User talk:CommunityNotesContributor

Archives

This page has archives. Topics inactive for 180 days are automatically archived by if there are more than 10.

December 2025

You are involved in a recently filed request for clarification or amendment from the Arbitration Committee. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment#Clarification request: Palestine-Israel articles 5 and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the Wikipedia:Arbitration guide may be of use.

Thanks, Chess enjoyer (talk) 06:43, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Seasons greetings!

Wishing you and yours a fantastic Christmas (or holiday season for those who don’t celebrate) and all the best for 2026. 🎄 ❄️☃️

Here’s to a collaborative, constructive year ahead — with good faith, good edits, and just enough discussion to get things done!

(and here's Sir Nils Olav inspecting his troops... one of my favourite POTDs)

Cheers — Amakuru (talk) 15:12, 21 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

— Amakuru (talk) 15:12, 21 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for discussion of Template:Editnotices/Page/Tyler James Robinson

Template:Editnotices/Page/Tyler James Robinson has been nominated for discussion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 09:48, 24 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Holidays!

Hello CommunityNotesContributor: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, Iljhgtn (talk) 18:11, 24 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings}} to send this message

Iljhgtn (talk) 18:11, 24 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for discussion of Template:Editnotices/Page/Sharm El Sheikh summit

Template:Editnotices/Page/Sharm El Sheikh summit has been nominated for discussion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 23:31, 24 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red - January 2026

Women in Red | January 2026, Vol 12, Issue 1, Nos 357, 358, 359, 360

Online events:

New: Sports (year-long initiative) | Alphabet run - countries starting with A
Continuing: #1day1woman ( year-long initiative) | Women who died in 2025

Announcements from other communities

Wikipedia turns 25! Celebrate Wikipedia Day on Jan 15, 2026.

Tip of the month:

Consider becoming a new page reviewer to help reduce the huge backlog of women's biographies.

Other ways to participate:

Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications.
Join the conversations on our talkpage.
Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project.
Follow us on social media:

Instagram | Pinterest

--Rosiestep (talk) 23:30, 26 December 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

New pages patrol January–February 2026 Backlog drive

January–February 2026 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol

New Pages Patrol is hosting a one-time, two-month experimental backlog drive aimed at reducing the backlog. This will be a combo drive: both articles and redirects will earn points.

The drive will run from 1 January to 28 February 2026.
The drive is divided into two phases. Participants may take part in either phase or across both phases, depending on availability.
Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled during the drive.
Two-month drive-exclusive barnstars will be awarded to eligible participants.
Each article review earns 1 point, while each redirect review earns 0.2 points.
Streak awards will be granted based on consistently meeting weekly point thresholds.
Barnstars will also be awarded for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
Interested in participating? Sign up here.

You are receiving this message because you are a New Pages Patrol reviewer. To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself from here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:21, 27 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year, CommunityNotesContributor!

Happy New Year!

CommunityNotesContributor,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Abishe (talk) 16:42, 31 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Abishe (talk) 16:42, 31 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ARCA closed

Hello. The ARCA request you are were listed as an involved party for was closed and archived. It can be found at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment/Archive 134#Clarification request: Palestine-Israel articles 5. Sennecaster (Chat) 01:15, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Archiving CENT listings

Please remember to add discussions removed from CENT to the archive: Wikipedia:Centralized discussion/Archive. Toadspike [Talk] 20:39, 8 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry ~~had no idea that existed~~, will add the other. Thanks for letting me know! Edit: Technically I must have known as would of read it when adding an entry sometime ago, but forgot that part. CNC (talk) 20:40, 8 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Working on new sidebar template, curious if you'd like to help

Template:ICE Trump term 2 sidebar

It's poorly named. I also forgot how to draftify templates, so feel free to do so yourself. But I was very happy to see you in the Renee Good editing space so if you're interested I think this could be a very useful sidebar I'd love your help improving, especially with how immigration-related actions are a focal point of the Trump administrations and have many controversies. Alexandraaaacs1989 (talk) 14:00, 9 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Good to hear from you, I'm not that familiar with Trump-based immigration topics but looks like you know what you're doing. As you've mentioned it at the parent topic then there is just the template to add to the topics (which looks like you've been doing already). That and wait for anyone to complain about it, or criticise it. I'd wager it'd get kept if landed at TfD though. Regards, CNC (talk) 15:34, 9 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Pages with BLPCRIME talk notice has been nominated for deletion

Category:Pages with BLPCRIME talk notice has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:36, 10 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Could use second opinion on conflict

I left a trout at User talk:Nehushtani after I felt like he contributed to a discussion in an unproductive way. He responded pretty combatively, so I was hoping you could take a look at the conversation since I don't want to take this to the administrator noticeboard, but I also don't think he's really engaging with what I'm saying which is why I want a third opinion. If you have the time, thank you! Alexandraaaacs1989 (talk) 12:10, 11 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Trouting an editor, because their !vote in PIA topic was deemed to be of low quality, is quite frankly an awful idea. They are entitled to their vote regardless of perceived quality; it's not an error, thus not trout worthy.

Personally I wouldn't concern yourself with these types of votes, the rationale might extend to other editors who also made that argument (as the editor states), but if there isn't sourcing to back it up it's not an argument that will be taken seriously by a closer. So you don't need to point that out in a discussion, any decent closer should be able to recognise it, unless it's becoming a dominant viewpoint which actually requires countering; ergo not everything needs countering.

I'd just apologise for trouting and move on, before an admin asks you why you thought it was a good idea to trout an editor over their vote in a PIA RM. The unwritten rule would be never to trout someone for their argument in a discussion, only for mistakes they make, simply because nothing good will ever come out of it. From a not-so uninvolved perspective, going to their talk page looks like you are trying to badger them into changing their opinion/vote, which really isn't necessary.

Regards, CNC (talk) 12:25, 11 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Gotcha, thanks for letting me know. Appreciate your unbiased take on the situation and I'll backpedal the trout. Alexandraaaacs1989 (talk) 12:32, 11 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

December 2025 AfC backlog drive award

		Brownie
		This is awarded to CommunityNotesContributor for accumulating more than 17.5 points during the December 2025 AfC backlog drive. Your dedication and contributions to Wikipedia's content review process were crucial in reviewing over 9,000 drafts during the drive. Thank you for your participation and helping to reduce the backlog! ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 15:43, 11 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Crystal Palace Women

I see you have removed ruesha Littlejohn from the current squad. I just thought id let you know she is still with the team just shes on a ban atm due to her tackle last year. You might want to re-add her. Pendolino390119 (talk) 22:32, 12 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

My bad, have restored. CNC (talk) 22:49, 12 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

its alright. Thought it would've been a mistake Pendolino390119 (talk) 22:52, 12 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Co-authoring a policy page proposal with another user

Inviting you to help out, no pressure though—just thought this type of thing might be in your wheelhouse!

WP:SCA / WP:SERIOUSLYCONTESTED Alexandraaaacs1989 (talk) 17:40, 13 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, saw that but not really interested. You'd be better off notifying Wikipedia:Fringe theories/Noticeboard or Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard. Regards, CNC (talk) 17:52, 13 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

2wait or not 2wait

I think I'll wait before proposing an RM for WP:WHYWAIT, in order not to be WP:TROUTed. Boud (talk) 11:21, 14 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

You joke about it, but I wrote that a few days ago and spent that long trying to figure out a title. With WP:WAIT is taken, WP:Too soon to move and WP:Wait, don't move also came to mind. I still don't like the title at all is the irony. Remember that April 1 isn't too far away, that'd be a good time for people to !vote wait and the proposer not get trouted ;) CNC (talk) 11:25, 14 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Edit notice

I saw your edit summary on the article Craig Silvey about an "edit notice". How does one employ an edit notice? Thank you. _signed,Kvinnen (talk) 14:20, 14 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit summary. I had forgotten to add this to my question, here it is. Thanks! _signed,Kvinnen (talk) 14:21, 14 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

It's at the base name Template:Editnotices/Page, so for Silvey the notice is at Template:Editnotices/Page/Craig Silvey. But as you will see they can only be edited by page movers, template editors, and admins. So your best bet is to make an edit request on the talk page for someone to add it when there is a need to create one, or use the talk page when one already exists but needs an addition. There isn't a request template for editnotice space that I know of, but {{Edit template-protected}} would work (which template editors and admins will check). Regards, CNC (talk) 14:34, 14 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Theoretically, I can make a template page like the one you made for Craig Silvey? Thanks! _signed,Kvinnen (talk) 15:15, 14 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Not without the correct permissions no: Warning: This page can only be created and/or edited by administrators, template editors, and page movers because it matches an entry on the local or global title blacklist. The blacklist being Template:Editnotices space. CNC (talk) 15:20, 14 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I will stay away then. Thank you! _signed,Kvinnen (talk) 15:26, 14 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for discussion of Template:Editnotices/Page/United States v. Maduro, et al.

Template:Editnotices/Page/United States v. Maduro, et al. has been nominated for discussion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 02:22, 16 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Trump page

Hi CNC; that edit you made on Trump is supported by Onyx and that means that there are 2 of you supporting that edit; Space4Time is currently reverting which seems incorrect. As an option, it seems to you could change it back based on support from Onyx and open Talk page discussion at the Trump page where Space4Time can explain his thinking in reverting against 2-3 editors. ErnestKrause (talk) 15:00, 29 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I already spoke to Space4Time3Continuum2x and explained to them the BRD restriction, but it seems that's been ignored. It was only the miss-citing that I was reverting as a sloppy edit per the edit summary; I wasn't opposing the content itself, nor do I endorse it. As I say on my userpage I otherwise can't be bothered with an edit war, so whatever issues others have with the content, that's been restored a second time now, will have to be dealt with by other editors. Thanks anyway, CNC (talk) 15:14, 29 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for getting back on this. Since you are supporting Onyx, then I'll offer to support you if you take this to Talk page. That would make two more editors supporting your viewpoint. ErnestKrause (talk) 15:22, 29 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

To be clear, I'm not supporting another editor. CNC (talk) 15:24, 29 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]