At Wikipedia, remember to be bold! This means that you should not be afraid to change any articles. This is because, if you make any mistakes, you can always fix it later! If you have any questions, you can always ask them at Simple Talk.
If you need help just click here and type {{helpme}} and your question.
I saw on Wikipedia:Simple talk that you were looking for help with Minnesota articles. As the weather improves, I want to work on Michigan articles and am willing to help with articles on Minnesota as well! Let me know if this interests you! WMrapids (talk) 01:26, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
An editor has requested deletion of Orange Cat Funny, a page you created. We appreciate your changes, but the nominator doesn't believe that the page meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").
You may also change the page during the discussion to address the nominator's concerns. But you should not remove the requests for deletion template from the top of the page; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you very much. Ternera (talk) 19:59, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
No it's not a bot. Ive made it as a program to quickly add cleanup tags and stubs to pages. I am making edits so quickly because I am using Special:Random to quickly find articles that have no sources to quickly add the no sources tag. It works for other tags too. If you want to try and use it you can copy page This Script into your common.js. If there is any bugs please tell me about them. Ieditrandomarticles (talk | contribs) 15:08, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know why this happens. I've checked the HTML code and the button is displaying as 48px:48px which should be a perfectly fine size but for some reason it just doesn't want to abide by its code. I'm looking into this, please bear with me! Ieditrandomarticles (talk | contribs) 00:53, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Please note that tagging articles like this en masse is strongly discouraged. It actively makes articles look worse for years on end, without having any impact on the actual problem at hand. For instance, with Amondans, the one source tag did not need to be added to the article. It did have one source, so yes, it technically can have the tag on, but is that truly the issue here? The article is not difficult to verify, or controversial in what it contains. The issue is its length, but there is no problem in the sourcing with its current length, therefore this tag is not really appropriate here. Please try and fix issues yourself or consider whether a tag is truly necessary as a first port of call. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 21:31, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Ieditrandomarticles. I noticed that you were adding categories to articles -- thanks very much for doing that.
I would like to ask that you add a more complete set of categories, though, so that we don't lose track of articles that need more. As soon as one category is added, the article no longer appears as uncategorized and we don't have anything to point out that more are needed.
For example, this change you made added a category for business people. Categories for people need more than that. They need categories for birth and death years (or the living people category if the person is alive) and for where they are from. They might need others depending on the person. I've started trying to add categories to address the "Five Ws": who, what, when, where, and why. Some article don't need all of those, but they're a good way to think about it.
Thanks, those categories are pretty good. The only thing missing is something indicating his nationality, and maybe place of birth (if he was born somewhere that we have a "People from" category for). -- Auntof6 (talk) 01:09, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, you do know there are templates for RFD votes? They are: keep, {{vk}}, Delete: {{vd}}, QD: {{vqd}} . These are the main ones. Cactus🌵spikyツ10:50, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
oh wait I figured it out, I have a script which highlight unreliable references. Your's looked orange to me as it had a reference in it. Cactus🌵spikyツ12:54, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I have closed you GA nomination as not done as there are still issues to be addressed. Please free feel to renominate when you feel it is ready. Cactus🌵spikyツ09:36, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I've granted you the Rollback flag. Please review the rules regarding it's use and remember it's only for vandalism. fr33kman20:43, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed Ieditrandomarticles (talk | contribs) 12:07, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
Cactus🌵 spiky ツ 10:03, 27 April 2025 (UTC)
