User talk:UpTheOctave!
Talk?
Archives: 1
Click here to start a new section
Yoshi's New Island feedback
[edit]Hello UpTheOctave!, I hope all is well. Thank you so much for providing an in-depth source review during the second FA nomination for Yoshi's New Island. After giving it some time, I'm considering renominating the article (ideally for the last time). I wanted to check in with you beforehand to see if you had any additional suggestions for me. To my knowledge, only one reference has been added, but I just wanted to be certain. No rush whatsoever. Much appreciated! ★ The Green Star Collector ★ (talk) 00:36, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
- Hi, thanks for stopping by; it's nice to hear from you again. I'm quite well, I've just not felt much motivation to edit recently.
- I can't see any glaring problems at present, but I'd recommend making a final sweep of the literature to detect gaps, since I remember the lack of Japanese sourcing was a prior issue. I doubt it would be worth doing another source review given the lack of changes, but I might have some feedback on prose at an FAC. Feel free to ping as with last time. Thanks, UpTheOctave! • 8va? 14:20, 23 September 2025 (UTC)
September music
[edit]![]() | |
story · music · places |
---|
John Rutter 80 today! I sang his major choral works with four choirs, and many of his uplifting anthems, 13 DYK? I watched him explain his Magnificat in person in 1998, and now see it on Youtube: he wore the same outfit. - There's a discussion for Joseph Haydn. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 23:01, 24 September 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you Gerda, nice to talk. I'm not very interested in infobox discussions (too much dramah), but thank you for the links. I didn't know about Rutter today, nice surprise. UpTheOctave! • 8va? 10:40, 25 September 2025 (UTC)
- No drama yet there, you can just say which parameters you would want, as we did for W. B. Yeats. - My story today is about the principal violin of the Concentus Musicus; she would have been 95 OTD. I felt connected when the second oboist of our recent concert, of Haydn's Stabat Mater, said that he built an English horn for his performance of the work with the Concentus Musicus. - Concert weekend pictured in "places". --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:40, 26 September 2025 (UTC)
wiki page changes
[edit]Hello. You left a msg on my page about changes made to an author's page. I am the author's secretary. I had been asked to amend the wiki page to reflect the author's career, highlights etc, and not where she attended school, which is irrelevant information. Cloonfower (talk) 08:01, 1 October 2025 (UTC)
- Hi there @Cloonfower. I'm sympathetic to your circumstances, but there are several reasons why your editing was unacceptable.
- To start with, as Woods' secretary you have a special conflict of interest we call paid editing. Since Wikipedia is meant to be neutral and you are paid to assist Woods in matters including promotion, there's a clear disconnect of aims here. I've posted a further explanation of our policies regarding paid editing on your talk page, but essentially you...
- Must disclose your employer publicly, preferably on your userpage as well as any pages affected (e.g. Evie Woods).
- Should not edit affected pages directly and instead request changes with the {{edit COI}} template.
- Should respect that this is a volunteer project and keep discussions reasonable and short.
- Now for the particulars of your edits. The primary reason I reverted your edit was that it removed valid information from reliable sources without a good explanation. On Wikipedia we must source statements to reliable sources as this is an encyclopedia, not a place for original thought. The article is not "irrelevant information": we naturally mirror what reliable sources discuss, as we assume that what they report on is important. As such, it was wrong for you to replace the entire article with an unsourced alternative.
- Additionally, the content you inserted was very promotional, which is unacceptable on Wikipedia. We are not a soapbox or a place for advertisements as we strive to keep a neutral view. I get this may conflict with your employment, but if you continue to edit promotionally you are liable to be blocked. In future edit requests, please try and maintain a neutral tone with no puffery. Relying on reliable sources will help you with this style of writing.
- Finally, the text you inserted was taken verbatim from Woods' website. This is unnaceptable and violated Woods' copyright, even if you are related to her as her secretary. Without proper permission, this is a copyright violation and will be removed. I've you given more information about this on your talk page and have taken care of it this time: please do not insert the same text again or you may be blocked for further violations of our copyright policies.
- As I said, I'm sympathetic that this is your job, but there are some changes you need to make to your editing if this is to work. If you have any more questions please do not hesitate to ask. I know this is confusing and often really complicated, so I'm here to help if you need. Best, UpTheOctave! • 8va? 13:49, 1 October 2025 (UTC)
- I appreciate the enthusiasm. Cloonfower (talk) 13:59, 1 October 2025 (UTC)
Anyone else sick and tired of speedy deletion when you wrote it?
[edit]I wrote the historical notes and took the photos taken of my historical property but because I allowed the DHR, historical dept of Virginia to use it, I am getting speedy deleted. It is found on their site with my permission. As well it is a fair use site due to being a government historical education site. I am being denied to put them on Wikipedia.
Who else is tired of the garbage?? Dfblizz (talk) 17:11, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
- Hi @Dfblizz, thanks for reaching out. I recognise you're frustrated, but what I did was based on the information I had at the time. Now that you've told me about this, I'd like to help you get the information on Wikipedia, if you still want that.
- I tagged your sandbox for deletion as, from what I could see, the text there is under a copyright notice ("© 2025 All Rights Reserved") from the Virginia Department of Historic Resources. In accordance with our copyright policies, we generally don't allow any material from other copyrighted websites for legal reasons, which led me to tag the page for speedy deletion. With no way of knowing the background, like in this case, this is the process we would usually follow.
- I gather from what you're saying that you are the author as credited on the original form. If so, I believe you're right that the copyright may still lie with you unless you signed it over when completing the form. In this case, we would need to verify your identity to make sure you are who you say you are, as we can't know who's really behind a username. You can find information about the process at this page. Without this permission, I still believe we're still hosting a verbatim copy of an in-copyright work, so the speedy deletion should stand.
- I sincerely hope you're not offended; I meant no disrespect when tagging the page. It was purely a legal consideration based on the information that was available at that time. This is a volunteer project and most of us contribute from a love of open knowledge, so I'd be glad to help you if you have any more questions. All the best, UpTheOctave! • 8va? 17:46, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
- I never gave up the copy-write and their notice on their page is standard for the "Government" page. Although I had already confirmed at State and federal levels that both their historical pages using my writing and photos from my computer are fair use as these are public access sites for education. And I had to agree to that when I submitted all this information to them. Myself and my historical research agent wrote the 10 pages plus that got us these affirmations and protections to the property when submitted to relevant agencies. Dfblizz (talk) 17:57, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
- Well I went to the page you said "this page" with hypertag and nothing. Could you be more specific?
- I found this page, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Declaration_of_consent_for_all_enquiries
- but that says it refers to things listed in "commons" and says to email it but doesnt give an email. As well this is 3 links deep from your "this page" link so I felt it prude-full to ask for specifics. Dfblizz (talk) 18:04, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
- When you say you allowed the writings and photographs to be used as fair use, it sounds like you were allowing them to use your material as they are educational sites: that's different to what we require on Wikipedia. As we are a freely licensed encyclopedia, we require you to release the text under a free license (usually the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA) and the GNU Free Documentation License). We cannot accept large portions of text as fair use as anyone must be able to share, distribute, transmit, and adapt text on Wikipedia. Because this may include commercial works, we can't use materials licensed only for educational use.
- As detailed in the page I sent (Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials), if you still want to release this content under a free license where anyone can use it, you should send an email to
permissions-en@wikimedia.org
from an address linked to the original application form to prove your identity. You can find a template to do that at the link in the page I gave you, which you've found at Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries. Thanks, UpTheOctave! • 8va? 18:19, 2 October 2025 (UTC)- Fine, sent the email with ALL 60 pages of information I hold copy-write to that was submitted to the Government as well as a couple of photos. Dfblizz (talk) 18:43, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
- I guess the question is now what? Dfblizz (talk) 18:44, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
- Now I remove the speedy deletion template and put a {{Permission pending}} template instead while we wait. It could take a while as it is a volunteer service, but once it's done the text should be appropriately licensed for use. Thank you for your openness and patience. UpTheOctave! • 8va? 18:47, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
- OK, thank you, that sounds fine. But even my "self" page would be listing my many art and published articles in multiple real world physical magazines. How is this not to happen again. My ARTicles are published and normally the automobile magazines retains copy-write however as I drew the cars and parts and didn't submit writing with "photos" I retained the ownership and copy-write under the art submission ownership law.
- I don't want to start writing all of that up just to have to jump through hoops trying to constantly fix the page of my submissions as most links would be where they were published. Dfblizz (talk) 18:54, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
- I can only see this in "talk" and there is no permission pending.
- When looking to the original link to where it needs to go there is nothing.
- How do I see my submission in its correct place on Wiki and know when it is being finished/ approved? Dfblizz (talk) 19:05, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
- There's quite a lot to cover here, so I'll do my best with breaking it up.
- Re: permissions for submissions, I believe you must do the same copyright release for all text you would want to share with Wikipedia. It's quite cumbersome I know, but that keeps everything legal. It's also why most editors don't use pre-existing text and write exclusively for Wikipedia, since copyright is so complex. (Incidentally, you'll see at the bottom of our edit windows, we have the fine print saying that every edit is released under a free license.)
- Re: your "self" page. If you're talking about a userpage, disregard this. If you're talking about writing an article about yourself, we strongly discourage that for the reasons laid out on our relevant page, WP:Autobiography. Basically, everyone has a strong conflict-of-interest with writing about themselves as we'd be prone to leave out negative details or brush things under the carpet. As we strive to find a neutral point of view on Wikipedia, we require editors who have conflicts of interest with articles to disclose them.
- Re: the talk page, on Wikipedia we have several distinct areas of the project known as namespaces. It appears you've duplicated the article at the talk page and your user sandbox: we prefer submissions to be in the sandbox or a special drafting namespace, so I'm going to tag the talk page for a no-fault deletion purely on maintenance grounds. I see you've made some changes, so I'll copy those over. All the details are in your sandbox anyway, so nothing is lost here.
- Re: submission, we usually use new editors to use our articles for creation reviewing service: I've put a header with information regarding that on the sandbox. You should read that page and Help:Your first article for information on how to properly write and submit a draft according to our policies. I wouldn't recommend doing it just now until you have more sources to show notability, but given that it's on the NRHP and VLR that's a strong start.
- I get that this is a lot of information. If you have any questions at all please ask. Best, UpTheOctave! • 8va? 19:25, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
- I am being told this in email,
- "Dear D Forsyth,
- at the mentioned link the does exist any page. Please create the article or draft and please let me know afterwards.
- Yours sincerely,
- Alfred Neumann"
- I replied it was in the sandbox but no response. Dfblizz (talk) 20:43, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
- I expect you should get a response unless the ticket was closed; I'd wait and see if they reply. If you haven't done so yet, it would be good to specify that the draft is found at <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Dfblizz/sandbox>.
- Best, UpTheOctave! • 8va? 20:49, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
- can you explain to me why in the world are other "editors" are deleting my page when it is already confirmed my copy-write and enough sources that it beats ALL other historical property listing shown????????????
- I cannot even send a mesg to this newest editor crapping on my submission as wiki is so bloated with unneeded protocols to reach someone! Dfblizz (talk) 21:34, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
- Hi. I'm not sure why the page was deleted when I removed the tag and have reached out to the deleting administrator. I know this is frustrating; I did say to not submit the article in its current state, but regardless it should've just been declined not deleted. I am going to try and fix this for you, I'd recommend taking a step back while everything gets sorted. Thanks, UpTheOctave! • 8va? 21:45, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
- Well it didn't just get deleted but a "different" editor now is claiming my x7 references to government websites and newspapers is not enough even though many and I mean many of the other historical articles have next to nothing for references. And now that it is out right deleted by a person who did nothing to check the copy-write I have to start from scratch.
- And a different "editor" had said it was not in the right place as the sandbox was not where it was supposed to be.
- I DID send in the release of copy-write and it was accepted.
- What in the world it going on???? Dfblizz (talk) 21:52, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
- Now I get this????
- "Hello, Dfblizz! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 21:04, 2 October 2025 (UTC)"
- Which does NOTHING. He wont address what he did and is outright dismissing me and my work to be handed off to someone else because he now doesn't have time to address the problem he created. But he did have enough to screw me over. Dfblizz (talk) 21:57, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
- The draft was declined because it didn't show those references. Your writing did cite the historical places register, but a reviewer could easily miss all the information you researched for the application form since you did not put that in the draft. That's why I said to not submit just now as it doesn't show how the farm is notable. I'm not saying it isn't notable, just that it didn't show that. That's why you recieved that message from Theroadislong; it's not out of malice or screwing you over, and you would do well to not insinuate that.
- As I said, I don't know why the sandbox was deleted and have reached out to the administrator who deleted it. I also don't know what you mean by the sandbox being the wrong place, it's always been a valid place to draft articles.
- Now, I want to help you, but I'm worried that if you continue to use the tone exhibited in comments like these it may lead to sanctions. We are all volunteers here: no-one is trying to screw you over or disrespect you. I recognise there has been a lot of crossed wires today, which I do believe can get sorted out, but not like this. Please assume good faith on behalf of our volunteers, and they will do likewise. Thanks, UpTheOctave! • 8va? 22:03, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
- There is no "good faith" when ppl just push a button to delete my work without researching anything at all. Dfblizz (talk) 22:07, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
- After I submitted my release of copy-write it was accepted. But then I received an email from "permissions@wikimedia.org" where another "editor" saying:
- Dear D Forsyth,
- at the mentioned link the does exist any page. Please create the article or draft and please let me know afterwards.
- Yours sincerely,
- Alfred Neumann
- I did let the person know and that it was in the sandbox and then boom the other x2 editors refused it and deleted it. How is anything getting done when so many ppl can and are doing whatever they want.
- The references were there when they deleted it. It is malice if they refuse to do their job to the level they are expected to do it. And as they have been informed of the mistakes refuse to do anything about it. If someone is so quick to destroy someones efforts then they should be just as quick to fix what they did wrong.
- This is literally copy and paste, so explain how this "editor" can even do the job when he cant even write a clear sentence to me or use spellcheck which is offered as I type? Dfblizz (talk) 22:18, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
- I am not a VRT agent so don't know what goes on behind the scenes, but a lot of agents are bilingual and may not speak English as a first language, so I'd avoid too heavy a critique on that front. I'll refer you to my message below which I think covers everything else here. But again, a reminder to please try and assume good faith. I really don't want this situation to get any more out of hand. UpTheOctave! • 8va? 22:31, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
- Up front thank you for defending me.
- Now I have not one "editor" trying to stop this article that has been verfied but 2.
- Nthep deleted it.
- and
- Theroadislong is who refused to publish it.
- I am sick and tired of meeting Wiki standards and protocols on this and having inept ppl calling themselves editors (real editors do research with the author) stomping on me. This is why I thanked you as you did just that and worked with me to sort it out only to have others do less and delete my work.
- I normally would not reveal this but I am a partially paralyzed 100 % disabled veteran who cannot feel his hands battling cancer for the 4th time. I don't need this hassle when I met the standard and every type stroke is an endurance workout.
- So who is above these ppl who refuse to undo their wrong work so I might in this ridiculous world get this fixed. Dfblizz (talk) 22:06, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
- Hi. I'm not sure why the page was deleted when I removed the tag and have reached out to the deleting administrator. I know this is frustrating; I did say to not submit the article in its current state, but regardless it should've just been declined not deleted. I am going to try and fix this for you, I'd recommend taking a step back while everything gets sorted. Thanks, UpTheOctave! • 8va? 21:45, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
- Now I remove the speedy deletion template and put a {{Permission pending}} template instead while we wait. It could take a while as it is a volunteer service, but once it's done the text should be appropriately licensed for use. Thank you for your openness and patience. UpTheOctave! • 8va? 18:47, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
I don't know everything that's going on so can't comment fully, but people can still make mistakes in good faith. I think the kind of "editor" you're used to is fundamentally different to how we operate here. As you put it, "real" editors do reseach with authors; that can be true in publishing, but as we are all volunteers we do the work we want to do. No-one is under any obligation to help you research, and most "editors" in the Wikipedia sense (think "volunteers") have their own interests and things to do. I want to help you, and that's why I'm sticking around, but equally other editors have the right to do what they want (be that reviewing or deleting), as long as they are within policy. I stress that even if they believe they are acting withing policy but make a mistake, they are not your enemy. Things can be sorted.
I'll be frank with you. Personally, I think Theroadislong was right to decline the draft in that state. While you may have the research and sources to prove the farm is notable, it's on a different website, isn't it? As a reviewer, you have to evaluate what's in front of you, and that's why the draft was declined.
Now I appreciate that this must be quite taxing for you given your personal circumstances, which is why I'm trying my hardest to help. But as I said before, I honestly believe that just letting go for just now and coming back when things are sorted may help your circumstances. I will try and fix this, but if Wikipedia is negatively effecting your health then you should prioritise yourself. The information in that sandbox is already available online on the register, so unless there is a strong reason to get it up under a free license immediately we can afford to wait. Thanks, UpTheOctave! • 8va? 22:21, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
- 1. Wiki already has a list of Virginia historical properties:
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Register_of_Historic_Places_listings_in_Wythe_County,_Virginia
- With ours being the only one on the list that doesn't have a detailed page or photo. So we were trying to remedy this. If I am doing what all the other ones listed have already done, why outright dismiss mine and allow those? What I was writing in whole is NOT on another website. Saying this article doesnt have a place is untrue as the link I provided proves this.
- 2. When people search for historical properties they do NOT get direct links to DHR or other historic web sites due to the government sites not paying for site notice on the web. Nor do they have enough direct traffic to warrant Google to route ppl to that site.
- 3. I was adding more information than what could be found at those sites where I originally wrote the information.
- 4. No one should be called an editor if they are just deleting without checking even internal Wiki correspondence that already showed my having the copy-write. And the note you had put up. How are you not upset that someone stomped on your work.
- 5. If these volunteers are more apt to just hunt down whatever they feel needs deleted like a video game, even to ignore post ups like you put on there, they need to be looked at for doing the job wrong. Paid or not, no one should have a priority to just delete delete delete.
- 6.If I am to give one of your "editors" good faith or better yet benefit of the doubt they have to do the same which you say they will do. However you are the only one to do that. The article was submitted after the email to the permissions dept.
- I am upset because I spent an entire day to do this through my own pain, my choice, only to be dismissed away like a gnat because the ones you want me to give good faith to refuse to give it to me.
- 7. When it was dismissed and deleted it HAD the x7 sources that met all 5 source requirements. While the other articles have the exact same basic 3 sources that do not meet the standard I have to meet, already approved on Wiki.
- Final point, please take a moment to look at the link I put in #1 and how those articles are also using the same sources and also are copy and paste from other government historical sites. Then explain to me how my more detailed, more personally written, more researched article was declined without care or research. Malice or not, they are not doing their jobs when it was already looked at for approval and awaiting me to put it in the "right place". Dfblizz (talk) 22:47, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
- Honestly, I don't know. I admit I wasn't aware of the list, and I didn't see the final state of the draft past when it had three sources. I've looked at the entries and I do agree with you; when the deltion issue is sorted, I recommend you quote our relevant guideline WP:GEOFEAT when submitting. I know how frustrating it can be to have work deleted, but from my time on Wikipedia I can assure you that things usually work out if you wait: all I can say is wait to see how the deleting admin reacts. Until then we could go back and forth, but I don't think that's going to be productive.
- I'm sorry this has been dissapointing, and I know you're finding it hard to assume good faith, but I know this is just a misunderstanding and should be resolved with time. It's pretty late here, so I'm going to log off for the night. I think it might be a good idea to do the same. I'll check in tomorrow to see if I've received any messages. All the best, UpTheOctave! • 8va? 23:08, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
- They are not responding to me, none of the 3 that have put up blockades or deleted it. God complex is my assumption until proven otherwise. Have a good night. Dfblizz (talk) 23:10, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
- @Dfblizz I have to go with what's available. The page was an obvious copy/paste from https://www.dhr.virginia.gov/historic-registers/098-5634/ as it includes all the surrounding text which did not form part of the original dhr submission and contrary to what you wrote on my talk page it does not state that you are the author. When I read the supporting nomination form, it did not indicate that any of the content is yours as the only name given in connection with the submission is David Pezzoni's. You are only mentioned as someone they spoke to while writing the nomination.
- Now I've seen the email you sent, I'll accept that the dhr submission was jointly authored or was a work for hire (see [1]) and I'll restore the sandbox.
- Regarding it's notability I agree that it probably is a notable building but I'll leave that to others to assess.
- @UpTheOctave! Apologies for using your talk page but as there was a lenghty section already here, it seems sensible not to split the discussion across multiple pages. Nthep (talk) 10:33, 3 October 2025 (UTC)
- @Dfblizz, as you can see, your sandbox has been restored. You can work on your articles for creation submission there, but please try and comply with the reviewers. They aren't out to get you, and are only trying to make sure the draft complies with our manual of style and our core content policies. Again, I particularly recommend reading our help page Your first article. If you have any further questions, please direct them cordially to the articles for creation help desk: I'll still be here if you need me, but they are better equipped to answer your questions. All the best, UpTheOctave! • 8va? 12:04, 3 October 2025 (UTC)
- I have moved the draft to Draft:The Andrew and Sarah Fulton Farm and declined it again, I'm afraid it reads nothing like an encyclopaedia article and will need a complete re-write. Theroadislong (talk) 14:22, 3 October 2025 (UTC)
- They are not responding to me, none of the 3 that have put up blockades or deleted it. God complex is my assumption until proven otherwise. Have a good night. Dfblizz (talk) 23:10, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
Rollback granted
[edit]
Hi UpTheOctave!. After reviewing your request, I have enabled rollback on your account. Please keep the following things in mind while using rollback:
- Being granted rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle or Ultraviolet. It just adds a [rollback] button next to a page's latest live revision. It does not grant you any additional "status" on Wikipedia, nor does it change how Wikipedia policies apply to you.
- Rollback should be used to revert clear and unambiguous cases of vandalism only. Never use rollback to revert good faith edits. For more information about when rollback is appropriate, see Wikipedia:Rollback § When to use rollback.
- Rollback should never be used to edit war, and it should never be used in a content-related dispute to restore the page to your preferred revision. If rollback is abused or used for this purpose or any other inappropriate purpose, the permission will be revoked.
- Use common sense. If you're not sure about something, ask!
I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, and feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate use of rollback. If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin) and Wikipedia:Rollback. Good luck and thanks! Malinaccier (talk) 13:45, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you! UpTheOctave! • 8va? 14:37, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
76th Primetime Creative Arts Emmy Awards
[edit]Hi there,
I addressed all your comments regarding the 76th Primetime Creative Arts Emmy Awards for its featured list candidacy. Thank for you feedback. Birdienest81talk 22:40, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
- Replied and passed there. Nice work overall! Best, UpTheOctave! • 8va? 15:25, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
Question
[edit]How are you, Octave, hope you are well? I wanted to ask if you would like to review my FAC nom of Hunter Schafer, and/or my two GA noms? I'll review/expand any article you want, if you like, as thanks? HSLover/DWF (talk) 12:38, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
- Hi DWF, nice to see you back. I'm quite well, thanks for asking. I have a couple of FLC reviews to sort out just now, but I could probably contribute a source review for HS if no-one takes it quickly. I don't need anything in return: writing has been a bit slow lately anyway. Thanks, UpTheOctave! • 8va? 15:33, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
- No one is likely too- it's been 21 days and all it has recieved is a image review. You can ask me anytime if you ever have anything you want reviewed/want help with. HSLover/DWF (talk) 16:35, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
- I'll keep that in mind; thank you for the kind offer. UpTheOctave! • 8va? 16:58, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
- No one is likely too- it's been 21 days and all it has recieved is a image review. You can ask me anytime if you ever have anything you want reviewed/want help with. HSLover/DWF (talk) 16:35, 11 October 2025 (UTC)