Template:Admin dashboard
Administrative backlog
Reports
- Ilikereadinespeciallyenglishbooks (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1376 (Unusual edit count activity, details). Note: This filter has some false positives. Use caution before taking any actions. Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 04:57, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
- 203.168.243.162 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 3 five times in the last 5 minutes (New user blanking articles, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 05:07, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
User-reported
- 82.11.134.172 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On The Mark (novel) (diff): vandalism after final warning. 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco (talk) 05:07, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
- Bpdestroyeshumanity (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "destroy" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 13:50, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
- SchoolHelper1234 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- AgentSpin (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Is back 23 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Imnotkiaan.co (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "Top level domain" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 20:50, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Note on file Please check whether this name is promoting a Web site. Names may coincidentally resemble URLs or point to parked domains so take care. -- DQB (owner / report) 20:50, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
- TheMichaelJacksonOfAnimation (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- LaibDjamelofficial (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Cliffpoostinkerson (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 03:10, 16 September 2025 (UTC)- This username matched "stink(|s|ing|er|y)" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 03:10, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
- Note on file the word "stinky" is not of itself sufficiently offensive to be blockable -- DQB (owner / report) 03:10, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
User-reported
Current requests for increase in protection level
Place requests for protection increases at the BOTTOM of this section. If you cannot find your request, check the archive of requests or, failing that, the page history. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Reason: An IP user keeps removing sourced information about the subject being banned from his sport due to match fixing. Alvaldi (talk) 12:37, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
User blocked. Partial-blocked that user for a long spell. OhNoitsJamie Talk 14:30, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism came right back, except for one regular on this page everything since reduction in protection has been vandalism. MakaylaHippo1998 (talk) 23:56, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Not done. Article is pending changes protected in an attempt to allow good faith edits by non-ac accounts. The rate of vandalism appears to be low enough that semi is not needed for now. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 01:20, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. There are some disruptive edits being added to the article by anonymous users, but they're being added at a rate that's well below the threshold than what would necessitate semi-protection. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 01:24, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Arbitration enforcement per WP:PIA, subject falls under the scope of the restrictions due to its disruption by pro-Palestinian protestors and the resulting controversy. QuicoleJR (talk) 01:21, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Question: QuicoleJR - This article doesn't exist and has no deleted history. Are you sure that you spelled it correctly? ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 01:26, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 03:15, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Every edit for the last three years is an IP or newbie vandalizing the page, and someone reverting it. Could we get long-term or indef semi-protection on this?. WhatamIdoing (talk) 02:40, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Done Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 02:57, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Untamed1910 (talk) 03:15, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Untamed1910 (talk) 03:16, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Untamed1910 (talk) 03:16, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
Before posting a request to this page, please discuss it with the protecting administrator first. You can create a request below only if you receive no response from them.
- To find out which administrator protected the page, go to the page's edit history and click on the "View logs for this page" link (located underneath the page's title). The protecting administrator will be listed in the protection log entry and next to the words
"protected","changed protection level"or"configured pending changes". If there are a large number of log entries on the page, use the drop-down menu near the top of the page and select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" to filter the logs accordingly. - Requests to change the protection level of a template or module from full protection to template protection and be added to this page and without having to discuss it with the protecting administrator first.
- Requests for removing creation protection from a location where no page exists (redlinked pages) are generally handled after a draft version of the intended article is prepared beforehand and ready to be published.
- If you want to request uncontroversial changes to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page and include an explanation of the exact content that you want to change, and what the content will be afterwards. If the talk page is protected, preventing you from adding the request to that location, please use the section below to add an edit request.
If you cannot locate your request, make sure to check the request archives to see if it's been moved there. Only requests that have been recently answered will still be listed here.
Reason: The protection was put in place because too many people were referring to the suspect by name on the talk page while an rfc was ongoing to decide if the name should be included, said rfc finished and concluded it will be listed in the article. There is no need to worry about people putting his name on the talk page now. LachlanTheUmUlGiTurtle (talk) 15:21, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
- Pinging protecting admin Fuzheado. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:32, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
- See the instructions at the top of this page. You are supposed to discuss this with the protecting administrator first, before making a request here. Did you do that? ~Anachronist (talk) 18:45, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
- Ah sorry, I tried to reply to the talk page and it told me I can't and it's first suggestion is to come here without saying anything about doing that first. I should have read this article fully as well. Perhaps the message I was shown should be updated.
- "You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reason:
- This page is currently protected so that only extended confirmed users and administrators can edit it.
- Why is the page protected?
- While most articles can be edited by anyone, extended confirmed protection is sometimes necessary to prevent disruptive editing on controversial pages.
- The reason for protection can be found in the protection log. If there are no relevant entries in the protection log, the page may have been moved after being protected.
- What can I do?
- Request that the page's protection level be reduced.
- Find out more about how to get started editing Wikipedia.
- If you have noticed an error or have a suggestion for a simple, non-controversial change, please check the talk page first in case the issue is already being discussed. If the issue has not been discussed yet, you can submit an edit request at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Edit. Make sure to clearly describe which page your request is about, and which change exactly you are requesting.
- If you wrote any text, please save it temporarily to your device until you can edit this page."
- LachlanTheUmUlGiTurtle (talk) 19:17, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment) I'll note that this article has been asked about and declined here a few times in the past two weeks. But also Fuzheado replied to another editor who asked them about lowering this talk page yesterday and declined any lowering at this time. Zinnober9 (talk) 19:37, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
- I've looked over the linked reply, Fuzheado addresses whether his initial change to ECP was warranted which I've just attempted to reply with "I agree it was warranted at the time due to issues with the name of the suspect being put up many times. But now that's no longer an issue with the RFC concluded I think ECP is excessive."
- But for some reason the "reply" button is greyed out, I don't understand why LachlanTheUmUlGiTurtle (talk) 19:59, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
Unprotection: the template has less than 30 transclusions now. - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 00:39, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Current protection level is a bit excessive for a template with so few transclusions. - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 03:43, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Reason: The article was made extended-protected on 20 August 2021 during the end of the Afghan war when there was massive disruptive edits on all sides. Since then, many Afghan-related articles, the War in Afghanistan (2001–2021), Fall of Kabul (2021), even the Taliban article itself were moved to semi-protected. However, this one was not moved despite it being far less-edited than those other articles. I request to move this to semi-protected status. Saad Jatt (talk) 13:30, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This user who requested protection has been blocked from editing Wikipedia.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:26, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
Please add an edit request to the talk page of the protected page before adding an edit request here
Edit requests should be made on the talk page of the protected article. You can create an edit request below only if the talk page is also protected, preventing you from adding a request there.
- You may add the appropriate template (
{{Edit protected}},{{Edit template-protected}},{{Edit extended-protected}}, or{{Edit semi-protected}}) to the article's talk page if you would like to request an edit be made. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - For edit requests being made due to the editor having a conflict of interest with the article subject (see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}template should be used instead of the others listed above. - Requests to move pages that are currently move-protected should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not on this page.
- This page is not for holding discussions regarding content. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit that you wish to be performed.
Otherwise, this is the correct place to use in order to add an edit request if you are unable to add one to the article's talk page. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to properly add a request.
Handled requests
A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
| 14 protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 01:16, 16 September 2025 (UTC) |
| 69 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 20:54, 15 September 2025 (UTC) |
WP:PERM
| Requests for autopatrolled |
|---|
Autopatrolled
Requested this permission ~2 months ago, denied because I was mostly creating auto-notable stubs. I think I have expanded the types of articles I create, including well-sourced local pages or biographical entries where I take time to source subjects that do not inherently meet a generic notability criteria. (I still do create auto-notable pages sometimes, but those no longer make up the majority of pages I create.) As a new page reviewer, I got good experience with the notability guidelines reviewing articles during the backlog drive WP:MAY25, and also participating in AfD. Thought about requesting again as I have run into a few of my own pages while reviewing pages that are in topics I contribute to/am interested in. Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 02:15, 28 June 2025 (UTC)
I have created more than 25 non redirect articles within the past few weeks and 53 non redirects overall. The two mainspace ones that have been deleted were by my own request, thanks to a slip of the "Publish changes" button. Aside from those, all have been approved by the adminteam. I would greatly be thankful to receive this permission. Luxtaythe2nd (Talk to me...) 17:56, 26 July 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I would like to request the autopatrolled user right. I have created around 30 well-sourced, policy-compliant articles on the English Wikipedia. In addition to my contributions here, I am an administrator (sysop) on the Persian Wikipedia (fa.wikipedia), where I have been active for many years, focusing on content creation, vandalism control, and community support. Granting this right would help reduce the workload of new page patrollers, as my article creations usually meet Wikipedia’s quality standards. Thank you very much for your time and consideration. Best regards, Shahnamk (talk) 19:08, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
As a part of Wikipedia: Tambayan Philippines and the Music Task Force, I would like to request the autopatrolled user right. I have created over 25 articles, most of which are currently live and have been built with careful attention to WP:N, WP:V, and reliable sourcing. And also I understand that the autopatrolled right is meant to ease the workload of new page reviewrs by automatically marking new pages from trusted users as reviewed. Thank you! AdobongPogi masarap 🍛 04:21, 30 July 2025 (UTC)
After a few months break, I have decided to become active on the English Wikipedia once more. In this new period of activity, I look forward to creating new articles of high quality. As a New page patroller myself, I know how much of a backlog there is. Since I have created a considerable amount of clean articles in the past (mostly related to history, geography and entomology), and am hoping to make many more in the future, I am requesting the Autopatrolled right to slightly ease the work of patrollers such as myself. Thank you! UserMemer (chat) Tribs 21:44, 21 August 2025 (UTC)
I am returning to request full rights after the three-month trial period expired. During the trial period, I encountered no issues and successfully created many articles to contribute to Women in Red/Missing articles by nationality/Myanmar. Hteiktinhein (talk) 07:53, 25 August 2025 (UTC)
I am requesting autopatrolled rights. I have created more than 25 articles (see Special:Contributions/Spinin), primarily focused on cricket and sports-related topics. I consistently follow Wikipedia's core content policies such as WP:N (Notability), WP:V (Verifiability), and WP:BLP (Biographies of Living Persons). My contributions are based on reliable sources and maintain a neutral and encyclopedic tone. I take care to ensure that the articles meet Wikipedia's notability and sourcing guidelines. I believe that having autopatrolled rights will help reduce the workload on new page reviewers. Thank you for your time and consideration. Spinin (talk) 02:13, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
I wish to request Autopatrolled rights please. This was previously granted, and has recently expired. I have created 256 articles in the last 21 months Martin Ojsyork (talk) 22:24, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
Permission was revoked at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&logid=169754554 . The permission was revoked four months ago before I recently returned after 14 years of absence from the project, please reinstate. Sswonk (talk) 15:03, 9 September 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access |
|---|
AutoWikiBrowser
I am requesting access to AutoWikiBrowser in order to assist with routine maintenance tasks. Having this tool will hopefully enable me to work more efficiently, reduce manual workload, and ensure consistency in edits. After reading the guide, I believe I am now familiar with relevant policies and will use the tool responsibly, restricting its use to appropriate tasks. Thank you. Keironoshea (talk) 08:30, 29 August 2025 (UTC)
Requesting access to AutoWikiBrowser to assist with smaller maintenance tasks and working more efficiently in general. Thanks! The Wonk (talk) 22:32, 29 August 2025 (UTC)
Hi, I’m requesting AWB access to add categories (which I usually add manually), fix typos, and tag articles that contain a lot of LLM content, like over here [8]. I know AWB doesn’t detect it automatically, but tagging articles after reviewing would make cleanup easier. Jesus isGreat7 ☾⋆ | Ping Me 14:43, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
I previously had this permission before taking a multi-year wiki break. Would love to get it back. Mainly plan to work on cleaning up Category:Infoboxes with unknown parameters. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 05:27, 11 September 2025 (UTC)
Reason for requesting... I thought that i am fulfilling the criteria and with the help of it,contribution will be rightful. Spbvj (talk) 15:14, 11 September 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for confirmation |
|---|
Confirmed
I am CoolEditor25, a new editor with 50 edits focused on improving article. I need Confirmed status to contribute more effectively to semi-protected pages and expand Pakistan-related articles. My contributions: [Special:Contributions/CoolEditor25] Reason: To participate in WikiProject tasks requiring Confirmed access. Thanks! -- CoolEditer25 (talk) 10:49, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
Reason for requesting confirmed rights so that I may upload the image file for the "DOLLA Good Girl GONE Bad" concert promotional image and continue referenced, trusted editing to the Dolla (Girl Group) wikipedia page. RegelGoose (talk) 14:56, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Please manually confirm my alternate account. While it will only be used for editing my talk page (see info on user page), hopefully this will preemptively prevent the account tripping edit filters or being stuck in CAPTCHA issues. Thanks. Taking Out The Trash (talk) 20:15, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for extended confirmation |
|---|
Extended confirmed |
| Requests for new page reviewer |
|---|
New page reviewer
I'd like to be granted reviewer rights primarily to review redirects. I have experience in creating redirects, having made over 100 of them in my time as an editor, and so far none have been deleted (barring one I accidentally created as a typo). All of those (apart from ones made when I was new to editing) additionally have proper rcat documentation and whatnot. Granted, I've never written an article, and the vast majority of my 6000+ edits are minor ones mostly dealing with formatting alterations. However, I've never been blocked, nor have I had any complaints about my behaviour towards other users, so I'd like to think that I could be trusted to use these permissions responsibly. I've also began several successful AfD discussions, showing that I have knowledge in article guidelines, particularly notability. Thank you for your consideration :D Loytra (talk) 11:27, 9 September 2025 (UTC)
I believe that I have the adequate experience necessary for this permission. I myself have experience in creating pages, and have created many more redirect pages as well, and I welcome and learn from any feedback that reviewers provide me when making these articles. I have also been well-versed in WP:NOTABILITY, and feel I have a good understanding of how any new article can meet such criteria to stay on Wikipedia. Additionally, I have experience in initiating or participating in AfD discussions, and interacting with editors to take the best next steps forward with them. Red0ctober22 (talk) 02:55, 12 September 2025 (UTC)
I patrol new articles within the purview of WikiProject Canada quite regularly, and I figure it only makes sense that I be able to review the good ones as I go. The bulk of my work here has been in article creation (somewhere around 80) and reviewing drafts at AfC. MediaKyle (talk) 14:48, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
I have thoroughly read and understood the procedures listed at WP:NPP and am now requesting the right to help combat the large backlog. During my time as an active AfC reviewer I have became very familiar with content policies and guidelines. My edits show I can communicate effectively while remaining civil and that I have no history of blocks or other sanctions. – AllCatsAreGrey (talk) 15:38, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Requesting renewal of my temporary right which expires 5 days from now. Electricmemory (talk) 17:57, 15 September 2025 (UTC) |
| Requests for page mover |
|---|
Page mover
I am applying for the permission of page mover so that I will be able to carry out page moves without worrying about being blocked due to the target page already having a redirect, which then requires me to make a technical request and fill up the backlog. This particularly would help when the grammar or spacing of an article title is changed, and if there are subordinate articles relating to the main article, I will be able to change them as well en masse. I believe I meet all of the basic requirements, and I do have significant experience in page moving, and especially in initiating and participating in move discussions. A few examples of successful page moves I initiated and discussed in were: Sirius XM → SiriusXM, American Athletic Conference → American Conference (NCAA), and Delaware Valley → Philadelphia metropolitan area. I also participated a lot in the discussion to ultimately have the Stanley Cup Finals page changed to Stanley Cup Final. Using the example of SiriusXM, when the title was changed to reflect the official branding and common usage by removing the space, this required the titles of all of the pages for SiriusXM channels to be changed as well. I was able to change some, but not all, and this required me to have to fill up a backlog on the WP:RM page, which obviously have been more efficient with this permission. Red0ctober22 (talk) 12:42, 10 September 2025 (UTC)
I am hereby requesting the page mover privilege. On multiple occasions I had to request uncontroversial moves, as I was not able to move the page myself. Most of these requests were due to WP:NPP and requested after reverting the WP:CUTNPASTE moves by other editors and re-doing the moves properly. Usually I helped the editors to request the move themselves, see, for example User talk:Worvandae#Renaming the page, but on few occasions I had requested the move myself to assist the original editor (see, for example, Talk:Spotsylvania Courthouse, Virginia). Sometimes I needed the move to unscramble the situation in the article I was working on, see, for example, Talk:Iron oxide red#Requested move 13 May 2023. I also create articles in my user space and occasionally need to move them over a redirect, the latest one was User:Викидим/Mikogami. I do have the corresponding right in Russian Wikipedia. Викидим (talk) 06:17, 13 September 2025 (UTC) |
| Requests for pending changes reviewer |
|---|
Pending changes reviewer
I have been editing and patrolling for some time, and feel like I could be of greater help to the site with these permissions. Jcgaylor (talk) 20:36, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
I've been editing Wikipedia on and off for 3 years (!) at this point, often undertaking anti-vandalism activities. Being a pending changes reviewer would allow me to expand my service to the community. In addition to anti-vandalism, I'm also familiar with the NPOV, copyright, Verifiability, etc. policies. Ludus56 (talk) 03:14, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for rollback |
|---|
Rollback
I've been RC patrolling for a few years now, requesting rollback right so I can fight vandalism more effectively and use the anti-vandal tools that require it. 『π』BalaM314〘talk〙 13:43, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
I was active in fighting vandalism from 2022-2023 before I had to take a break for personal reasons. Now I am back on Wikipedia and I have been patrolling recent changes and reverting vandalism for a few days. I'm also a pending changes reviewer and have done some work including reverting unconstructive edits on that front. I would like rollback as it would help me fight vandalism better and faster. HurricaneZeta (talk) 15:15, 10 September 2025 (UTC) (original request placed 18:54, 8 September 2025 (UTC))
I want rollback to combat vandalism. I'm a pretty bad writer so I think this is the best way for me to contribute to Wikipedia. My alternate account is Punch321 which I lost the password to so edits are also me. Punch4321 (talk) 19:35, 10 September 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I've been doing recent changes patrolling on a regular basis, and asking for rollbacking rights to increase my effeciency on my counter-vandalism efforts. I meet all the prerequisites mentioned in the instructions. Krsnaquli (🙏) 17:21, 11 September 2025 (UTC)
I have been patrolling recent changes for some time and have just come off a break. I want to edit and revert more frequently, so I think rollback rights would help me do that better. Lflin16 - Recent changes (talk) 23:19, 11 September 2025 (UTC)
I have been patrolling Special:RecentChanges and Special:AbuseLog for about 40-50 days, definitely more than a month, and have collected over 610 edits, most of which are reverts of vandalism. I have only been given one warning regarding my editing, a contentious topics BLP alert, and have never engaged in edit warring or been blocked. Although I was more careless about warning users earlier, I always place {{uw}}s when I revert edits, except in the most minor and routine reversions. As everything moves very quickly at Special:RecentChanges, rollback would help me revert obviously bad-faith edits quicker and also possibly use AntiVandal and Huggle. Somepinkdude (talk) 12:35, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for template editor |
|---|
Template editor
I would like to request the template editor right again so I may be able to update the URL source references over at Module:College color/data and Module:Gridiron color/data. I believe I previously possessed this right, and I would like the privilege to possess this right again to help the Wikipedia editor community. I know that I have learned from my past editing discussions with other editors, and I know that I can be responsibly trusted to possess this right, should it be re-granted to me. I hereby thoroughly promise not to unilaterally impose my proposed changes to protected templates without first engaging with other editors to reach WP:CONSENSUS. I am also here to listen to other editors and to respect established WP:CONSENSUS and not try to impose my changes if they go against the established WP:CONSENSUS, should I be re-granted the template editor right again. I know that part of being a responsible template editor is to first test proposed changes in the sandbox first and then get feedback from other editors before implementing changes to protected templates. CharlesEditor23 (talk) 02:18, 9 September 2025 (UTC)
Good day. I've always had a keen interest in templates, and recently have been making many adjustments. I have made many successful template edit requests over the years, and particularly recently both on en-wiki and on Commons. I am taking an interest in accessibility (specifically applying my knowledge of W3C ARIA which seems is not so common on en-wiki) and dark mode compatibility. I've reach the point where there's certian edits I could do myself safer than via edit requests, as sometimes things can get lost in translation. I hope my editing history is reflective of this. I am trustworthy, long-time editor who has slowly built their knowledge of en-wiki. I'd be so glad to be part of the template-editor team. waddie96 ★ (talk) 06:20, 10 September 2025 (UTC)
|
Usage
{{Admin dashboard/header}}
{{Admin dashboard/ab}}
{{#ifeq:{{Yesno|{{{showaiv|7 days}}}}}|yes|{{#ifexpr:{{#time:U|-{{{showaiv|7 days}}}}}-{{#time:U|{{REVISIONTIMESTAMP:WP:Administrator intervention against vandalism}}}} <= 0|{{Admin dashboard/aiv}}}}}}
{{Admin dashboard/csd}}
{{Admin dashboard/uaarfpp}}
{{Admin dashboard/rfarfp
| 1 = {{{style|}}}{{#if:{{{showperm|}}}|
{{!}} showperm {{=}} {{{showperm}}} }}{{#if:{{{showrfab|}}}|
{{!}} showrfab {{=}} {{{showrfab}}} }}{{#if:{{{showacc|}}}|
{{!}} showacc {{=}} {{{showacc}}}} }}{{#if:{{{showaptl|}}}|
{{!}} showaptl {{=}} {{{showaptl}}} }}{{#if:{{{showawb|}}}|
{{!}} showacc {{=}} {{{showawb}}}} }}{{#if:{{{showconf|}}}|
{{!}} showconf {{=}} {{{showconf}}} }}{{#if:{{{showfmvr|}}}|
{{!}} showext {{=}} {{{showext}}} }}{{#if:{{{showacc|}}}|
{{!}} showacc {{=}} {{{showevco}}}} }}{{#if:{{{showext|}}}|
{{!}} showfmvr {{=}} {{{showfmvr}}} }}{{#if:{{{showmms|}}}|
{{!}} showmms {{=}} {{{showmms}}} }}{{#if:{{{showrevr|}}}|
{{!}} shownpr {{=}} {{{shownpr}}} }}{{#if:{{{shownpr|}}}|
{{!}} showpmvr {{=}} {{{showpmvr}}} }}{{#if:{{{showpmvr|}}}|
{{!}} showrevr {{=}} {{{showrevr}}} }}{{#if:{{{showrlbk|}}}|
{{!}} showrlbk {{=}} {{{showrlbk}}} }}{{#if:{{{showte|}}}|
{{!}} showte {{=}} {{{showte}}} }}
}}
{{Admin dashboard/footer|newadmin={{{newadmin|no}}}}}<!--
You can re-arrange the order or pick and choose by transcluding elements separately -->
Note that directly transcluding the template or using all the subtemplates above can cause the page to exceed the post-expand include size.
Parameters
TemplateData for Admin dashboard
Administrators Dashboard
| Parameter | Description | Type | Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| style | 1 | Backwards compatibility. Not entirely show of purpose at this time.
| String | optional |
| New administrator | newadmin | Allows you to toggle the 'New administrators' navbox on/off. Set to 'yes' to transclude.
| String | optional |
| Show AIV | showaiv | Allows you to toggle the WP:AIV section on/off. Set to 'no' to prevent transclusion.
| String | optional |
| Show PERM | showperm | Allows control over the entire WP:PERM section in one parameter. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show sections that have had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show RfA/RfB | showrfab | Allows hiding the requests for RfA/RfB section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show account creator | showacc | Allows hiding the requests for account creator section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show autopatrolled | showaptl | Allows hiding the requests for autopatrolled section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show confirmed | showconf | Allows hiding the requests for confirmed section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show extended confirmed | showext | Allows hiding the requests for extended confirmed section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show file mover | showfmvr | Allows hiding the requests for file mover section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show new page reviewer | shownpr | Allows hiding the requests for new page reviewer section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show page mover | showpmvr | Allows hiding the requests for page mover section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show reviewer | showrevr | Allows hiding the requests for reviewer section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show rollback | showrlbk | Allows hiding the requests for rollback section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show template editor | showte | Allows hiding the requests for template editor section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |