Wikipedia:Requests for deletion

Shortcuts

If you think a page should be deleted, read the deletion policy to make sure.
Then follow these instructions on how to request a page for deletion. To find more information on what discussed deletions and quick deletions are:
PLEASE READ THIS

Before nominating: checks and alternatives

Shortcut

WP:BEFORE

Prior to nominating article(s) for deletion, please be sure to:

A. Read and understand these policies and guidelines

The Wikipedia deletion policy, which explains valid grounds for deletion.
The main four guidelines and policies that inform deletion discussions: notability (WP:N), verifiability (WP:V), reliable sources (WP:RS), and what Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)
Subject-specific notability guidelines, which can be found at Category:Wikipedia notability guidelines

B. Carry out these checks

Confirm that the article does not meet the criteria for quick deletion.
If there are verifiability, notability or other sourcing concerns, take reasonable steps to search for reliable sources. (See step D.)
Review the article's history to check for potential vandalism or poor editing.
Read the article's talk page for previous nominations and/or that your objections haven't already been dealt with.
Check "What links here" in the article's sidebar, to see how the page is used and referenced within Wikipedia.
Check if there are interlanguage links, also in the sidebar, which may lead to more developed and better sourced articles. Likewise, search for native-language sources if the subject has a name in a non-Latin alphabet (such as Japanese or Greek), which is often in the lead.

C. Consider whether the article could be improved rather than deleted

If the article can be fixed through normal editing, then it is not a candidate for RfD.
If the article was recently created, please consider allowing the contributors more time to develop the article.
If an article has issues try first raising your concerns on the article's talk page, with the main contributors, and/or adding a cleanup tag, such as {{notability}}, {{hoax}}, {{original research}}, or {{advert}}; this ensures readers are aware of the problem and may act to fix it.
If the topic is not important enough to merit an article on its own, consider merging or redirecting to an existing article. This should be done particularly if the topic name is a likely search term.

D. Search for additional sources, if the main concern is notability

The minimum search expected is a normal Google search, a Google Books search, a Google News search, and a Google News archive search; Google Scholar is suggested for academic subjects.
If you find a lack of sources, you've completed basic due diligence before nominating. However, if a quick search does find sources, this does not always mean an RfD on a sourcing basis is unwarranted. If you spend more time examining the sources, and determine that they are insufficient, e.g., because they only contain passing mention of the topic, then an RfD nomination may still be appropriate.
If you find that adequate sources do appear to exist, the fact that they are not yet present in the article is not a proper basis for a nomination. Instead, you should consider citing the sources, or at minimum apply an appropriate template to the page that flags the sourcing concern. Common templates include {{unreferenced}}, {{refimprove}}, {{third-party}}, {{primary sources}} and {{one source}}.

Discussed deletion

Put the deletion tag on the article.

Click "Change source" at the top of the page to be deleted.
In the edit box, add this tag: {{rfd|REASON}}. Put it at the top of the page, above the rest of the text. Then, replace the text "REASON" with a short reason why the page should be deleted. Do not be too specific here. You can add more details on the discussion page (see below).
- It is a good idea to write a change summary to let others know what you are doing. You can say "nominating for deletion", "requesting deletion", or something like that.
Click "Save changes" at the bottom to save the page with the deletion tag at the top.
- You can also check the "Watch this page" check box to add the page to your watchlist. This lets you know if the page for deletion has been changed. If the deletion tag is removed any time before the discussion is closed, it should be put back.

Create a discussion page.

If the deletion tag has been added to the page, a box should appear at the top of the article with a link saying "Click here to create a discussion page!" Click that link.
You should be taken to a page starting with "Creating Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/..." along with the current year and the name of the article to be deleted. In the edit box, the following tag should have already been added: {{RfD/Preload/Template}} . Replace the text PLACE REASON HERE with a more detailed reason why the page should be deleted.
- It is helpful to include links to the various policy pages about Wikipedia (that begin with Wikipedia:). Here are some examples of this: "This article is [[Wikipedia:COMPLEX|not easy to understand]]" or "Not a [[Wikipedia:notable|notable]] topic''. This will make others more aware of why the page is not acceptable under Wikipedia's policies.
Click "Save changes" to save the new discussion page when you are done.
- A change summary you can write for this page is "creating discussion page", "starting deletion discussion", or something like that.
- As with the page for deletion, you can check the "Watch the page" box. This will let you know if someone else has replied to your discussion.

List it here

Copy the title of the discussion page to the clipboard. You can do this by dragging the mouse over the text from "Wikipedia" to the end of the page title to highlight it, then right-clicking and selecting "Copy".
Go to the list of deletion requests, and click "change source" beside the words "Current deletion request discussions".
At the top of the list of discussions, paste the title from the clipboard (right-click and select "Paste"). Add a pair of curly brackets before and after the title to make a template that will copy the content of the discussion page onto the main deletion page, like this:
{{Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2026/(name of page to be deleted)}}
Finally, click "Save changes" to add the discussion to the list. If the page saves successfully, you should see your deletion discussion at the top of the list. And that's it!

If this is too complicated for you, there are some gadgets like Twinkle that you can use. This allows you to do it faster.

Quick deletion

If you think a page has nonsense content, add {{non}} to the top of the page.

If you think a page does not say why the subject is important, add {{notable}} to the top of the page.

If you think a page should be deleted per other quick deletion rules, add {{QD|reason}} to the top of the page.

Notifying the user

Generally, you should try to be civil and tell the user that created the page to join the discussion talking about the page. This can be done by adding {{subst:RFDNote|page to be deleted}} ~~~~ to the bottom of their talkpage.

Discussions

The discussion is not a vote. Please make suggestions on what action to take, and support your suggestion with reasons.
Please look at the article before you make a suggestion. Do not make an opinion using only the information given by the nominator. Looking at the history of the article may help to understand the situation.
Please read other comments and suggestions. They may have helpful information.
Start your comments or suggestions on a new line. Start with * and sign after your comment by adding ~~~~ to the end. If you are responding to another editor, put your comment directly below theirs and make sure your comment is indented (using more than one *).
New users can make suggestions, but their ideas may not be considered, especially if the suggestion seems to be made in bad faith. The opinion of users who had an account before the start of the request may be given more weight or importance.
Suggestions by users using "sock puppets" (more than one account belonging to the same person) will not be counted.
Please make only one suggestion. If you change your mind, change your first idea instead of adding a new one. The best way to do this is to put <s> before your old idea and </s> after it. For example, if you wanted to delete an article but now think it should be kept, you could put: "~~Delete~~ keep".
If you would like an article to be kept, you can improve the article and try to fix the problems given in the request for deletion. If the reasons given in the nomination are fixed by changing, the nomination can be withdrawn by the nominator, and the deletion discussion will be closed by an administrator.
Try to avoid confusing suggestions, such as delete and merge.
Requests for deletion is not a war zone. You can click here for more information, although the page is not in Simple English.

Remember: You do not have to make a suggestion for every nomination. You should think about not making a suggestion if:

A nomination involves a topic that you do not know much about.
Everyone has made the same suggestion and you agree with that suggestion.

All times are in UTC.

Current deletion request discussions

Marwanid campaigns of Edessa

Marwanid campaigns of Edessa (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Barras has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Doesn't seem to be notable per WP:GNG and en:WP:NEVENT Barras talk 10:48, 4 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 10:48, 11 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Marwanid offensive in Diyarbakir

Marwanid offensive in Diyarbakir (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Barras has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Doesn't seem to be a notable event per en:WP:NEVENT. Barras talk 10:47, 4 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 10:47, 11 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Persian Campaign (1224)

Persian Campaign (1224) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Notability for this event isn't established through reliable sources. One source is a Fandom wiki; the other is the English Wikipedia. CountryANDWestern (talk) 03:43, 4 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 03:43, 11 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

March to Khuzestan (1225)

March to Khuzestan (1225) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Notability for this military action isn't shown through reliable sources. One source is a bookseller's website. The other is a master's thesis. CountryANDWestern (talk) 03:42, 4 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 03:42, 11 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Burugapalli Shiva RamaKrishna

Burugapalli Shiva RamaKrishna (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable, recently recreated after a WP:SOFTDELETE RfD at Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2025/Burugapalli Shiva Rama Krishna. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 23:47, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

Delete - not notable per our guidelines. -Barras talk 10:50, 4 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
G5 would also apply here as the page has been created by a banned/blocked user. -Barras talk 11:03, 4 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 23:47, 10 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

UC-114 Sir Syed Town D Block

UC-114 Sir Syed Town D Block (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Barras has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Doesn't seem to be notable per WP:GNG. Barras talk 16:17, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 16:17, 10 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Sheikh Azam Yaseen

Sheikh Azam Yaseen (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Barras has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Seems to be failing WP:POLITICIAN. Barras talk 16:15, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 16:15, 10 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Mr. Gulua

Mr. Gulua (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 14:45, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 14:45, 10 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Susovan Roy

Susovan Roy (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Tanbiruzzaman has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Part of a Cross-wiki spam. The article topic or subject is not notable, little mentions in reliable sources. 🪶-TΛNBIRUZZΛMΛN (💬) 18:39, 2 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

I didn’t notice, this was actually previously deleted many times under the title Susovan Sonu Roy, also see previous rfd Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2021/Susovan Sonu Roy.🪶-TΛNBIRUZZΛMΛN (💬) 18:50, 2 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 18:39, 9 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Shyamkanu Mahanta

Shyamkanu Mahanta (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Barras has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Doesn't meet WP:GNG and no WP:SIGCOV. Barras talk 18:23, 2 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 18:23, 9 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Ayyubbid Conquest of Arabia

Ayyubbid Conquest of Arabia (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Significant coverage not shown to establish notability; in the sources I can access, there is passing mention but not sigcov. Like many Ayyubbid related articles, the verifiability is not there and the conflation of one sentence in a source to a bigger article is apparent. CountryANDWestern (talk) 14:12, 2 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

I understand the concern about standalone notability under WP:GNG. While the Ayyubid expansion into Yemen and the Hejaz is well documented in reliable secondary sources e.g. EI, Dumper, Daly & Petry it may not be treated by historians as a single, named campaign sufficient for a standalone article

I therefore support merging this content into an appropriate parent article such as Ayyubid dynasty History of Yemen or a dedicated section on Ayyubid expansion which would preserve verifiable material while avoiding synthesis concerns. ~2026-30149 (talk) 15:01, 2 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The article Ayyubid Conquest of Arabia was written based primarily on material already summarized in the “Ayyubid conquest of Arabia” subsection within the Ayyubid dynasty article on English Wikipedia, which itself draws on established secondary sources (e.g. Encyclopaedia of Islam, Daly & Petry, Dumper, etc.).

I understand the concern that this topic may not meet standalone notability requirements under WP:GNG, as historians generally discuss these events as part of broader Ayyubid expansion rather than as a formally named, discrete campaign.

In light of this, I support merging the content back into an appropriate parent article (such as Ayyubid dynasty or History of Yemen) rather than deletion, so that verifiable and sourced material is preserved without overstating the independence of the topic. ~2026-30149 (talk) 16:01, 2 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 14:12, 9 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Khwarazmian-Abbasid Conflict (1225)

Khwarazmian-Abbasid Conflict (1225) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Notability for this conflict not established through reliable sources. The only source provided appears to be a research paper. CountryANDWestern (talk) 14:11, 2 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 14:11, 9 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Template:User Tasmania

Template:User Tasmania (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unused userbox template existing in the wrong space per WP:Userboxes. I would move it to the userspace of its creator, but since it is unused other than at Category:Wikipedians in Tasmania, which is an empty cat, it's not worth the move. CountryANDWestern (talk) 12:48, 2 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

Delete Created for a single (invalid) purpose, discussed at User talk:Esteban McKeever/Archive 2#user page creation. No issues in recreating if needed but should ideally be in userspace. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 12:51, 2 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 12:48, 9 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Ramya Miryala

Ramya Miryala (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Barras has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Doesn't seem to meet WP:GNG and no WP:SIGCOV. Barras talk 10:12, 2 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

Delete - Don't see established notability here. CountryANDWestern (talk) 12:36, 2 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 10:12, 9 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Steve Rigby

Steve Rigby (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 21:59, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

Delete not a notable individual PieWriter (talk) 09:25, 2 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Not notable and based on the accounts involved, created via WP:UPE. CountryANDWestern (talk) 12:38, 2 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I'm sure a PR team could have written a more positive article, but not by much. The promotional aspects are this are so great that everything else is tainted. Delete and allow a good-faith editor to recreate in the future and perhaps we can better judge notability. Ravensfire (talk) 23:56, 2 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 21:59, 8 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Battle of Isfahan (1228)

Battle of Isfahan (1228) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Shadow. 547 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Renamed the article to the rightful name which is Siege of Isfahan (1228) so there isn’t any need of the Battle of Isfahan (1228) now Shadow. 547 (talk) 23:20, 28 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

Administrator note: added our RFD list at 13:06, 1 January 2026 (UTC). Barras talk 13:06, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on ~~23:20, 5 December 2025 (UTC)~~ 13:06, 8 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

TraceX Guard

TraceX Guard (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

D1551D3N7 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: lack of notability, promotional

The page does not exist to inform readers of a topic but merely to improve SEO of TraceX Labs or something.

Page keeps being recreated by sockpuppets. AfD for same page on English Wiki D1551D3N7 (talk) 12:41, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 12:41, 8 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Pou 3D

Pou 3D (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Passengerpigeon has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Based on a Google search, I don't think this game has enough notability independent of Pou, the first game in the series, to warrant its own page instead of a mention in that article, which is the case on the standard English Wikipedia. I tried converting it into a redirect but was reverted twice by the page creator. Passengerpigeon (talk) 01:32, 31 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 01:32, 7 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Battle of Gökçay (1511)

Battle of Gökçay (1511) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Barras has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Tagged as probably not notable for half a year already. I don't see how this battle is notable per our guidelines. Barras talk 17:21, 30 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 17:21, 6 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Template:Pp-pc

Template:Pp-pc (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Canadachick has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not needed, there is no pending changes protection here. Previously this was deleted without an RfD. Maybe it can be quick deleted again. canadachick (talk) 07:11, 30 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 07:11, 6 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

GAMMA (Global Association of MMA)

GAMMA (Global Association of MMA) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Tanbiruzzaman has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: There's no source in the article, and no explanation why the Association is notable, but there're lot of claims which must needs reliable sources. 🪶-TΛNBIRUZZΛMΛN (💬) 09:42, 29 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 09:42, 5 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Vittorio Morasso

Vittorio Morasso (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Passengerpigeon has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Partly AI-generated article written by the long-term cross-wiki vandal Alec Smithson about a non-notable architect. The claims of notability seem to be fabricated and most or all of the references likely are too. Passengerpigeon (talk) 15:00, 28 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

Delete - doesn't seem to be notable. -Barras talk 11:05, 4 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 15:00, 4 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Recently closed deletion discussions

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Barras talk 14:23, 4 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Masib Darasi

Battle of Masib Darasi (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Notability not shown for this battle through reliable sources. CountryANDWestern (talk) 12:37, 28 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

Delete Not a notable battle, with no significant coverage. PieWriter (talk) 01:46, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 12:37, 4 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. WP:SOFTDELETE --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 14:40, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The cat walks through the frozen Han river

The cat walks through the frozen Han river (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Fehufanga has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unsourced and can't find reliable coverage. Not a notable meme. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 06:05, 27 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 06:05, 3 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 14:38, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Dr Sunita Dube

Dr Sunita Dube (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

PieWriter has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails Wp:GNG. Not a notable person. PieWriter (talk) 01:45, 27 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

Delete Not notable, no reliable sources, no significant coverage.— *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 06:13, 27 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Sources are primary sources, interviews, bio blurbs or passing mentions. Nothing to show notability is met. Ravensfire (talk) 20:29, 27 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

~~Keep Keep~~ – The subject meets the General Notability Guideline through multiple independent, reliable, national-level secondary sources, not merely self-published material or routine announcements.

Dr Sunita Dube has received significant coverage in established mainstream media, including:

The Times of India – multiple authored opinion columns and expert features on public health, preventive medicine, and women’s health. Repeated bylined contributions demonstrate sustained editorial recognition rather than a single passing mention.
Express Healthcare – detailed reporting on her leadership role in the “Save the Girl Child from Womb to Tomb” campaign, including participation by the Governor of Maharashtra and the State Health Minister, establishing relevance at a public-policy level.
Coverage in other recognised outlets such as India Today, Healthcare Radius, and The Tribune, addressing healthcare advocacy, doctor safety, and public health initiatives.

These sources are independent, reliable, and nationally recognised, satisfying the requirements of WP:GNG. They are not limited to primary sources, routine biographies, or trivial mentions; several provide substantive discussion of her work and initiatives.

With respect to WP:BLP, the article is written in a neutral, factual tone, avoids promotional language, and attributes claims to reliable sources. Any remaining concerns regarding structure or sourcing are remediable through normal editorial improvement and do not justify deletion.

If editors believe further refinement is needed, policy-compliant alternatives to deletion exist per WP:ATD, including copyediting, trimming, or draftification. Deletion is not required where notability is demonstrably met and issues are fixable.

For these reasons, the article should be kept and improved rather than deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yàmla madarchod hai (talk • contribs) locked as a sock. Emk9 (talk) 22:06, 30 December 2025 (UTC) [reply]

~~Keep Keep~~ – The subject meets WP:GNG through multiple independent, reliable, national-level sources with sustained coverage.

Dr Sunita Dube has received coverage from established mainstream publications, including:

Entrepreneur (magazine) – author biography and professional profile.
The Times of India (Voices platform) – recurring bylined expert contributions, indicating editorial recognition beyond routine mention.
Indiatimes – profile identifying her as Chairperson of MedscapeIndia Aryan.
The Hans India – independent reporting on Medscape India Awards announced by Dr Dube at a national venue.
Healthshots – expert profile in a recognised health media outlet. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Watchingfilm75 (talk • contribs) locked as a sock. Emk9 (talk) 21:45, 30 December 2025 (UTC) [reply]

This request is due to close on 01:45, 3 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Ternera (talk) 01:23, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Showami

Showami (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 21:31, 26 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

Keep — Meets WP:GNG. Showami has significant coverage in multiple independent, reliable secondary sources already cited, including established business and real estate industry publications. The coverage discusses the company beyond routine announcements, satisfying WP:SIGCOV and WP:CORPDEPTH. Any remaining issues (tone, structure) are cleanup matters, not grounds for deletion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mark Rekon (talk • contribs)
Keep — Meets WP:GNG through multiple independent, reliable sources; cleanup issues are not grounds for deletion. 7Bonfire (talk) 19:27, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Globally locked account ^ PieWriter (talk) 01:03, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Sources are pretty obvious marketing fluff / paid articles, not truly independent sources. Not enough to show that WP:NCORP or WP:GNG has been met here. Ravensfire (talk) 02:45, 2 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 21:31, 2 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. WP:SOFTDELETE Ternera (talk) 20:55, 2 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hudhayfah al-Badri

Hudhayfah al-Badri (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Barras has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Suspected hoax: See Talk:Nuradin Rustamov (Creating on behalf of User:Tzafrir who tagged that article earlier this year. Barras talk 19:32, 26 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 19:32, 2 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. - FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 11:50, 2 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Eleven International Ltd.

Eleven International Ltd. (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Barras has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: After a quick search, this company doesn't seem to be notable. Barras talk 22:36, 25 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

Delete non-notable company PieWriter (talk) 02:41, 27 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 22:36, 1 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.