Jump to content

Wikipedia:Categories for discussion

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
"WP:CFD" redirects here. For criteria for deletion, see WP:Criteria for deletion.
"WP:CFR" redirects here. For criteria for redaction, see WP:Criteria for redaction.
Deletion discussions
Articles
Templates
Files
Categories
Redirects
Miscellany
Speedy deletion
Proposed deletion
XFD backlog
V Jul Aug Sep Oct Total
CfD 0 0 0 38 38
TfD 0 0 0 19 19
MfD 0 0 0 1 1
FfD 0 0 1 11 12
RfD 0 0 0 31 31
AfD 0 0 0 7 7

Categories for discussion (CfD) is the central venue for discussing specific proposals to delete, merge, rename or split categories and stub types in accordance with the guidelines for categorization, category naming and stub articles.

For detailed instructions about using CfD, see "How to use CfD" below. Briefly, nominations are handled through one of two processes:

  1. Speedy renaming and merging, for uncontroversial proposals that meet specified criteria—see "Speedy renaming and merging" below.
  2. Full discussion, for all other proposals. Discussions typically remain open for at least seven days and are closed once a rough consensus has formed or no objections to the nomination are raised.

Except in uncontroversial cases such as reverting vandalism, do not amend or depopulate a category once it has been nominated at CfD as this hampers other editors' efforts to evaluate a category and participate in the discussion.

Wikipedia:Move review can be used to contest the outcome of a CfD request that is limited in scope to renaming, as long as all steps are followed. If a discussion on the request closer's talk page does not resolve an issue, then a move review will evaluate the close of a CfD move discussion to determine whether or not the close was reasonable and consistent with the spirit and intent of common practice, policies, and guidelines. CfDs involving deletion should be reviewed at Wikipedia:Deletion review.

Scope

[edit]
Shortcut

CfD is intended only for specific proposals to delete, merge, rename or split categories or stub types. For general discussion about how to improve the category system, use other appropriate venues such as Wikipedia talk:Categorization, Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Categories, and any relevant WikiProjects' talk pages.

Current discussions

[edit]

Add a new entry

Closing procedure

[edit]
Main page: Wikipedia:Deletion process § Closing discussions that have run their full time
Shortcut

After seven days, an administrator (or possibly a non-admin) will determine if consensus has formed, and close the discussion. If appropriate, the discussion instead may be relisted to allow for more discussion. Editors closing discussions must follow the administrator instructions and implement the result or log it at the Working page to ensure it is implemented. As noted at Wikipedia:Deletion process#Non-administrators closing discussions, non-admins may follow the process at Wikipedia talk:Categories for discussion/Working, and list discussion results there for an admin to review, and to log to the page directly.

Discussions awaiting closure

[edit]

How to nominate a category for discussion

[edit]
Shortcut

Nomination procedure

[edit]

Twinkle

[edit]

You may use Twinkle to facilitate CfD nominations. To install Twinkle, go to Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-gadgets and check "Twinkle" in the "Browsing" section. Use the now-installed "XfD" (Start a deletion discussion) tab while viewing the page you want to nominate.

Twinkle only allows you to nominate a single category or stub template. For bundled nominations including multiple categories, see § MassCFD.

MassCFD

[edit]

You can use the script User:Qwerfjkl/scripts/massXFD to automatically make mass nominations.

Manual nominations

[edit]
I
Preliminary steps.

Before nominating a category:

In the following special cases:

For further information, see Wikipedia:Categorization and Wikipedia:Manual of Style.

II
Edit the category.

Add one of the following templates at the beginning of the category page (not the talk page) of every category to be discussed. For nominations involving large numbers of categories, help adding these templates can be requested here.

Otherwise, if nominating a single category:
If nominating a group of related categories, use a bundled nomination:
  • For deleting, use {{subst:Cfd|CfD section name}}
  • For merging, use {{subst:Cfm|Other category|CfD section name}}
    • For merging to two categories, use {{subst:Cfm-double|Other category 1|Other category 2|CfD section name}}
  • For renaming, use {{subst:Cfr|Proposed name|CfD section name}}
  • For splitting, use {{subst:Cfs|Proposed name 1|Proposed name 2|CfD section name}}
  • For converting the category into a list, {{subst:Cfl|Proposed name|CfD section name}}
  • For other options (containerization, etc.), use {{subst:Cfd|type=nature of proposed discussion|CfD section name}} (see Template:Cfd/doc#Optional parameter)
  • Include "CfD", "CfM", "CfR", "CfS" or "CfL" in the edit summary, and do not mark the edit as minor. Preview before saving.
  • To add the template for previous nomination days, use the "full" version of the template by appending "full" to the template name, i.e. {{cfd full}}, {{cfm full}}, {{cfr full}}, {{cfs full}} and {{cfl full}}. Use the |day=, |month= and |year= parameters to make the banner link to the correct CfD page.
  • Consider adding {{subst:cfd notice|Category name|2025 October 29|CfD section name}} ~~~~ to the talk page of the category's creator.
  • For details about these templates, see each template's documentation.
III
Create the CFD section.

Click THIS LINK to edit the section of CfD for today's entries.

Follow the instructions (visible in edit mode) to copy and paste one of the templates below. When inserting category names into these template's parameters, except the text= parameter, omit the Category: prefix and do not use wikilinks, as the template takes care of this.

If nominating a single category:
  • For deleting, use {{subst:Cfd2|Obsolete category|text=Your reason(s) for the proposed deletion. ~~~~}}
  • For merging, use {{subst:Cfm2|Origin category|Destination category|text=Your reason(s) for the proposed merge. ~~~~}}
    • For merging to two categories, use {{subst:Cfm2|Origin category|Destination category 1|target2=Destination category 2|text=Your reason(s) for the proposed merge. ~~~~}}
  • For renaming, use {{subst:Cfr2|Current category|Proposed name|text=Your reason(s) for the proposed rename. ~~~~}}
  • For splitting, use {{subst:Cfs2|Current category|Proposed category 1|Proposed category 2|text=Your reason(s) for the proposed split. ~~~~}}
  • For converting the category into a list, use {{subst:Cfc2|Current category|Proposed article|text=Your reason(s) for the proposed conversion. ~~~~}}
  • For other options (containerization, etc.), use {{subst:Cfd2|Current category|type=other type|text=Your reason(s) for the proposed conversion. ~~~~}}
For a bundled nomination, use one of the standard templates to build the "Cfd section name" for the first nominated category. After saving that, the second and subsequent nominations must be inserted manually, as follows:
==== Cfd section name ====
* 1st category
* 2nd category [Make clear whether you propose deletion, merging or renaming]
* Your reason for nominating the categories, and signature.
  • If a bundled nomination is too long, consider using {{hidden}} to hide some of the nominated categories.
  • In your reason, use links if mentioning articles or categories. To link to a category, use the colon trick by adding a colon (:) to the beginning of the link, e.g. [[:Category:Foo]].
  • Preview before saving to check that your nomination is formatted correctly, and remember to include your signature at the end of the nomination.

Stub types

[edit]
I
Preliminary steps.

In general, a stub type consists of a stub template and a dedicated stub category. Before nominating a stub type for deletion, merging or renaming:

  • Read and understand guidance for creating stub types and stub type naming conventions.
  • Review the list of existing stub types—be advised, this list may not be comprehensive.
  • If you wish to:
    • Create a new stub type—follow the procedure for proposing new stub types.
    • Delete, merge or rename a stub category only, without deleting or renaming the associated stub template—follow the instructions above this section.
    • Delete or rename a stub template—continue to section II.
II
Edit the template.

Add one of the following tags at the beginning of the template to be discussed.

  • For deletion, use {{subst:Sfd-t|Section name}}
  • For renaming, use {{subst:Sfr-t|Proposed name|Section name}}
  • Please include "SFD" or "SFR" in the edit summary, and don't mark the edit as minor. Preview before saving.
  • Consider notifying the template's creator on their talk page. To find the contributor, check the page history of the stub template.
III
Create the CFD section.

Click THIS LINK to edit the section of CfD for today's entries.

Follow the instructions (visible in edit mode) and paste the following text (remember to update the default parameters):

  • For deletion, use {{subst:sfd-t2|TemplateName|text=Your reason(s) for the proposed deletion. ~~~~}}
  • For renaming, use {{subst:sfr-t2|TemplateOldName|TemplateNewName|text=Your reason(s) for the proposed deletion. ~~~~}}
  • In your rationale, mention how many articles currently use the template to help other editors. When linking to a category in your rationale, always add a colon (:) to the beginning of the link, like [[:Category:Foo]]. This makes a category link that can be seen on the page, and avoids putting this page into the category you are nominating.
  • Preview before saving to check that your nomination is formatted correctly, and remember to include your signature at the end of the nomination.

Notifying interested projects and editors

[edit]

In addition to the steps listed above, you may choose to invite participation by editors who are likely to be informed about a nominated category. All such efforts must comply with Wikipedia's guideline against biased canvassing. In addition, to help make your messages about the CfD discussion clear, avoid Wikipedia-specific abbreviations, link to relevant policies or guidelines, and link to the discussion itself.

Notifying related WikiProjects

WikiProjects consist of groups of editors who are interested in a particular subject. If a nominated category is within the scope of one or more WikiProjects, consider adding a brief, neutral note on their talk page(s) about the nomination. You may use {{subst:cfd notice|Category name|2025 October 29|CfD section name}} ~~~~ or write a personalized message.

Tagging the nominated category's talk page with a relevant WikiProject's banner will include the category in that WikiProject's Article Alerts if they subscribe to the system. For instance, tagging a nominated category with {{WikiProject Physics}} will add the discussion to Wikipedia:WikiProject Physics/Article alerts.

Notifying substantial contributors to the category

While not required, it is generally considered courteous to notify the good-faith creator and main contributors of the category that you are nominating for discussion. To find the creator and main contributors, check the category's page history or talk page. You may use {{Cfd notice}} to inform the category's creator and all other editors.

Notifying other interested editors

It may be helpful to invite other subject-matter experts by posting a message on the talk page of the most closely related article, such as Protein family for Category:Protein families. You may use {{Cfdnotice}} for this.

Speedy renaming and merging

Shortcut

Speedy renaming or speedy merging of categories may be requested only if they meet a speedy criterion, for example WP:C2D (consistency with main article's name) or WP:C2C (consistency with established category tree names). Please see instructions below.

  1. Determine which speedy criterion applies
  2. Tag category page with {{subst:cfr-speedy|New name}} or {{subst:cfm-speedy|Merge target}}
  3. List request along with speedy criteria reason under "Current requests" below on this page

Please note that a speedy request must state which of the narrowly defined criteria strictly applies. Hence, any other non-speedy criteria, even "common sense" or "obvious", may be suitable points, but only at a full discussion at WP:Categories for discussion.

Requests may take 48 hours to process after listing if there are no objections. This delay allows other users to review the request to ensure that it meets the speedy criteria for speedy renaming or merging, and to raise objections to the proposed change.

Categories that qualify for speedy deletion (per Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion, e.g., "patent nonsense", "recreation") can be tagged with the regular speedy tags, such as {{db|reason}} with no required delay. Empty categories can be deleted if they remain empty 7 days after tagging with {{db-empty}}. Renaming under C2E may also be processed instantly (at the discretion of an administrator) as it is a variation on G7.

To oppose a speedy request you must record your objection within 48 hours of the nomination. Do this by inserting immediately under the nomination:

  • Oppose, (the reasons for your objection). ~~~~

You will not be able to do this by editing the page WP:Categories for discussion. Instead, you should edit the section WP:Categories for discussion#Add requests for speedy renaming and merging here or the page WP:Categories for discussion/Speedy#Add requests for speedy renaming and merging here (WP:CFDS). Be aware that in the course of any discussion, the nomination and its discussion may get moved further down the page purely for organizational convenience – you may need to search WP:CFDS to find the new location. Participate in any ongoing discussion, but unless you withdraw your opposition, a knowledgeable person may eventually bring forward the nomination and discussion to become a regular CFD discussion. At that stage you may add further comments, but your initial opposition will still be considered. However, if after seven days there has been no support for the request, and no response from the nominator, the request may be dropped from further consideration as a speedy.

Contested speedy requests become stale, and can be untagged and delisted after 7 days of inactivity. Optionally, if the discussion may be useful for future reference, it may be copied to the category talk page, with a section heading and {{moved discussion from|[[WP:CFDS]]|2=~~~~}}. If the nominator wants to revive the process, this may be requested at WP:Categories for discussion (CfD) in accordance with its instructions.

If you belatedly notice and want to oppose a speedy move that has already been processed, contact one of the admins who process the Speedy page. If your objection seems valid, they may reverse the move, or start a full CFD discussion.

Speedy criteria

[edit]
Shortcut

The category-specific criteria for speedy renaming, or merging are strictly limited to:

C2A: Typographic and spelling fixes

[edit]
Shortcut
  • Correction of spelling errors and capitalization fixes. Differences between British and American spelling (e.g. Harbours → Harbors) are not considered errors; however if the convention of the relevant category tree is to use one form over the other then a rename may be appropriate under C2C. If both spellings exist as otherwise-identical category names, they should be merged.
  • Appropriate conversion of hyphens into en dashes or vice versa (e.g. Category:Canada-Russia relations → Category:Canada–Russia relations).
  • Correction of obvious grammatical errors, such as a missing conjunction (e.g. Individual frogs toads → Individual frogs and toads). This includes pluralizing a noun in the name of a set category, but not when disagreement might reasonably be anticipated as to whether the category is a topic or set category.

C2B: Consistency with established Wikipedia naming conventions and practices

[edit]
Shortcut

C2C: Consistency with established category tree names

[edit]
Shortcut

Bringing a category into line with established naming conventions for that category tree, or into line with the various "x by y", "x of y", or "x in y" categorization conventions specified at Wikipedia:Category names

  • This should be used only where there is no room for doubt that the category in question is being used for the standard purpose instead of being a potential subcategory.
  • This criterion should be applied only when there is no ambiguity or doubt over the existence of a category naming convention. Such a convention must be well defined and must be overwhelmingly used within the tree. If this is not the case then the category in question must be brought forward to a full CfD nomination.
  • This criterion will not apply in cases where the category tree observes distinctions in local usage (e.g. Category:Transportation in the United States and Category:Transport in the United Kingdom).

C2D: Consistency with main article's name

[edit]
Shortcut
  • Renaming a topic category to match its eponymous page (e.g. Category:The Beatles and The Beatles).
  • This applies only if the related page's current name (and by extension, the proposed name for the category) is:
    • unambiguous (so it generally does not apply to proposals to remove a disambiguator from the category name, even when the main article is the primary topic of its name, i.e. it does not contain a disambiguator); and
    • uncontroversial, either because of longstanding stability at that particular name, or because the page was just moved (i) after a page move discussion resulted in explicit consensus to rename, or (ii) unilaterally to reflect an official renaming which is verified by one or more citations (provided in the nomination). C2D does not apply if the result would be contrary to guidelines at WP:CATNAME, or there is any ongoing discussion about the name of the page or category, or there has been a recent discussion concerning any of the pages that resulted in a no consensus result, or it is controversial in some other way.
  • This criterion may also be used to rename a set category in the same circumstances, where the set is defined by a renamed topic; e.g. players for a sports team, or places in a district.
  • Before nominating a category to be renamed per WP:C2D, consider whether it makes more sense to move the article instead of the category.

C2E: Author request

[edit]
Shortcut
  • This criterion applies only if the author of a category requests or agrees to renaming within six months of creating the category.
  • The criterion does not apply if other editors have populated or changed the category since it was created. "Other editors" includes bots that populated the category, but excludes an editor working with the author on the renaming.

C2F: One eponymous page

[edit]
Shortcut
  • This criterion applies if the category contains only an eponymous article, list, template or media file, provided that the category has not otherwise been emptied shortly before the nomination. The default outcome is an upmerge to the parent categories, where applicable. Nominations should use {{subst:cfm-speedy}} (speedy merger) linking to a suitable parent category, or to another appropriate category (e.g. one that is currently on the article). When listing the nomination at WP:CFDS, you must manually add all the appropriate parent categories as targets if the member page is not already in them.

Admin instructions

[edit]

When handling the listings:

  1. Make sure that the listing meets one of the above criteria.
  2. With the exception of C2E, make sure that it was both listed and tagged at least 48 hours previously.
  3. Make sure that there is no opposition to the listing; if there is a discussion, check if the opposing user(s) ended up withdrawing their opposition.

If the listing meets these criteria, simply have the category renamed or merged – follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Administrator instructions, in the section "If the decision is to Rename, Merge, or Delete"; to list it for the bots, use the Speedy moves section.

Applying speedy criteria in full discussions

[edit]
  • A nomination to merge or rename, brought forward as a full CfD, may be speedily closed if the closing administrator is satisfied that:
    • The nomination clearly falls within the scope of one of the criteria listed here, and
    • No objections have been made within 48 hours of the initial nomination.
  • If both these conditions are satisfied, the closure will be regarded as having been a result of a speedy nomination. If any objections have been raised then the CfD nomination will remain in place for the usual 7-day discussion period, to be decided in accordance with expressed consensus.

Add requests for speedy renaming and merging here

[edit]
If the category does not match one of the criteria mentioned in C2 or you are in doubt as to whether it qualifies, do not list it here. Instead, list it in the main CfD section.

Use the following format on a new line at the beginning of the list: 

* [[:Category:old name]] to [[:Category:new name]] – Reason ~~~~

If the current name should be redirected rather than deleted, use: 

* REDIRECT [[:Category:old name]] to [[:Category:new name]] – Reason ~~~~

To note that human action is required, e.g. updating a template that populates the category, use: 

* NO BOTS [[:Category:old name]] to [[:Category:new name]] – Reason ~~~~

Remember to tag the category page with: {{subst:cfr-speedy|New name}}

A request may be completed if it is more than 48 hours old; that is, if the time stamp shown is earlier than 10:59, 27 October 2025 (UTC). Currently, there are 558 open requests (refresh).

Current requests

[edit]

Please add new requests at the top of the list, preferably with a link to the parent category (in case of C2C) or relevant article (in case of C2D).

Opposed requests

[edit]
  • Category:International sports competitions hosted in West Berlin to Category:International sports competitions in West Berlin – C2C: Incorrect either way, convention adopted (though perhaps never properly agreed upon) is 'hosted by' for countries and simply 'in' for cities. Not sure about having such a layer for West Berlin when unified Berlin currently does not (nor East Berlin) but that's for another forum... Crowsus (talk) 22:32, 24 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Strong oppose. Nominator does not know history. West Berlin was a separate international entity (and not part of West Germany). East Berlin was part of East Germany. SFBB (talk) 23:29, 24 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    @SFBB, do not remove the speedy notice from the category page until the process is completed one way or the other. The article on West Berlin suggests that it was essentially part of West Germany. Regardless of that, why does that mean the category should not be renamed to remove the word "hosted"? As Crowsus explained, no other categories use the format "hosted in". It should be "hosted by" or just "in". Mclay1 (talk) 00:03, 25 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    @Mclay1 Of course, West Berlin wasn't part of West Germany...and this was ferociously contested by East Germany and other Eastern block countries. Just read the first paragraph of West Berlin or about how close was East Germany to boycott the FIFA World Cup 1974 just to mention a well-known example. Inhabitants of West Berlin were mostly West Germans (because of ius sanguini and West Germany considering every German: be it for the Sarre, East Germany, or West Berlin to be citizens of West Germany), but in was ruled completely separately from West Germany. Mock federeations were cretead to organize international sports events in West Berlin and so to avoid a boycott by Eastern European countries, and so on.
    Regarding the remarks about the word "hosted", I have no problems (but that should not be discussed here). SFBB (talk) 00:14, 25 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    'Hosted by' would be fine for me as a starting point since SFBB is viewing WB as a national entity. There are discussions elsewhere about that concept but this is just about getting the wording right. Crowsus (talk) 00:21, 25 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    We're simply trying to standardise the naming format of the category. It's such an insignificant change that it doesn't seem to warrant a full CfD. If everyone is fine with treating West Berlin as a country, then Category:International sports competitions hosted by West Berlin is the correct format. Mclay1 (talk) 00:25, 25 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    I had chosen for "hosted in" because the situation was extremely complicated and changed over time, and it also varied depending on the sport and the level of pressure exerted by Eastern European countries. As an "umbrella" wording, I think "hosted in" is more comprehensive and accurate than "hosted by", but I would not oppose homogenization. Anyways, this is not a discussion for speedy. SFBB (talk) 18:14, 25 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    If you want it to go to a full CfD, it can, but this is definitely a discussion we can have at speedy. Mclay1 (talk) 00:26, 26 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Alternatively maybe it would be better if I cancel this nomination until the matter of how West Berlin should be treated for categorisation has been resolved elsewhere, then it will be clear which of the preferred conventions this should be tweaked to. Crowsus (talk) 23:23, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On hold pending other discussion

[edit]
  • None currently

Moved to full discussion

[edit]
  • Oppose — As was the case with the recently-moved Skagway categories, the main article clumsily conflates separate topics (a borough and a once-incorporated city turned CDP resulting from the borough's incorporation) which are and would be presented as separate articles everywhere else on the encyclopedia. Yakutat would refer to the community, which is different from the borough (borough, CDP). The lack of willingness to fix this is hardly a justification for only making the situation worse by confusing the difference across namespaces. The nominator's efforts to clean up this category tree has already resulted in a lot of arbitrary categorization as it relates to their perceived definition of various communities. RadioKAOS / Talk to me, Billy / Transmissions 03:59, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Next Step Thanks for the feedback. Normally, when a speedy is opposed, I moved it to a full CFD discussion but here it sounds like the root concern is at the article level. I just want the category to match the main article, but have no opinion on whether the latter should be renamed or split.
@RadioKAOS: Would you be interested in opening an RM and/or split proposal at Talk:Yakutat, Alaska as the next step? - RevelationDirect (talk) 21:35, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ready for deletion

[edit]

Check Category:Empty categories awaiting deletion for out of process deletions. In some cases, these will need to be nominated for discussion and the editor who emptied the category informed that they should follow the WP:CFD process.

Once the renaming has been completed, copy and paste the listing to the Ready for deletion section of Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Working/Manual.

Empty categories awaiting deletion

[edit]

The categories listed below have been identified as empty using {{db-catempty}}, and will be speedily deleted after 7 days unless populated. (Note: Due to technical limitations, all contents of the category may not be displayed; view the category directly to see all contents.)

Empty categories awaiting deletion
Songs written by Michael Kiske
Morgan State men's lacrosse Bears
Alumni of Holy Cross College, Kalutara
Martiniquan criminal law
1983 Philippine television series endings
Middle East and North Africa
Footballers from the Andaman and Nicobar Islands
Recipients of the Setia Negara Brunei, 1st
British emigrants to Qatar
Qatari people of British descent
Deadwater Drowning albums
Boxing at the 1962 British Empire and Commonwealth Games
Lists of The Wire characters
2027 comedy films
Films made in Oklahoma
July 2014 sports events in South Africa
People from Auvergne (province)
Sport in Ede, Netherlands
Organizations based in Petrozavodsk
Organisations based in Weert
Organisations based in Gorinchem
Railway stations in Denmark by decade of closing
Railway stations in Finland by decade of closing
Railway stations in Belgium by decade of closing
Railway stations in Austria by decade of closing
Railway stations in Latvia by decade of closing
Railway stations in Austria closed in the 20th century
Railway stations in Austria closed in the 21st century
Railway stations in Austria by century of closing
Railway stations in Switzerland closed in the 20th century
Railway stations in Latvia closed in the 21st century
Railway stations in Latvia by century of closing
July 2014 in South Africa
Silent Swedish short films
Sport in Hellendoorn
Organisations based in Hellendoorn
Compositions by Johan Svendsen
Toronto Tempo
Culture of Jiangsu
Fantastic Four lists
Breathing Space albums
Sreebhumi FC players
1-(Benzenesulfonyl)-3-cyclohexylureas
Information technology organisations based in Sweden
Naëla songs
Ukrainian nationalist assassins
Soldiers of the Russian Empire
Switzerland–Uganda relations
Seychelles–Switzerland relations
West Coast blues saxophonists
2026 NRL Women's season
2026 in women's rugby league
Indigenous peoples in Tlaxcala
Indigenous peoples in Guerrero
Indigenous peoples in Guanajuato
Indigenous peoples in Querétaro
Norwegian transgender men
1720 disestablishments by country
Samoa–Switzerland relations
Cook Islands–Switzerland relations
Switzerland–Tuvalu relations
2030 elections in the United States
2030s elections in the United States
2030 elections in North America
2030s elections in North America
2010s disasters in Senegal
2020s disasters in Senegal
Disasters in Senegal by decade
FC Yunist ShVSM managers
Years in association football deaths
Disasters in Senegal by year
Companies of Senegal by year of establishment
Eastern Orthodox theologians by nationality
Years of the 18th century in Prussia
Entertainers from Cumbria by populated place
Entertainers from Herefordshire by populated place
Entertainers from Worcestershire by populated place
Years of the 16th century in the Habsburg Netherlands
Years of the 17th century in the Habsburg Netherlands
Years in the Habsburg Netherlands
Metafictional films
1720 disestablishments in Europe
1720 disestablishments by continent
1720 disestablishments
Sports venues in the West Indies
Cricket grounds in the Caribbean
International club water polo competition logos
1573 in the Dutch Republic
Australian erotica writers
Andi people
Cannabinoid metabolites
Pre-Independence Schools in Kenya
The Eight Islamic Schools of Jurisprudence
Ministers of justice of the Gambia
Czechoslovak artisans
Hotels established in 2025
Ruoska songs
1574 in the Dutch Republic
1650s in Ukraine
Years of the 17th century in Ukraine
1670s establishments in Ukraine
1670s in Ukraine
Years of the 16th century in Ukraine
1580s in Ukraine
1590s establishments in Ukraine
1590s in Ukraine
1610s establishments in Ukraine
1610s in Ukraine
1680s establishments in Ukraine
1660s in Ukraine
1680s in Ukraine
User zh-sic
1578 in the Dutch Republic
Lists of characters in South Korean television animation
Lists of characters in Korean television animation
2024 Hockey India League
January 2016 in the Netherlands
MDFA Elite Division seasons
MDFA Elite Division players
MDFA Elite Division
2025 establishments in Romania
1579 in the Dutch Republic
Railway stations in the Czech Republic opened in the 1910s
Railway stations in the Czech Republic opened in the 1900s
Railway stations in the Czech Republic opened in the 1890s
Railway stations in the Czech Republic opened in the 1870s
Railway stations in the Czech Republic opened in the 1860s
Railway stations in Slovakia opened in the 2010s
Railway stations in Slovakia opened in the 1950s
Railway stations in Slovakia opened in the 1900s
Railway stations in Slovakia opened in the 1890s
Railway stations in Slovakia opened in the 1870s
Railway stations in Slovakia opened in the 1860s
Railway stations in the Czech Republic opened in the 1880s
Railway stations in the Czech Republic by year of opening
Railway stations in Slovakia by year of opening
Railway stations in the Czech Republic opened in the 1850s
Railway stations in the Czech Republic opened in the 1830s
Railway stations in the Czech Republic opened in the 1840s
Railway stations in Slovakia opened in the 1840s
1570s in the Dutch Republic
Railway stations in Slovakia by decade of opening
1890s establishments in Slovakia
1890s in Slovakia
1870s establishments in Slovakia
1870s in Slovakia
1860s establishments in Slovakia
1860s in Slovakia
19th-century Nepalese businesspeople
Track and field stadiums in the United States
Chapels in Guimarães
2030s in Washington, D.C.
Silent German crime comedy films
Silent British crime comedy films
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion&oldid=1315813636"