Jump to content

Template:Admin dashboard

Permanently protected template
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

User:Xenocidic/dashboard/users

User:Xenocidic/dashboard/users

Immediate requests Entries
Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages 0
Wikipedians looking for help 1
Requests for unblock 26
Wikipedia semi-protected edit requests 8
Wikipedia extended-confirmed-protected edit requests 10
Wikipedia template-protected edit requests 55
Wikipedia fully protected edit requests 8
Wikipedia conflict of interest edit requests 205
Requested RD1 redactions 5
Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations 0
Candidates for speedy deletion 7
Open sockpuppet investigations 89
Click here to locate other admin backlogs

Purge the cache of this page

Administrative backlog

Reports

User-reported

Candidates for speedy deletion Entries
Attack pages 0
Copyright violations 0
Hoaxes 0
Vandalism 0
User requested 0
Empty articles 0
Nonsense pages 0
Spam pages 5
LLM pages 0
Importance or significance not asserted 0
Possibly contested candidates 1
Other candidates 2
The following articles and files have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days:
Deletion backlog

Wikipedia files with unknown source – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files missing permission – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale – No backlog currently
Disputed non-free Wikipedia files – No backlog currently
Orphaned non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently
Replaceable non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently

Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – 2 items

Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 76 items

Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old needing human review – No backlog currently

Requested RD1 redactions – 5 items

Proposed deletion – No backlog currently
Usernames for administrator attention


User-reported

Requests for page protection


Current requests for increase in protection level

Request addition of protection to a page, or increasing the current protection level

Place requests for protection increases at the BOTTOM of this section. If you cannot find your request, check the archive of requests or, failing that, the page history. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.


Reason: High level of IP vandalism. The article keeps being changed by anonymous users putting in fake companies like Red Rocket Entertainment or Vissy Entertainment, Inc. Please, have this page protected. Thank you. XyloQuip289 (talk) 16:39, 25 October 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. No such edits seem to have been reverted in the last 24hours or so. If it emerges again feel free to file a new request. Steven Walling • talk 21:54, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

Temporary full protection: Slow edit warring over whether to include 3 characters or not. Tenshi! (Talk page) 17:40, 25 October 2025 (UTC)

@Tenshi Hinanawi Could you please warn the editors for edit warring? Since one of them appears to be extended-confirmed, I'd have to full-protect the page, which does not seem like a great solution at this point. Toadspike [Talk] 02:05, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
@Toadspike: Both warned, can only wait and see what happens. Tenshi! (Talk page) 02:24, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive additions to the plot summary (which should be 400 to 700 words per WP:FILMPLOT) by an Oregon-based dynamic IP. sjones23 (talk - contributions) 19:50, 25 October 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Steven Walling • talk 21:55, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:10, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – disruptive editing/vandalism. – {{u|hekatlys}} 22:48, 25 October 2025 (UTC)

  • Support Nswix (talk) 15:47, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Steven Walling • talk 21:56, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:10, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

ECP protection: Under WP:CT/SA, this article about Indian military history should be ECP protected. Orientls (talk) 22:50, 25 October 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – IP edit warring over ECP related content. (t · c) buidhe 05:35, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 140.213.176.28 (talk · contribs) blocked by Lofty abyss. For 24 hours. Daniel Case (talk) 18:46, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Per WP:CT/SA, after both recent edit-warring on infobox. Absolutiva 05:35, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent IP editor repeatedly re adding unsourced paragraph about daylight saving time to the lead section the information already exists (with sources) in the History section. Multiple reverts and warnings issued. Requesting semi protection to prevent continued disruptive editing by IPs. ThilioR O B O T🤖 talk 11:19, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – This template is visible every time an editor clicks on the "Submit an edit request" button from MediaWiki:Protectedpagetext. Editintros for template-protected pages are not as visible as other editintros and all editintros are not as visible as editnotices, so a lower protection level might suffice. Still, the same "high visibility" logic as for editnotices should apply to some degree. For comparison Template:Edit semi-protected/editintro and Template:Edit extended-protected/editintro are template-protected, Template:Edit fully-protected/editintro is semi-protected, and Template:Edit interface-protected/editintro is not protected. Protecting Template:Edit interface-protected/editintro might also be a good idea. —⁠andrybak (talk) 11:42, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

Template protected indefinitely. Both suggested pages protected. Steven Walling • talk 21:59, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:10, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Peristant IP vandalism across multiple acounts (though presumably one person) going on for moths. introduction of plausable looking but incorrect info about release info and changing review scores, etc. Cakelot1 ☞️ talk 11:46, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing. Kajmer05 (talk) 13:45, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Arbitration enforcementWP:GS/KURD. Kajmer05 (talk) 13:48, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Protect this page until 3 January 2026. 2402:8780:1022:7FD9:F13C:6852:70D2:CCC1 (talk) 14:22, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content by ip Fieryninja (talk) 14:51, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Absurd levels of edit warring. Brat Forelli🦊 15:13, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

Reason: IPs and new accounts apparently edit warring over whether this tribe was Albanian or Serbian. Sample edit summary: "I simply erased the lies of Albanian extremists. Nobody will erase our history. I’ll keep doing this every single day if I have to. I will protect my peoples history." 81.2.123.64 (talk) 15:23, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Nswix (talk) 15:43, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Nswix (talk) 15:43, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Continued disruption from IP editors following the death of Daniel Naroditsky and the expiration of the previous semi-protection. mdm.bla 15:53, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Toadspike [Talk] 20:14, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Extremely high level of IP vandalism. As the civic platform page (which was dissolved and merged into this entity) was extended-user protected I advise you to do the same with the new party. Thank you! Austragar (talk) 16:05, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Per request, arbitration enforcement action. Toadspike [Talk] 20:35, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

Temporary pending changes protection: BLP Policy Violations. IP consistently adds improperly sourced info. Equine-man (talk) 16:08, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Since IP editors were involved vs. confirmed accounts, applying semi-protection temporarily. Steven Walling • talk 22:17, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

Temporary pending changes protection: BLP Policy Violations. IP repeatedly adds improperly sourced info Equine-man (talk) 16:09, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Extended-confirm protection article related to the Israel Palestine conflict 2600:4040:2821:D500:58D4:92E2:B029:DA16 (talk) 16:39, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

  • Automated comment: This user who requested protection has been blocked from editing Wikipedia.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:09, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:CT/SA WP:GSCASTE. tony 18:35, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple recent vandalisms by multiple new users/ips. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 18:38, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Users have been creating a WP:PROMO page with no sources. Has been reverted multiple times. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 18:40, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent change of redirect target without consensus. HwyNerd Mike (tokk) 19:22, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. For edit-warring, 31 hours. @HwyNerd Mike, please file a new request if this resumes. Toadspike [Talk] 20:11, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant vandalism over the past month. MakaylaHippo1998 (talk) 20:27, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The name has been persistently changed by multiple accounts and IPs. HwyNerd Mike (tokk) 20:44, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

Reason: I created this article from main article and it needs same protection as main article Zohran Mamdani Cinaroot (talk) 21:23, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Steven Walling • talk 22:19, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:CT/CASTE. - Umby 🌕🐶 (talk) 22:02, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – anon socks, see also WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Sahilsambyal/Archive. Wikishovel (talk) 22:08, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

Current requests for reduction in protection level

Request removal of protection from a page, or reducing the current protection level

Before posting a request to this page, please discuss it with the protecting administrator first. You can create a request below only if you receive no response from them.

To find out which administrator protected the page, go to the page's edit history and click on the "View logs for this page" link (located underneath the page's title). The protecting administrator is listed in the protection log entry, next to the words "protected", "changed protection level", or "configured pending changes". If there are a large number of log entries on the page, use the drop-down menu near the top of the page and select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" to filter the logs accordingly.

DO NOT request a reduction in protection if...

  • ...you are being prevented from editing the page. A desire to change content is not a valid reason for unprotection. Instead:
    • If you can edit the article's talk page, use the WP:Edit Request Wizard to propose a change on the article's talk page. Include an explanation of the exact content that you want to change, and what the content will be afterward.
    • If the article's talk page is protected, you may propose a change at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Edit.
  • ...your reasoning for reducing protection is that the article has not been vandalized. That simply means the protection is working as intended.
  • ...your reasoning for reducing protection is basically "a long time has passed" without supporting details.
  • ...you haven't contacted the protecting administrator.

You may request a protection reduction below if...

  • ...you want to change the protection level of a template or module from full protection to template protection. You may add the request to this page without having to discuss it with the protecting administrator first.
  • ...you need to remove creation protection from a location where no page exists (redlinked pages) after a draft version of the intended article is prepared beforehand and ready to be published.
  • ...you are proposing a trial reduction in protection for a page that has been protected for several years, provided the proposal is supported by evidence such as talk page activity, page views, page traffic, number of watchers, frequency of edit requests, and prior history of vandalism.
  • ...the protecting administrator is inactive or has not responded to you in several days.

If you cannot locate your request, make sure to check the request archives to see if it's been moved there. Only requests that have been recently answered will still be listed here.

Current requests for edits to a protected page

Request a specific edit be made to a protected page
Please add an edit request to the talk page of the protected page before adding an edit request here

Edit requests should be made on the talk page of the protected article. You can create an edit request below only if the talk page is also protected, preventing you from adding a request there.

Otherwise, this is the correct place to use in order to add an edit request if you are unable to add one to the article's talk page. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to properly add a request.


Handled requests

A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.

Protected edit requests

13 protected edit requests
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
Template:Blocked text (request) 2025-09-12 16:11 Fully protected (log) Protected by MSGJ on 2022-02-25: "Highly visible template: used in interface messages"
MediaWiki:Autoblockedtext (request) 2025-09-14 19:58 MediaWiki page (log)
MediaWiki:Blockedtext (request) 2025-09-14 19:58 MediaWiki page (log) Protected by Ixfd64 on 2005-09-22: "ok test worked"
MediaWiki:Globalblocking-blockedtext-range (request) 2025-09-14 19:58 MediaWiki page (log)
Template:TFAFULL (request) 2025-09-20 14:24 Cascade-protected from Wikipedia:Cascade-protected items/Main Page/5 (log) Protected by Mifter on 2017-03-25: "Considering the main page was unprotected by a compromised sysop semi recently, perhaps transcluding it to a cascade protected page will provide a small increase in protection"
Template:Edit filter warning (request) 2025-10-14 19:31 Fully protected (log) Modified by MusikAnimal on 2019-02-25: "High-risk template or module; used in system message"
MediaWiki:Yourlanguage (request) 2025-10-25 13:00 MediaWiki page (log)
Lucifer ValentineLucifer Valentine (request) 2025-10-25 20:19 Fully protected (log) Protected by ReaderofthePack on 2015-02-09: "Repeatedly re-created"
Template:Editnotices/Namespace/Module (request) 2025-10-26 00:38 Fully protected (log) Protected by WOSlinker on 2013-10-19: "interface page"
Template:Editnotices/Namespace/Template (request) 2025-10-26 00:38 Fully protected (log) Protected by Amalthea on 2011-05-31: "interface page, transcluded in MadiaWiki space"
Template:Editnotices/Page/Template:Old moves/doc (request) 2025-10-26 00:38 Title blacklist (log) Matching line: Template:Editnotices\/.* <noedit|errmsg=titleblacklist-custom-editnotice>
Dzubukuá language (request) 2025-10-26 16:54 Fully protected, expires 2025-11-02 at 18:11:00 UTC (log) Modified by Pppery on 2025-10-26: "Special:GoToComment/c-Anachronist-20251026163400-Anachronist-20251025033700 shows this was intended to be only for one week not indef"
MediaWiki:Tb-semied (request) 2025-10-26 22:12 MediaWiki page (log)
Updated as needed. Last updated: 22:13, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
58 template-protected edit requests
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
Template:Hidden archive top (request) 2025-08-03 09:01 Template-protected (log) Modified by Mike V on 2014-08-01: "Highly visible template: per WP:RFPP request"
Template:Merge (request) 2025-08-12 19:08 Template-protected (log) Modified by Mark Arsten on 2013-10-18: "Allowing Protected Template editors"
Module:Routemap (request) 2025-08-18 07:55 Template-protected (log) Modified by Materialscientist on 2016-11-21: "Highly visible template"
Template:Article for deletion (request) 2025-08-18 15:03 Template-protected (log) Modified by Fuhghettaboutit on 2013-11-02: "Enable access by template editors"
Template:Afd2 (request) 2025-08-20 19:47 Template-protected (log) Modified by Fuhghettaboutit on 2013-11-02: "Enable access by template editors"
Template:Edit COI (request) 2025-08-21 00:54 Template-protected (log) From Template:Request edit: Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 2000+ transclusions"
Template:Nutshell (request) 2025-08-22 09:02 Template-protected (log) Modified by Mark Arsten on 2013-11-12: "Allowing Protected Template editors"
Template:Legend (request) 2025-08-23 01:36 Template-protected (log) Modified by WOSlinker on 2013-10-20: "allow template editors to modify"
Template:Collapsible lists option (request) 2025-08-23 21:20 Template-protected (log) Protected by Zzuuzz on 2018-01-13: "High risk template"
Template:Post-nominals (request) 2025-08-26 21:42 Template-protected (log) Modified by Galobtter on 2019-03-07: "Highly visible template: 30000+ transclusions; while subpages are regularly edited by non-template editors, this does not appear to need so"
Template:IPA pulmonic consonants/table (request) 2025-08-27 19:29 Template-protected (log) Protected by Ivanvector on 2020-02-13: "Highly visible template"
Template:Old XfD multi (request) 2025-08-30 10:05 Template-protected (log) From Template:Old AfD multi: Modified by Callanecc on 2014-03-27: "Highly visible template: Over 80000 transclusions, allowing template editors"
Template:Afd-merged-from (request) 2025-08-30 10:07 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 4000+ transclusions"
Template:Image frame (request) 2025-08-31 18:04 Template-protected (log) Modified by Pppery on 2025-03-09: ""
Template:Country data Andorra (request) 2025-08-31 22:28 Template-protected (log) Modified by Courcelles on 2013-10-17: "Not quite high-risk enough now that we have a trusted template editor right."
Template:Talk quote inline (request) 2025-09-02 13:34 Template-protected (log) From Template:Talk quotation: Modified by KrakatoaKatie on 2016-06-02: "Highly visible template"
Template:Infobox automobile (request) 2025-09-02 22:17 Template-protected (log) Modified by Plastikspork on 2015-12-27: "Highly visible template"
Template:WikiProject cleanup listing (request) 2025-09-03 23:31 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 4000+ transclusions"
Template:Search box (request) 2025-09-04 00:25 Template-protected (log) Protected by Callanecc on 2014-02-05: "Highly visible template"
Template:Always substitute (request) 2025-09-06 14:12 Template-protected (log) From Template:Subst only: Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 2000+ transclusions"
Template:Infobox baseball biography (request) 2025-09-07 01:00 Template-protected (log) Modified by Courcelles on 2015-09-21: "Highly visible template"
Template:Strongbad (request) 2025-09-08 08:53 Template-protected (log) Modified by Edokter on 2014-05-04: ""
Module:College color (request) 2025-09-08 17:04 Template-protected (log) Protected by The Earwig on 2015-12-14: "High-risk Lua module: over 55,000 mainspace transclusions"
User:AmandaNP/UAA/Whitelist (request) 2025-09-10 17:06 Template-protected (log) Modified by AmandaNP on 2020-07-24: "Try Template editor per main blacklist page"
Template:Infobox animanga/Video (request) 2025-09-11 17:17 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 2000+ transclusions"
Template:Infobox dam (request) 2025-09-12 12:47 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2020-08-29: "High-risk template"
Template:Tree list/styles.css (request) 2025-09-14 00:34 Template-protected (log) Protected by Ymblanter on 2018-07-26: "Highly visible template: RFPP request"
Template:Infobox religious building (request) 2025-09-15 13:02 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 4000+ transclusions"
Template:Infobox company/styles.css (request) 2025-09-19 07:17 Template-protected (log) Protected by Izno on 2024-08-25: "Highly visible template, match parent"
Module:Archive list (request) 2025-09-19 09:34 Template-protected (log) Modified by Mr. Stradivarius on 2013-11-15: "High-risk Lua module: allow template editors"
Template:AfC submission/draft (request) 2025-09-19 18:42 Template-protected (log) From Template:AFC submission/draft: Modified by Mark Arsten on 2013-10-17: "Allowing Protected Template editors"
Module:College color/data (request) 2025-09-22 05:18 Template-protected (log) Modified by Galobtter on 2019-01-24: "High-risk Lua module"
Template:Country showdata (request) 2025-09-25 18:30 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 4000+ transclusions"
Template:Format linkr (request) 2025-10-02 16:28 Template-protected (log) Modified by Pppery on 2025-08-13: ""
Template:Tracked (request) 2025-10-02 21:38 Template-protected (log) Modified by Mr. Stradivarius on 2014-10-02: "Highly visible template: allow template editors"
Template:SPI case status/core (request) 2025-10-06 20:17 Template-protected (log) Modified by LFaraone on 2014-01-13: "Highly visible template"
Template:SPIstatusentry (request) 2025-10-06 20:17 Template-protected (log) Modified by Mr. Stradivarius on 2014-11-05: "Highly visible template: allow template editors"
Template:SPIstatusheader/styles.css (request) 2025-10-06 20:17 Template-protected (log) Modified by Pppery on 2025-04-12: "Template:SPI case status also uses this and is template-protected"
Module:Section link (request) 2025-10-07 21:49 Template-protected (log) Protected by Mr. Stradivarius on 2014-12-09: "High-risk Lua module"
Template:Merge done (request) 2025-10-11 08:21 Template-protected (log) Protected by Fish and karate on 2017-11-13: "Highly visible template"
Template:Infobox ancient site (request) 2025-10-13 09:59 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 2000+ transclusions"
Template:Infobox (request) 2025-10-14 19:52 Template-protected (log) Modified by Andrew Gray on 2017-02-15: "Degrade to template permission per request, in line with WP:PP"
Template:Album chart (request) 2025-10-18 02:45 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 4000+ transclusions"
Template:Param value (request) 2025-10-20 09:19 Template-protected (log) Protected by MusikBot II on 2023-07-29: "High-risk template or module: 134494 transclusions (more info)"
Template:Requested move/dated (request) 2025-10-21 07:44 Template-protected (log) Modified by Oshwah on 2019-03-11: "Highly visible template"
Template:Period start (request) 2025-10-21 07:56 Template-protected (log) Modified by Mr. Stradivarius on 2014-06-11: "Highly visible template: allow template editors"
Template:Canadian party colour (request) 2025-10-23 01:17 Template-protected (log) Modified by MSGJ on 2018-03-24: "reinstate template protection"
Module:Infobox gene (request) 2025-10-24 07:27 Template-protected (log) Modified by GorillaWarfare on 2018-05-12: "Highly visible template"
Template:Party name with color (request) 2025-10-24 15:29 Template-protected (log) Modified by Pppery on 2025-08-13: ""
Template:Maintenance category (request) 2025-10-24 15:33 Template-protected (log) From Template:Wikipedia category: Modified by Mark Arsten on 2013-11-11: "Highly visible template"
Module:IPA/data (request) 2025-10-24 19:36 Template-protected (log) Protected by Favonian on 2023-09-16: "High-risk template or module: requested at WP:RFPP"
Template:EmdashTemplate:Emdash (request) 2025-10-25 03:06 Template-protected (log) Modified by Edokter on 2015-06-21: "Match target template"
Template:Infobox legislative election (request) 2025-10-25 19:54 Template-protected (log) Protected by Number 57 on 2020-04-13: "High use template, recent additions messing things up"
Template:User sandbox (request) 2025-10-26 00:29 Template-protected (log) Modified by Mike V on 2014-02-17: "enabling template protection"
Template:Single chart (request) 2025-10-26 03:21 Template-protected (log) Protected by Ymblanter on 2016-05-15: "Highly visible template: RFPP request"
Template:Infobox racing driver (request) 2025-10-26 17:44 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 2000+ transclusions"
Template:Polparty (request) 2025-10-26 18:22 Template-protected (log) Modified by WOSlinker on 2013-10-20: "allow template editors to modify"
Template:WikiProject Brazil (request) 2025-10-26 20:04 Template-protected (log) Modified by WOSlinker on 2013-10-17: "allow template editors to modify"
Updated as needed. Last updated: 20:20, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

WP:RFA

RfA candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report
Rjjiii 89 0 1 100 18:50, 1 November 2025 5 days, 20 hoursyes report
RfB candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report

Last updated by cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online at 22:08, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

WP:PERM

Requests for autopatrolled

Autopatrolled

Permission was revoked at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&logid=169754554 . The permission was revoked four months ago before I recently returned after 14 years of absence from the project, please reinstate. Sswonk (talk) 15:03, 9 September 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had this permission revoked in the past 180 days ([1]). MusikBot talk 15:10, 9 September 2025 (UTC)
This RfC recently established that autopatrolled can be procedurally revoked from inactive contributors, but I don't think there was consensus that it could be procedurally reinstated upon request, so I would encourage the reviewing administrator (I'm not one) to consider this like any other request. @Sswonk: I had a couple of questions about the articles you recently created: what makes this website (on Loretta Lynn: Coal Miner's Daughter) and this website (on Honky Tonk Girl: My Life in Lyrics) reliable sources? Also, since IMDb is an unreliable source, is there another citation that could be used for the award on that first article? TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 16:10, 9 September 2025 (UTC)
Also, I forgot to say: welcome back to the project! I realized my comments above could come across as trying to shoot you down after your wikibreak, but I did mean it as genuine questions/feedback. :) TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 16:20, 9 September 2025 (UTC)
Thanks TS69, I did not realize that you had posted here before I went to your talk, I am copy-pasting that here so we can continue the conversation in one place. Below is re: Jeff Burger, will respond on other questions momentarily.
I added a second citation to the first paragraph of Loretta Lynn: Coal Miner's Daughter. I think the first citation is fine, yes it is a self-published source by Jeff Burger however Burger is well-known (https://www.chicagoreviewpress.com/burger--jeff-contributor-301827.php) and the site serves as an archive of his previously published reviews. The page I cite is a reprint of a review first published in 1976, the publication is not specified, however the information about Burger suggests it satisfies "Self-published sources may be considered reliable when produced by an established subject-matter expert, whose work in the relevant field has previously been published by reliable, independent publications." See also https://search.worldcat.org/search?q=au=%22Burger%2C%20Jeff%22 -- Burger should be considered reliable. Sswonk (talk) 16:34, 9 September 2025 (UTC)
Regarding the second question about Chapter 16, please see https://chapter16.org/about-us/ and https://www.humanitiestennessee.org/about/our-story/?cn-reloaded=1 publisher of the cited, archived website. I would also consider that as satisfying WP:V.
I did not realize IMDb was unreliable, I used that because it is the single source of the page 38th Golden Globe Awards. I added the actual Golden Globes as a source. Sswonk (talk) 17:01, 9 September 2025 (UTC)
Thanks for making those changes — your point about Burger makes sense to me, so I'll remove the {{sps?}} tag, and citing the Golden Globes' website for that award looks appropriate. I'm less sure about the reliability of Chapter 16, but I think I'll leave this for an administrator to weigh whether or not that would be a significant blocker to granting the permission. TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 17:24, 9 September 2025 (UTC)
I appreciate that, thank you. Sswonk (talk) 18:20, 9 September 2025 (UTC)
The question remaining from TechnoSquirrel69 asks for administrator input on the reliability of the Chapter 16 web outlet of the Tennessee Humanities organization. Links are provided a couple of paragraphs above. I am noting here that this morning I changed the previously existing citation link on the Honky Tonk Girl: My Life in Lyrics page to a direct link rather than to the archived page, as I was able to find the current url for the review. The link TechnoSquirrel69 includes above in his initial post has been updated to a current page. So we are dealing with the WP:RS status of a current page on a site that supports a 51-year old Tennessee institution funded by the National Endowment for the Humanities. I think Chapter 16 is entirely reliable and should be used on Wikipedia articles related to Tennessee culture and history as needed. However, I want to thank TechnoSquirrel69 for diligence in finding areas for improvement in these stubs. Like him, I strive for the best references available and had determined the Chapter 16 and Jeff Burger sites were satisfactory prior to opening this request for permission; however I have been away for over a decade and am prepared to face challenges with humility. Fifteen years ago I worked on Led Zeppelin which was at the time poorly organized but since I left has been promoted to GA status. My opinion is that Loretta Lynn is on a similar level as a significant performer and figure in popular music history, and naturally I want articles about her and her work to have

top-shelf reviews; even stubs should strive for high quality, especially references within them, to help other editors find further material, to set a tone of sincerity and professionalism. Thank you again TechnoSquirrel69. Sswonk (talk) 14:17, 10 September 2025 (UTC)

What makes the Treaty of Southampton notable? voorts (talk/contributions) 21:56, 28 September 2025 (UTC)
@Sswonk voorts (talk/contributions) 22:19, 28 September 2025 (UTC)
@Voorts -- The notability rises from its mention in reliable sources as the first alliance between England and the Dutch Republic and as an initial policy forming act of Charles I. There was an existing maritime agreement, but the treaty went further and allied the two nations against Spain during a volatile period. To quote Anton Poot whose PhD thesis is one of the sources, "the maritime agreement had not mentioned Spain by name as the common enemy; the Treaty of Southampton left no doubt. It created an Anglo-Dutch partnership for a joint war against Spain, effectively meaning that England joined the Dutch in a war they had been waging already for decades." Charles was asserting England against Spain formally. The sources find it significant in the history of the Eighty Years War and of pre-civil war England. Sswonk (talk) 13:34, 29 September 2025 (UTC)
It seems like your ping didn't go through @Sswonk. Are there any sources other than the PhD dissertation that discuss the treaty in depth? voorts (talk/contributions) 01:11, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
@Voorts yes, odd about the ping. Well, as you can see in the article I posted about a month ago, I was able to identify the three sources plus the "further reading" thesis as verification for the information in the article at the time I posted it. I did not find much more, at least not that well sourced. The timing, the fact that the king did not stick by the Dutch, may make Southampton more obscure, and conceivably it might be well-challenged as not WP:RSed enough, but why? What I posted might be merged with an article that treated (pun?) the entirety of pre-civil war relations, something like that "further reading", don't know. I mean, I simply decided to write that stub article because it (the subject) is an entity that exists in history, that was mentioned in timelines, had a "redlink" where I first saw the treaty mentioned in Wikipedia, and that has sourced material about it. The entire treaty, albeit in French, is available to follow leads from. So I think it is worth posting a brief article about. This project is really a good jumping off point for people to explore and edit articles about obscure history topics. What is your opinion, Voorts, isn't what is sourced and the quality of those sources sufficient? And, shouldn't the topic be part of the encyclopedia? I have less than 8K edits in over four years of active editing, maybe I am missing something; I fell as though Treaty of Southampton fills a gap in coverage, without relying on original research. I understand WP:OWN and basically, whether obvious or not, I stepped away from editing the article the day I started it, hoping others might follow up, it isn't anything I claim to know a lot about other than those sources. But someone, or a few someones, might be able to expand the article to have more sources in a way I can't grasp this morning, and I hope that they do. Sswonk (talk) 13:52, 19 October 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I am requesting Autopatrolled rights in order to reduce the backlog of articles awaiting review. I primarily create new articles on politics and law with a focus on biographies of notable individuals. I ensure that the content I add are verifiable and the articles comply with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. My previous request was declined in March 2025. Since then, I have strived to improve the quality of my contributions and have made substantial improvements to several existing ones, upgrading them to B-grade, e.g., [2], [3] and [4]. Regards. QEnigma  03:46, 1 October 2025 (UTC)

Hello! I formally request the autopatrolled user right. I'm a regular user of Wikipedia, both in English and Spanish, and I consider that, after so many years and hundreds of articles created on both wikis, i am in the position to say that I know the rules and styles. I've never cared much about user rights, but now that I've started a personal project (ambassadors of Spain and all its lists) to expand diplomatic information about my country, Spain, I'd like to avoid the workload that comes with reviewing articles that comply with our rules. Thank you. TheRichic (Messages here) 11:12, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

@TheRichic: why is Francisco Javier Conde de Saro notable? voorts (talk/contributions) 01:20, 19 October 2025 (UTC)

Hello! I formally request the Autopatrolled user right. I'm a regular user of Wikipedia, both in Turkish and English. I have contributed to the Turkish Wikipedia, particularly on the Tao-Klarjeti region. I have also started to transfer these contributions to the English Wikipedia. I think it would be good to reduce the workload involved in reviewing the items I have written. Thank you. --ႧႤႧႰႨ ႾႠႰႨ (talk) 15:32, 15 October 2025 (UTC)

I have been editing Wikipedia since 2006, have created numerous new articles, edited countless others, and am very familiar with its policies. Λeternus (talk) 12:46, 20 October 2025 (UTC)

User regularly creates articles relating to military history, biographies, and the US. User has created over 200 articles. SnowyRiver28 (talk) 05:57, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment) +1 agree and articles created are generally good in terms of standards. Agent 007 (talk) 18:25, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
I've periodically patrolled Michelangelo1992's articles, and consistently found them to be in good shape. Focused on books as a topic area and very clear familiarity with WP:NBOOK. He's created 135 articles. ~ L 🌸 (talk) 22:56, 21 October 2025 (UTC)
Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access

AutoWikiBrowser

I'd like to effectively change articles without taking a lot of time to manually edit them one-by-one, especially for edits that are excessively repetitive--the same information copied and pasted over and over again. Information may not be changed quickly or left unchanged at all in some rare cases. Bugnawfang 02:41, 17 October 2025 (UTC)

I'm requesting AWB rights mostly for common errors (hyphen-endash-emdash) in grammar and spelling, especially in weather/tropical cyclone articles. Additionally, those articles have common errors or widespread practices that have since changed, such as the color RfC, and lots of pages have not been updated to reflect those changes. HurricaneZeta (T) (C) 00:34, 22 October 2025 (UTC)

 Done * Pppery * it has begun... 19:09, 25 October 2025 (UTC)

I plan to use AWB rights for performing small changes en masse, such as categorizing redirects and changing wikilinks. I am bad at usernames (talk | contribs) 01:20, 22 October 2025 (UTC)

 Done * Pppery * it has begun... 19:10, 25 October 2025 (UTC)

I have been manually working on subcategorization and working on adding proper categories to articles about species, one aspect of my editing involves placing {{[[Genus]]-stub}} into multiple articles, which requires a lot of manual labour. I found out about this tool and would like to have it to facilitate my editing. Zalaraz (talk) 02:43, 22 October 2025 (UTC)

 Done * Pppery * it has begun... 19:10, 25 October 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I request AutoWikiBrowser rights to generally help apply consistent templates and make efficient edits across many pages. I saw it on WP:JWB.

Thank you. Bagwe Neza (talk) 09:27, 22 October 2025 (UTC)

Hi, I'd like to use it to add lang templates throughout an article where it would be otherwise too tedious to do so (example) (in particular on articles with Chinese text, though I also intend to use it for other languages). I was recommended AWB by this teahouse question I asked when I was newer. If any less powerful tools can do the same thing, I'd be happy to use it instead. Just a generic username (talk) 10:12, 22 October 2025 (UTC)

Acct access to AWB expired (made 13k prior edits with AWB). Requesting AWB access to resume use. UW Dawgs (talk) 15:55, 23 October 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had their access to AutoWikiBrowser automatically revoked ([5]). MusikBot talk 16:00, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
 Done * Pppery * it has begun... 19:11, 25 October 2025 (UTC)

Reason for requesting autowikibrowser rights: I plan to update link text from "We Are Peru" to "Somos Perú" on about 50 pages following a page move, per Talk:We_Are_Peru#own_name. Cornellier (talk) 02:52, 24 October 2025 (UTC)

 Already done (automated response): This user already has AutoWikiBrowser access. MusikBot talk 03:00, 24 October 2025 (UTC)

I'm planning to work to improve geo-stubs that need similar information added/updated (e.g. updating populations of villages after a new census and adding geo-coordinate data) Giuliotf (talk) 14:37, 25 October 2025 (UTC)

 Done * Pppery * it has begun... 19:11, 25 October 2025 (UTC)

I would like to request access to this tool as I find myself making alot of category edits, particularly with cleaning up and creating new categories. For example, I have a manually compiled list of over 20 articles to go in a new category Music videos featuring mermaids and I'd like this tool so I can more easily do that work. WinstonDewey (talk) 17:40, 25 October 2025 (UTC)

 Done * Pppery * it has begun... 19:12, 25 October 2025 (UTC)

There are many location-related pages that, as a pattern, refer to a dead GNIS url as a citation. See Julia, West Virginia as an example. I plan to fix these refs, like at Special:Diff/1318492490. I also plan to use AWB rights in other places I've wished I had them, such as in categorizing redirects (e.g. Special:Diff/1316915448), instead of making 50+ manual edits. Staraction (talk | contribs) 21:01, 25 October 2025 (UTC)

Much of my current work involves fixing CS1 errors located via tracking categories. My latest focus is on removing or replacing deprecated parameters inside an infobox (currently over 59,000 entries). Being able to use AutoWikiBrowser in this task (and other similar ones) will save time and boost my output. I will continue to exercise care as usual. Alexanderino (talk) 05:25, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
Requests for confirmation

Confirmed

Reason for requesting confirmed rights I would like to make wikipedia pages for underground rappers. YVLVAMPIRE (talk) 00:14, 24 October 2025 (UTC)

 Not done You can create a draft article by following the guidance at WP:YFA already. I'd recommend reading up on our notability requirements though for what we expect from an article - if these rappers are underground, then it seems likely they won't yet be notable enough for an article. stwalkerster (talk) 17:31, 24 October 2025 (UTC)

Hi! I am the user behind the account Zulresso. I forgot my password and didn’t add an email so i am using a new account from now on. You can verify my identity using a check user as i am still using the same device. I need to be confirmed so i can put the notice on the old account. Thanks! Spravato (talk) 10:28, 25 October 2025 (UTC)

This is a legitimate alternate account used by Dot.py for security reasons. dot.py (alt) 02:24, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

This is my main account. dot.py 02:26, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
You only need to make six edits to be autoconfirmed. I know this isn't in the box above but frankly I am hesitant to grant confirmed to an alternate account of a user with <100 edits. Giraffer (talk) 11:49, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
Requests for extended confirmation

Extended confirmed

Translate Greek articles to English StavrosKwn (talk) 16:04, 24 October 2025 (UTC) I would like to request the extended permission in order to translate Greek articles - mostly about the railway in Greece but other topics also - in English language. I would like to note that the account I am writing this request doesn't have all of my edits as i had 3 older accounts that i lost all access resulting into having an account that looks relatively new. i would also like to note that i am a qualified english speaker by a C2 level degree

I'd like to request extended-confirmed permissions for my alt account, User:Primatedecimatingtypewriters, for when I cannot access this account, or when I need to access a public computer, and wouldn't like to put this account at risk. monkeysmashingkeyboards (talk) 17:57, 24 October 2025 (UTC)

 Done Salvio giuliano 18:40, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
Requests for event coordinator

Event coordinator

Reason for requesting event coordinator rights: for an Edit-A-Thon [1] on November 13, 2025

Nortix08 (talk) 13:26, 22 October 2025 (UTC) Nortix08 (talk) 13:26, 22 October 2025 (UTC)

Hello Nortix08. Will you be working on English or German Wikipedia for this event? Getting event coordinator on English Wikipedia doesn't help you too much if it's on German Wikipedia. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 16:00, 22 October 2025 (UTC)
My bad, sorry. Please disregard my request. 185.92.76.69 (talk) 04:53, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
My bad, sorry. Please disregard my request. Nortix08 (talk) 04:54, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
 Request withdrawn —Femke 🐦 (talk) 06:54, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
Requests for new page reviewer

New page reviewer

Hi, I was looking at the new pages feed, and I was wondering if I could try to help clear some articles off the backlog? I don't really think I'll be available to do it everyday, on a regular basis, but when I do decide to take action, I want to at least gain some experience from this. I'll also be aware to give the newer articles at least a few days before looking into them, and focus more on the older pages that have been hanging around a while. I think that's all I can say. — Alex26337 (talk) 10:38, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

 Not done: not seeing much experience in any of the three areas listed at WP:NPPCRITERIA (the deletion process, articles for creation, and new article creation). I see you've participated in a handful of AfDs, so you might want to spend some more time there and/or give AfC reviewing a try. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 22:22, 23 October 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I have noticed the large backlog and would like to help with this. I have read the requirements and believe I meet them. Chorchapu (talk | edits) 18:39, 22 October 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia and your interest in this permission. Unfortunately, between the low AfD match rate and the questionable nature of the Good offices redirect, I don't think you've quite demonstrated sufficient fluency in the relevant policies and guidelines for new page review.  Not done for now, please consider reapplying once you have a stronger track record at AfD and/or in article creation. All that having been said, I do want to compliment your excellent work at Dorfromantik (board game), where you almost single-handedly wrote a GA and thus encourage you to keep up the good work in general on Wikipedia. signed, Rosguill talk 16:31, 24 October 2025 (UTC)

I had not realised there was such a big backlog at NPP and would like to help reduce it; I am an experienced editor and article creator myself, and would be very happy to do more to help new editors learn about Wikipedia. I am interested in helping to eliminate the backlog, particularly for articles involving Indian articles sources—languages I am familiar with—that often remain stuck for long periods due to language barriers Singhchen (talk) 06:25, 24 October 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions and your interest in this permission. Unfortunately, I'm not seeing much experience in article creation or AfD that would indicate a sufficient knowledge of relevant policies and guidelines for new page review. I also find it concerning that you created Imtiaz Developments on Oct 10, which was nominated for AfD on the same day, which you then neglected to participate in, but then you immediately file a request for undeletion after the AfD is closed as soft delete. Why didn't you just participate in the discussion? Which sources do you believe establish the subject's notability?  Not done. signed, Rosguill talk 16:43, 24 October 2025 (UTC)

I'm not hunting for the New Page Reviewer right, but I'm confident that if or when I have it, I'll make a real difference in helping reduce the huge New Pages backlog... I’m a fast learner and actively participate in multiple (multitask) areas of maintenance work. Most of my contributions focus on anti-vandalism, using AutoWikiBrowser (AWB) for cleanup, adding or removing maintenance tags, copyediting, correcting categories & fixing bare URLs.

I have also participated in Good Article reviews, WP:AfD discussions and the New Pages Feed. Am familiar with our core content policies especially verifiability WP:V, No Original Research WP:NOR, Neutral Point of View WP:NPOV, reliable sourcing WP:RS, Biographies of Living Persons WP:BLP, notability WP:N and What Wikipedia Is Not WP:NOT and am confident applying them when reviewing pages.

My goal as a New Page Reviewer is to help reduce the backlog while ensuring that new articles meet Wikipedia's standards for quality and notability and also to support good-faith new editors along the way. Thank you in advance. ThilioR O B O T🤖 talk 06:05, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

I realize I am not the most experienced editor, I have however been observing the process and reading up a lot of the associated policies for a long time now and would like to get involved myself. I am currently in NPP School, but would nevertheless like to start getting some experience with some light weight cases (redirects, DAB pages, clear cut cases) and perhaps some lightweight AFC reviewing, before I graduate. I have also created a few articles and would appreciate getting the chance. Kind Regards Squawk7700 (talk) 12:41, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

I would like to renew my expired one month trial run. I still believe I have a good understanding of Wikipedia's guidelines and a good record. SpragueThomsontalk 17:50, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
Requests for page mover

Page mover

Mostly interested in just the occasional round robin swap which I have now had the opportunity to perform but cannot without this perm. Approx. 83,000 edits. New page patroller, rollbacker, and 1,200+ AfDs and other trust measures that can be looked at. Thanks. Iljhgtn (talk) 22:08, 22 October 2025 (UTC)

You can request swaps at WP:RM/TR. When requesting this permission for bold swaps, which almost all users cannot revert on their own, you should have a history of requesting correct and non-controversial moves at RM/TR. Since your last request for this permission was declined the only request you have made there was seeking a category move (after having been told in the declined permission request that those have to go through WP:CFD). So  Not done. I'd suggest requesting this permission again when your 5 most recent RM/TR requests have been accepted. ~ Jenson (SilverLocust 💬) 02:52, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
Requests for pending changes reviewer

Pending changes reviewer

I'd like reviewer rights so I can help with pending changes and speed up the review process. Inu06 (talk) 07:19, 6 October 2025 (UTC)

I have been reverting spam and vandalism on Special:RecentChanges, and I'd like pending changes reviewer to review pending edits as they show up there. Yerlo (talk) 14:53, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

I've been editing Wikipedia for about 7 months now, and made just under 500 edits. While sometimes I make mistakes, I learn from them and try to be as understanding as possible. I've merged one article, and recently split several. I think this permission would help me improve Wikipedia,and help take some pressure of other reviewers. Tactical Falcon (talk) 22:58, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

I already make a habit of keeping an eye on Special:PendingChanges when I'm spending time on Wikipedia, and it would be great to be able to accept edits that meet the requirements rather than just reverting those that don't, especially when the backlog fills up with acceptable edits waiting for a reviewer. If I could do with any constructive criticism, please let me know. Seercat3160 (talk) 10:09, 19 October 2025 (UTC)

Reason for requesting pending changes reviewer rights I have been on here for six months now, and recently also joined the simple Wikipedia. Have had 2 declined rollback requests in July and August but have since then, I now officially fully understand the basics of Wikipedia and how to edit, only issue I have had with my editing lately was an accidental page blanking I did due to page-move vandalism and failed move-back about a month ago, but have 2000 additional edits since then (4,100 total). I recently came across one article I was editing (Seth Curry) where the issue of not being a PC-reviewer took full effect, so I am requesting to be a PC reviewer, especially as some "Likely Have Problems" pending edits I have seen in the recent changes have actually been good. MakaylaHippo1998 (talk) 04:20, 23 October 2025 (UTC)

I have made over 500 edits and currently hold the extended confirmed user status. I would like to help reduce the backlog by reviewing pending changes. Thank you. BrownCanary61 (talk) 20:07, 23 October 2025 (UTC)

I have patrolled hundreds of edits for vandalism via recent changes, I am well-versed in what is vandalism and what isn't (among other reasons to deny a pending change). And would like to help with pending changes reviewing. CocaPopsRather 19:09, 24 October 2025 (UTC)

wikignome ready to do a little bit more Jaufrec (talk) 02:04, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
Requests for rollback

Rollback

I have been actively engaged in counter-vandalism and recent changes patrol on the English Wikipedia for a considerable period. I frequently use tools such as SWViewer and Twinkle to revert vandalism. Rollback rights would allow me to perform this work more efficiently. Fardin🛸 17:48, 23 October 2025 (UTC)

I have been reverting vandalism for quite a while now, and since I don't have rollback, I use Twinkle to both revert and warn users. The ability to use WP:ANVDL and WP:HG will sure help. As of now, I am both extended confirmed and have the pending changes reviewer right. (I know it says I'm requesting PCR, but my PCR request didn't get archived.) The experience I have, especially with pesky vandals and sockpuppets like User:Office editorial, is decent.

As of the time I post this edit (including this edit), I have made 1,469 edits, have 634 mainspace edits, have 320 user talk edits, and have significantly expanded and created 3 articles. HwyNerd Mike (tokk) 05:09, 24 October 2025 (UTC)

The reason I am requesting Rollback permissions is because it would make me much more efficient Vandalism reverter. I am a fairly active counter-vandalism editor who uses features in both Twinkle and RedWarn. I also perform fairly frequent copy editing and MOS enforcement, demonstrating understanding of Wikipedia and its policies. I feel I know the difference between good and bad faith, but that isn't for me to decide. I will also use the permission to perform my actions under Wikipedia:AntiVandal. I fully understand the weight of the Rollback permission, and I will therefore use it only for reverting vandalism or other legitimate purposes, and never for content disputes.

Edit: I feel the need to point out I was recently granted access to Wikipedia:The Wikipedia Library, which confirms that I am in good standing Ullint0 (talk) 01:07, 25 October 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has 170 edits in the mainspace. MusikBot talk 08:10, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
(Non-administrator comment) Comment: I thought most extended confirmed editors have access to the library... HwyNerd Mike (tokk) 03:11, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
@HwyNerd Mike (Non-administrator comment) It just means that you have extended confirmed and your account is over 6 months old. ScrabbleTiles (talk) 06:47, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
(Non-administrator comment) Yep, I knew. 500 global edits and 6+ months old. HwyNerd Mike (tokk) 06:50, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
 Not done. You have <200 mainspace edits and <50 reverts/undos -- we are generally looking for more experience. TWL access is granted by default to anyone over a certain threshold; it does not indicate good or bad standing. Giraffer (talk) 11:52, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

Reason for requesting rollback rights SirJustinfranklin (talk) 01:39, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

I’ve been patrolling the recent changes to revert vandalism. I’ve been using Twinkle.

 Not done -- you have ~30 reverts/undos. We are generally looking for a longer track record than that. Giraffer (talk) 11:54, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
There are no outstanding requests for template editor.

Template editor

Requests for temporary account IP viewer

Temporary account IP viewer

I believe the ability to view temporary accounts IP Address's will be beneficial for efficiently dealing with subtle vandalism, to link accounts. I have read and understand the rules and privacy guidelines and agree to follow them. I have read WP:TAIV and MediaWiki's policy and agree to not use this permission for anything other than preventing vandalism. CocaPopsRather 12:28, 24 October 2025 (UTC)

 Done Sohom (talk) 14:57, 24 October 2025 (UTC)

I don't do a lot of anti vandalism work but I do chip in at NPP occasionally, and more importantly keep an eye out for some persistently abusive IP's that have disrupted articles on my watchlist. I'm concerned that the IP masking would make it harder to identify these users. I read and agree to abide with the foundation policy. (t · c) buidhe 14:56, 24 October 2025 (UTC)

 Done Sohom (talk) 14:57, 24 October 2025 (UTC)

I am very involved in counter vandalism and once the changes come into affect, this permission would allow me to remain effective. I have read and agree to the conditions associated with this permission.Equine-man (talk) 20:21, 24 October 2025 (UTC)

 Done. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 02:14, 25 October 2025 (UTC)

I believe this permission would be helpful as a new page reviewer considering my reviews often result in SPI reports and having access to IPs may help me file more informative reports. I have read the Foundation policy and agree to follow it. Thank you! Dclemens1971 (talk) 02:29, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

 Done. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 02:42, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
    1. ^ de:Wikipedia:Hannover/Termine/2025-11-13