In order to prevent spamming, all the edits on user talk pages would be done by batch hourly, rather than immediately.[ઉત્તર]
trackingTemplate: This bot would add a template (configured by the campaign organizers) on the talk page of an article if it does not already exist, whenever that article is submitted into a campaign.
notifyEvaluation: This bot would add a message on submitter's talk page if any of his submissions get any evaluation by the judge (including any note that judge left).
notifyNewSubmission (opt-in only): This bot would add a message containing new submission that were added on the talk page of the user who volunterily consented to have updates.
notifyStatistics (opt-in only): This bot would periodically give statistics update about the campaign the user opted-in. (For future reference)
To demonstrate the functionalities, please look at the edits on mrwiki. All the templates that the bot uses should be localized too. These are:
તટસ્થ It is not clear what changes does this bot intend to do. Adding note/template on the talkpage etc. is done manually anyways as part of the submission and guidelines on the project page. Moreover, if this bot is going to touch only the competition related pages then I am ok, however, volume of submissions/articles created/edited part of any competition is never too high on this wiki. So, even if the Bot does changes without bot flag, that won't have any impact.--ધવલચર્ચા/યોગદાન૧૩:૪૯, ૧૫ એપ્રિલ ૨૦૨૪ (IST)[ઉત્તર]
@ધવલ: Thank you very much for your question. I would like to answer your concerns below:
Adding note/template on the talkpage etc. is done manually anyways as part of the submission and guidelines on the project page: If a judge evaluates multiple articles in one go. It would be difficult for him to keep track of the submitters to be notified about the evaluation. Also, in that case, each judge would give notification about each article separately, which would be somewhat duplicate of the same message in participants talk page. Also, when a participant submits multiple articles in a single go, he would need to add tracker templates by himself for each of the articles. This bot would automate both of the things:
The bot would add the tracker template automatically even if the participant or the submitter did not add or forgot to add.
The bot would notify the submitter about evaluation in a batch, therefore preventing unnecessary messages. In each hour, the bot would give the submitter/participant only a single message about all the evaluations he got since last hour. The bot would not add any message if that participant did not get any new evaluation. For example, if the participant got 5 new evaluations in the last hour, the traditional manual way would add 5 separate messages from each of the judges. Also, each judge has to track which submitters to notify for which article. But, using the bot, each of the participant would get only a single message listing all the 5 evaluations at once. Also, the jury does not need to track whom to notify about which articles.
In a way, you are enforcing the guidelines automatically, rather than relying on human editors.
volume of submissions/articles created/edited part of any competition is never too high on this wiki. So, even if the Bot does changes without bot flag, that won't have any impact: I would answer this in two points:
It would not be high volume edits if you think each of the submissions individually. But, as I said earlier, the bot would work in batch. Therefore, in each batch, there would be evaluations + tracker templates. So that might flood the recentchanges without the bot flag.
The bot account come with a right called highlimits. It enables bot to query the mediawiki server without any ratelimit. It can drastically impact the performance of the tool. Nokib Sarkar (ચર્ચા) ૧૬:૧૪, ૧૫ એપ્રિલ ૨૦૨૪ (IST)[ઉત્તર]
I approve this request with caveat that the bot should only do edits on userpages of the users who participated in contest and pages/talk pages of Contest related pages only. This Bot shouldn't make or revert any other edits, etc. You can go ahead and request bot flag on meta.--ધવલચર્ચા/યોગદાન૧૬:૫૫, ૧૫ એપ્રિલ ૨૦૨૪ (IST)[ઉત્તર]
Kaimbot is created to automatically help improve article tagging and maintenance. Kaimbot is written in Python and hosted on Toolforge. This bot will automatically add the following templates to the appropriate pages:
The bot won't edit any page with the last edit less than 2 days ago. Some tests have been made on test wiki. I am requesting approval from the community to conduct a test run on guwiki and request a bot flag on Meta. Cheers -- Kaim Amin (ચર્ચા) ૨૧:૫૦, ૨૩ સપ્ટેમ્બર ૨૦૨૫ (IST)[ઉત્તર]
સમર્થન/વિરોધ/તટસ્થ
વિરુદ્ધ - I do not support this as ours being small wiki, many articles could fall within Category of Stub as per English wiki article length, but we might not consider them stub. Our substubs, for example, are the articles with only one sentense or a couple a of lines. If there is a paragraph written, we class it as stub instead of substub. SImilarly, the citation needed could be an overkill for many of the articles we have on the geographical topics, e.g. villages of Gujarat.--ધવલચર્ચા/યોગદાન૧૪:૦૫, ૨૯ સપ્ટેમ્બર ૨૦૨૫ (IST)[ઉત્તર]
The threshold for T:Stub is adjustable. For now, it is max 700 characters on the article source (including wikitext, weblinks, even comments). Also, I'll add T:Update when the last edit was made more than 900 days ago. I can set these numbers, minimum or maximum, to whatever the community decides.
I believe every article, even list articles, must have at least one information which requires a source. I'll add T:Unreferenced only when 0 references cited.
Thank you for your reply, however, I would prefer to leave it on human editors here to determine which article to mark as sub or stub instead of setting a threshold of bytes or number of characters. I still not see any point in having a bot flag on this wiki for these kind of edits.--ધવલચર્ચા/યોગદાન૨૧:૧૧, ૨૯ સપ્ટેમ્બર ૨૦૨૫ (IST)[ઉત્તર]
@Kaim Amin, Unfortunately no, that wasn't the only issue. If you refer to my original message, I have stated that even the 'Citation Needed' doesn't work for us here. And the other templates/flags we could easily insert using the existing Bots that are owned by Gujarati community members, who have knowledge of the language and community requirement/consensus. Thus, regrettably, I do not see this bot of any use for the Gujarati Wiki and hence, I oppose this request.--ધવલચર્ચા/યોગદાન૧૬:૩૬, ૩૦ સપ્ટેમ્બર ૨૦૨૫ (IST)[ઉત્તર]
આ એક વૈશ્વિક બોટ છે, જે કોમન્સ પરથી દૂર અને સ્થળાંતરિત થયેલ ફાઈલોની કડિયો સરખી કરવાનું કામ કરે છે. આ બોટને ઘણી બધી વિકિમાં બોટ ફ્લેગ પ્રાપ્ત છે. આ બોટના સંપાદનોની સમિક્ષા કરવાની અને તેમને વિશેષ:તાજાફેરફારોમાં દેખાડવાની કોઈ જરૂર નથી. -- કેપ્ટનવિરાજ (ચર્ચા) ૧૪:૪૯, ૧૫ જૂન ૨૦૨૦ (IST)[ઉત્તર]
