Wikipedia:Requests for deletion

If you think a page should be deleted, read the deletion policy to make sure.
Then follow these instructions on how to request a page for deletion. To find more information on what discussed deletions and quick deletions are:
PLEASE READ THIS

Before nominating: checks and alternatives

Prior to nominating article(s) for deletion, please be sure to:

A. Read and understand these policies and guidelines

1. The Wikipedia deletion policy, which explains valid grounds for deletion.
2. The main four guidelines and policies that inform deletion discussions: notability (WP:N), verifiability (WP:V), reliable sources (WP:RS), and what Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)
3. Subject-specific notability guidelines, which can be found at Category:Wikipedia notability guidelines

B. Carry out these checks

1. Confirm that the article does not meet the criteria for quick deletion.
2. If there are verifiability, notability or other sourcing concerns, take reasonable steps to search for reliable sources. (See step D.)
3. Review the article's history to check for potential vandalism or poor editing.
4. Read the article's talk page for previous nominations and/or that your objections haven't already been dealt with.
5. Check "What links here" in the article's sidebar, to see how the page is used and referenced within Wikipedia.
6. Check if there are interlanguage links, also in the sidebar, which may lead to more developed and better sourced articles. Likewise, search for native-language sources if the subject has a name in a non-Latin alphabet (such as Japanese or Greek), which is often in the lead.

C. Consider whether the article could be improved rather than deleted

1. If the article can be fixed through normal editing, then it is not a candidate for RfD.
2. If the article was recently created, please consider allowing the contributors more time to develop the article.
3. If an article has issues try first raising your concerns on the article's talk page, with the main contributors, and/or adding a cleanup tag, such as {{notability}}, {{hoax}}, {{original research}}, or {{advert}}; this ensures readers are aware of the problem and may act to fix it.
4. If the topic is not important enough to merit an article on its own, consider merging or redirecting to an existing article. This should be done particularly if the topic name is a likely search term.

D. Search for additional sources, if the main concern is notability

1. The minimum search expected is a normal Google search, a Google Books search, a Google News search, and a Google News archive search; Google Scholar is suggested for academic subjects.
2. If you find a lack of sources, you've completed basic due diligence before nominating. However, if a quick search does find sources, this does not always mean an RfD on a sourcing basis is unwarranted. If you spend more time examining the sources, and determine that they are insufficient, e.g., because they only contain passing mention of the topic, then an RfD nomination may still be appropriate.
3. If you find that adequate sources do appear to exist, the fact that they are not yet present in the article is not a proper basis for a nomination. Instead, you should consider citing the sources, or at minimum apply an appropriate template to the page that flags the sourcing concern. Common templates include {{unreferenced}}, {{refimprove}}, {{third-party}}, {{primary sources}} and {{one source}}.

Discussed deletion

Put the deletion tag on the article.

1. Click "Change source" at the top of the page to be deleted.
2. In the edit box, add this tag: {{rfd|REASON}}. Put it at the top of the page, above the rest of the text. Then, replace the text "REASON" with a short reason why the page should be deleted. Do not be too specific here. You can add more details on the discussion page (see below).
   • It is a good idea to write a change summary to let others know what you are doing. You can say "nominating for deletion", "requesting deletion", or something like that.
3. Click "Save changes" at the bottom to save the page with the deletion tag at the top.
   • You can also check the "Watch this page" check box to add the page to your watchlist. This lets you know if the page for deletion has been changed. If the deletion tag is removed any time before the discussion is closed, it should be put back.

Create a discussion page.

1. If the deletion tag has been added to the page, a box should appear at the top of the article with a link saying "Click here to create a discussion page!" Click that link.
2. You should be taken to a page starting with "Creating Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/..." along with the current year and the name of the article to be deleted. In the edit box, the following tag should have already been added: {{RfD/Preload/Template}} . Replace the text PLACE REASON HERE with a more detailed reason why the page should be deleted.
   • It is helpful to include links to the various policy pages about Wikipedia (that begin with Wikipedia:). Here are some examples of this: "This article is [[Wikipedia:COMPLEX|not easy to understand]]" or "Not a [[Wikipedia:notable|notable]] topic''. This will make others more aware of why the page is not acceptable under Wikipedia's policies.
3. Click "Save changes" to save the new discussion page when you are done.
   • A change summary you can write for this page is "creating discussion page", "starting deletion discussion", or something like that.
   • As with the page for deletion, you can check the "Watch the page" box. This will let you know if someone else has replied to your discussion.

List it here

1. Copy the title of the discussion page to the clipboard. You can do this by dragging the mouse over the text from "Wikipedia" to the end of the page title to highlight it, then right-clicking and selecting "Copy".
2. Go to the list of deletion requests, and click "change source" beside the words "Current deletion request discussions".
3. At the top of the list of discussions, paste the title from the clipboard (right-click and select "Paste"). Add a pair of curly brackets before and after the title to make a template that will copy the content of the discussion page onto the main deletion page, like this:

   {{Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2026/(name of page to be deleted)}}

4. Finally, click "Save changes" to add the discussion to the list. If the page saves successfully, you should see your deletion discussion at the top of the list. And that's it!

If this is too complicated for you, there are some gadgets like Twinkle that you can use. This allows you to do it faster.

Quick deletion

See also: Wikipedia:Deletion policy § Quick deletion

If you think a page has nonsense content, add {{non}} to the top of the page.

If you think a page does not say why the subject is important, add {{notable}} to the top of the page.

If you think a page should be deleted per other quick deletion rules, add {{QD|reason}} to the top of the page.

Notifying the user

Generally, you should try to be civil and tell the user that created the page to join the discussion talking about the page. This can be done by adding {{subst:RFDNote|page to be deleted}} ~~~~ to the bottom of their talkpage.

Discussions

See also: Wikipedia:Deletion review

• The discussion is not a vote. Please make suggestions on what action to take, and support your suggestion with reasons.
• Please look at the article before you make a suggestion. Do not make an opinion using only the information given by the nominator. Looking at the history of the article may help to understand the situation.
• Please read other comments and suggestions. They may have helpful information.
• Start your comments or suggestions on a new line. Start with * and sign after your comment by adding ~~~~ to the end. If you are responding to another editor, put your comment directly below theirs and make sure your comment is indented (using more than one *).
• New users can make suggestions, but their ideas may not be considered, especially if the suggestion seems to be made in bad faith. The opinion of users who had an account before the start of the request may be given more weight or importance.
• Suggestions by users using "sock puppets" (more than one account belonging to the same person) will not be counted.
• Please make only one suggestion. If you change your mind, change your first idea instead of adding a new one. The best way to do this is to put <s> before your old idea and </s> after it. For example, if you wanted to delete an article but now think it should be kept, you could put: "Delete keep".
• If you would like an article to be kept, you can improve the article and try to fix the problems given in the request for deletion. If the reasons given in the nomination are fixed by changing, the nomination can be withdrawn by the nominator, and the deletion discussion will be closed by an administrator.
• Try to avoid confusing suggestions, such as delete and merge.
• Requests for deletion is not a war zone. You can click here for more information, although the page is not in Simple English.

Remember: You do not have to make a suggestion for every nomination. You should think about not making a suggestion if:

1. A nomination involves a topic that you do not know much about.
2. Everyone has made the same suggestion and you agree with that suggestion.

• All times are in UTC.

Current deletion request discussions

Westfalia Fruit

Westfalia Fruit (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Passengerpigeon has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This article is written in promotional-sounding nonsimplified English and is about a company that I am not sure meets our notability requirements; all Google news hits are either blatantly press releases or in industry-specific journals. I am bringing it to RFD instead of speedying it because it isn't blatantly non-notable or spammy and doesn't contain long passages of complex English. Passengerpigeon (talk) 04:07, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 04:07, 18 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Siege of Erbil (1310)

Siege of Erbil (1310) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Barras has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: The article doesn't state why the siege is notable at all. Fails en:WP:NEVENT. Barras talk 21:31, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 21:31, 17 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Polyanorus

Polyanorus (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not a notable micronation. No coverage provided or found. CountryANDWestern (talk) 13:24, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 13:24, 17 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Daiji Nii

Daiji Nii (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG. No appearances from what I can see. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 22:36, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 22:36, 16 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Yosuke Niwa

Yosuke Niwa (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG. No appearances from what I can see. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 22:34, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 22:34, 16 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Yusuke Sato (born in 1982)

Yusuke Sato (born in 1982) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 22:33, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 22:33, 16 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Hirotada Ito

Hirotada Ito (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 22:32, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 22:32, 16 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Koichi Hirono

Koichi Hirono (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG. Also see w:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Koichi Hirono. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 22:31, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 22:31, 16 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Shinji Suzuki

Shinji Suzuki (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG, seemingly no appearances, essentially A4 and only wanting to go through RfD as a PROD-style process given the age of these articles. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 22:29, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 22:29, 16 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Shun Ichimura

Shun Ichimura (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 22:28, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 22:28, 16 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Embu (footballer)

Embu (footballer) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG, also see w:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Embu (footballer). --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 22:27, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 22:27, 16 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Seiji Kubo

Seiji Kubo (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 22:24, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 22:24, 16 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Kazuya Matsuda

Kazuya Matsuda (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG. Also see w:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kazuya Matsuda. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 22:24, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 22:24, 16 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Kaoru Asano

Kaoru Asano (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG. Also see w:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kaoru Asano. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 22:23, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 22:23, 16 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Shigeru Sarusawa

Shigeru Sarusawa (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG, seemingly no appearances, essentially A4 and only wanting to go through RfD as a PROD-style process given the age of these articles. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 22:20, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 22:20, 16 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Tsuyoshi Kawaguchi

Tsuyoshi Kawaguchi (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail WP:GNG. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 22:15, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 22:15, 16 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Junya Kimura

Junya Kimura (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG, seemingly no appearances, essentially A4 and only wanting to go through RfD as a PROD-style process given the age of these articles. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 22:15, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 22:15, 16 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Kengo Takushima

Kengo Takushima (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG, does not appear to have played professionally. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 22:13, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 22:13, 16 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Tadaomi Yasuda

Tadaomi Yasuda (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG, does not appear to have played professionally. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 22:12, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 22:12, 16 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Mitsunori Izutani

Mitsunori Izutani (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 22:12, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 22:12, 16 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Koichi Kawai

Koichi Kawai (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 22:11, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 22:11, 16 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Ryuta Matsushima

Ryuta Matsushima (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG, seemingly no appearances, essentially A4 and only wanting to go through RfD as a PROD-style process given the age of these articles. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 22:05, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 22:05, 16 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Anil Nayak

Anil Nayak (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Barras has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Already deleted multiple times. The article has also been deleted on enwiki. Not notable. Barras talk 21:02, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 21:02, 16 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Sheikh Muhammad Yaseen

Sheikh Muhammad Yaseen (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ravensfire has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Does not meet WP:POLITICIAN, office is not statewide and the source is minimal. Ravensfire (talk) 18:49, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete - Not notable per NPOL. -Barras talk 21:09, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 18:49, 16 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Noritomo Harada

Noritomo Harada (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG, seemingly no appearances, essentially A4 and only wanting to go through RfD as a PROD-style process given the age of these articles. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 16:41, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 16:41, 16 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Kazuhiro Ninomiya

Kazuhiro Ninomiya (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG, all coverage appears to relate to the judoka with the same name. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 16:40, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 16:40, 16 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Hisanori Ogawa

Hisanori Ogawa (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG, seemingly no appearances, essentially A4 and only wanting to go through RfD as a PROD-style process given the age of these articles. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 16:39, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 16:39, 16 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Kentaro Yano

Kentaro Yano (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG, seemingly no appearances, essentially A4 and only wanting to go through RfD as a PROD-style process given the age of these articles. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 16:39, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 16:39, 16 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Norita Ochiai

Norita Ochiai (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG, seemingly no appearances, essentially A4 and only wanting to go through RfD as a PROD-style process given the age of these articles. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 16:38, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 16:38, 16 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Takahide Kishi

Takahide Kishi (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG, also see w:en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Takahide Kishi. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 16:35, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 16:35, 16 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Idegu Ojonugwa Shadrach

Idegu Ojonugwa Shadrach (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Notability is not established through reliable sources. Some sources are self-published or things he's written. Others seem to suffer from concerns with sources from Nigeria. CountryANDWestern (talk) 14:28, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 14:28, 16 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

POLYAS

POLYAS (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Notability isn't established by reliable sources. Most of the sources here are press releases or information in directories about the company. CountryANDWestern (talk) 13:47, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete not notable. Fails GNG and NCORP. -Barras talk 11:20, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 13:47, 16 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Level Frames (platform)

Level Frames (platform) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

PieWriter has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: non-notable company PieWriter (talk) 09:45, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 09:45, 16 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Brian Zhan

Brian Zhan (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Barras has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG. Barras talk 23:44, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 23:44, 15 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Babasoji Oyebanji Maurice-Diya

Babasoji Oyebanji Maurice-Diya (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Barras has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG. No WP:SIGCOV. Barras talk 23:40, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 23:40, 15 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

List of Android antivirus software

List of Android antivirus software (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Barras has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Pretty much a copy of enwiki's draft. Wikipedia is not a guidebook. Barras talk 23:38, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 23:38, 15 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Rap Goddess

Rap Goddess (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Barras has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Sources are all blatant-paid promotion. Not notable. No significant coverage. enwiki draft has also been declined. Barras talk 23:17, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 23:17, 15 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Fall of Pala Empire

Fall of Pala Empire (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Barras has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Doubtable notability. The falling of that empire doesn't seem very notable. Poorly written, pretty much one source only. I'm not sure if it's even worth merging it into Pala Empire. Barras talk 23:06, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 23:06, 15 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Мета Dialectic

Мета Dialectic (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Barras has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Doesn't seem to be notable. Page has one source who seems to be the inventor of this. On ru-wiki a similiar page has been deleted per "no proof of encyclopaedic relevancy". Barras talk 22:51, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Definitely should be expanded.— Preceding unsigned comment added by ~2026-16976-4 (talk • contribs) 01:40, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
• keep it. It works well for marginal pages on terminology. Нео-Марксист (talk) 09:34, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
•  Delete I should get this out first: There is no reason for the title of the article to be in Cyrillic. In the event that it is kept, it should be moved to the romanization.

Now with that out of the way.

I cannot express just how confusing it was reading this article. There is no way the intended readers of the Simple English Wikipedia can understand any of this. No effort was shown to simplify the contents into something barely understandable to the average reader. The Simple English Wikipedia's primary mission is to be a free encyclopedia that uses Simple English. This article is clearly not simple at all. Definitely should be expanded is an absurd thought and almost made me laugh.

Sources in the article are terrible at establishing the notability of this topic. None of them are independent as they were written by the inventor. Notability can only be established by independent sources. Not to mention that having all primary sources is a nightmare for verifiability. Delete.— *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 09:45, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

Metaphysics is a major branch of philosophy. It concerns existence and the nature of things that exist. Author (and Janev is not the only one with respect to subject) has explained Meta-dialectics in most simple way.~2026-18516-5 (talk) 17:17, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

Then why do I still see non-simple words that could be replaced with simple words, and why are there so many compound sentences when Simple English favors simple sentence structures? — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 23:17, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

Non-simple word is for example Nothngness, and in Metaphysics scientists/philosophers still ask themselfs how everthing above that (presumed ''minimum'') exists (such as "somethnig" or Everything else than the nothing). Well the term "nothing" in itself is not in Meta-dialectic" a simple word or term, since it is a construction of negation "No" and a "thing" (i.e. "No-thing"), which in logic and mathematics represent an aditional "operation" (not absence of anything), and therefore a term or category of "Nothngness" (assumed by philosphers) to be natural state (or ''minimum'') when we stop to ask "Why sometnig more" is not autonomus itself, but rather an operational (and an ''operation'', per se, is more than "Nothngness"). In conclusion even word "No-thngness" is not a simple word, but reather ''relational '' (i.e. in relation to something), since in itself "nothing" contains an operation of a ''negation ''.~2026-19963-3 (talk) 10:42, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

Non-simple word is for example Nothngness, and in Metaphysics scientists/philosophers still ask themselfs how everthing above that (presumed ''minimum'') exists (such as "somethnig" or Everything else than the nothing). Well the term "nothing" in itself is not in Meta-dialectic" a simple word or term, since it is a construction of negation "No" and a "thing" (i.e. "No-thing"), which in logic and mathematics represent an aditional "operation" (not absence of anything), and therefore a term or category of "Nothngness" assumed (by philosphers) to be natural state (or ''minimum'') when we stop to ask "Why sometnig more" is not autonomus itself, but rather an operational (and an ''operation'', per se, is more than "Nothngness"). In conclusion even word "No-thngness" is not a simple word, but reather ''relational '' (i.e. in relation to something), since in itself "nothing" contains an operation of a ''negation ''.~2026-19963-3 (talk) 10:50, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 22:51, 15 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

IndusInd Bank

IndusInd Bank (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ravensfire has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Nothing here that shows WP:NCORP is met. Routine coverage, database type sources and primary sources. Ravensfire (talk) 18:50, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 18:50, 15 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Hidenori Tabata

Hidenori Tabata (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 16:47, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 16:47, 15 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Masayuki Mita

Masayuki Mita (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 16:47, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 16:47, 15 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Sho Okubo

Sho Okubo (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 16:46, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 16:46, 15 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Yohei Hamasaki

Yohei Hamasaki (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 16:45, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 16:45, 15 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Shota Iwata

Shota Iwata (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 16:45, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 16:45, 15 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Jin Kanaoya

Jin Kanaoya (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 16:44, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 16:44, 15 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Jun Shimanuki

Jun Shimanuki (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 16:44, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 16:44, 15 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Yosuke Kawamata

Yosuke Kawamata (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 16:42, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 16:42, 15 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Takaaki Hisadome

Takaaki Hisadome (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 16:35, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 16:35, 15 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Koichi Higashi

Koichi Higashi (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG. Also see w:en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Koichi Higashi. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 16:35, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 16:35, 15 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Takahiro Ishikawa

Takahiro Ishikawa (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 16:34, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 16:34, 15 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Hidekazu Orita

Hidekazu Orita (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG. Could be an A4, going through slower deletion purely out of leniency for its age, a quick closure would be reasonable. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 16:34, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 16:34, 15 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Yoshihiro Saisho

Yoshihiro Saisho (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 16:33, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 16:33, 15 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Wataru Tagami

Wataru Tagami (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 16:33, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 16:33, 15 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Hidekazu Tajiri

Hidekazu Tajiri (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG. Could be an A4, going through slower deletion purely out of leniency for its age, a quick closure would be reasonable. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 16:32, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 16:32, 15 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Toshikazu Kato

Toshikazu Kato (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 16:30, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 16:30, 15 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

All of the sources indeed talk and mention about Hesine haweri

Hesine Haweri

Hesine Haweri (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Notability is not shown through significant coverage in reliable sources.

Source 1 - I can't access but it's only used to prove that he's existed based on it linking after the opening sentence here.

Source 2 - He is only mentioned in one sentence ("One of the most famous members of the tribe is the legendary Hesin Şeref Îsa Mahmûd")

Source 3 - Cannot access this source

Source 4 - Doesn't seem to be related at all? There's no mention of him, only another person, plus it's a wiki anyway.

Source 5 - He is mentioned in one paragraph.

None of this shows significant coverage in reliable sources. CountryANDWestern (talk) 17:55, 7 January 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Hesine haweri's military carrier was his victory over the Prince of Soran, and he was known for hunting animals and for defending his territories. I see no issue besides the fact that you’re not able to access the source, which is weird. I’ll try it myself, but this is outrageous. The fact that you’ve gone to multiple yazidis pages and nominated them for deletion sounds pretty racist Yazidilover (talk) 18:13, 7 January 2026 (UTC)

One is about hassan agha (real name) being named in storys.

Two also is meant that was mentioned by people

three is a book ive read in a bibiliothek mentioning his personality

four litteraly says hassn agha and his whole life

5 litteraly says on german what he has defended Derabun

This is the 3rd time your trying to delete our pages. Please stop Hesinaezidxan (talk) 18:13, 7 January 2026 (UTC)

The first one talks about him being mentioned amongst Heweri under the Heros "I found that there was a considerable amount of

consistency between informants on which themes of stran were particularly

important. Derweshe 'Evdf, Ifisene 'Elke and Ezdf Mfrza were mentioned

everywhere; Hesen Hawerf was mentioned wherever there were members of

the Hawed tribe,"

The Second one talks about how important Hesin Şeref Îsa Mahmûd is. and i only used it on his existence or importancy.

The Third one is online and talks about the Battle in the Derabun Region and Hesine Haweris personality itself

The Wiki contains sources itself and its not the Wiki we know where we can just edit it. Its made by the creators itself.

The fifth one litteraly talks about "Hesin Şeref Îsa Mahmûd Hewerî" and the his accomplishment against MIr muahmmed rawanduzi. "Kämpfte gegen den muslimischen Emir Rawandouz, der mehr als 100.000 Êzîden massakrieren ließ. Er wehrte einen erneuten Vernichtungsfeldzug gegen die Êzîden ab. Er bewahrte den Sufî Khalaf vor dem Tod durch den regionalen Beg, dieser widmete ihm ein Lied welches bis heute berühmt ist." Hesinaezidxan (talk) 19:17, 7 January 2026 (UTC)

As I explained above, simply being mentioned isn't showing significant coverage. One source talks about him in one sentence; another in one paragraph. That's not significant coverage. Another is a wiki. A wiki is not a reliable source. We need significant coverage in reliable sources to prove notability and that's not being shown here. CountryANDWestern (talk) 20:05, 7 January 2026 (UTC)

This is a biography. 2 non Wiki sources talk about him and his life. The books were only posted on that Wiki. Besides that Biographys often times dont need academic sources . Hesinaezidxan (talk) 20:13, 7 January 2026 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 17:55, 14 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Massacre of Janissaries in Mosul

Massacre of Janissaries in Mosul (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Notability for this event is not shown in reliable sources. The two sources are essentially the same. They both focus on Mirza but do not focus in much depth on the event that is the topic of this article. One of the sources is "The French Wikisource on Mythologies, Myths, Legends and Religions" which would not make it a reliable source as a wiki. CountryANDWestern (talk) 16:20, 7 January 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Ezidi mirza was known for this act since it’s symbolic that he took revenge against the people who killed his brothers when he was just a child. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yazidilover (talk • contribs)

• Yazidis in general have not much Sources online. 2 sources for that topic is good. You can not expect academic university sources about such topics. And by the way, i saw you also try to delete other pages that were Yazidi. This strongly shows that this deletion is not based on trying to maek wiki better but to harm yazidis online. Hesinaezidxan (talk) 16:43, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
  • Wikipedia relies on significant coverage of topics. Two websites which are almost identical in their language don't make for significant coverage. Accusing me of bias is also inappropriate and could be taken as a personal attack. I nominated multiple pages because as I looked into one article, it led me to another. CountryANDWestern (talk) 17:26, 7 January 2026 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 16:20, 14 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Battle of Rawanduz (1836)

Battle of Rawanduz (1836) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Notability for this battle isn't shown through significant coverage in relaible sources. Only one source is provided and its inclusion in there does not establish this as a notable event. CountryANDWestern (talk) 16:11, 7 January 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Weak delete - Single source, no page numbers. On Google books, a search for Rawanduz turned up two hits, both from maps. Ravensfire (talk) 01:05, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 16:11, 14 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Pedro Pablo Muñoz Oses

Pedro Pablo Muñoz Oses (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Doesn't seem overly notable. The bulk of the sources are all dealing with the arrest and seem to be routine coverage of a local politician being arrested. The article is completely unbalanced with only a couple of paragraphs NOT focused on scandals/arrests. It also appears tobe a machine translation from the Es. article. CountryANDWestern (talk) 15:51, 7 January 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Pedro Pablo Muñoz Oses is the mayor of Colbún, Chilean Wiki 293929 (talk) 19:25, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
  • That doesn't make him notable, though. CountryANDWestern (talk) 20:02, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
•  Delete - not notable per NPOL. -Barras talk 21:10, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 15:51, 14 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Defense at Derabun

Defense at Derabun (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Notability for this event is not shown through significant coverage in reliable sources. Many of the sources come from Kurdipedia which does not seem to be a reliable, neutral source. The al-Dakhi book cannot be located with the ISBN that is provided; the only results come back to three uses in Simple Wikipedia. The "Chronical of Heroes" book that is the first source appears to be a selected summary of another book and doesn't appear to be totally reliable. CountryANDWestern (talk) 13:40, 7 January 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• This page should not be deleted, because the sources all claim the same thing, showing that it is most likely real. Many other pages also have these kind of Sources. This deletion is most likely because of Anti Yazidi sentiment. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hesinaezidxan (talk • contribs)
  • "Real" and notable are two different things. This event may have happened, but it's not shown to be notable enough through reliable sources. CountryANDWestern (talk) 15:14, 7 January 2026 (UTC)

  It has multiple books and several other websites. You also claim that it happpened. Its not necessary to delete it. Hesinaezidxan (talk) 15:25, 7 January 2026 (UTC)

  I agree with @Hesinaezidxan since the page is also brand new it shouldn’t be deleted the page has good sources and neutral writing it shouldn’t be deleted. Yazidilover (talk) 15:29, 7 January 2026 (UTC)

  Whether or not a page is new does not impact whether or not it should be deleted. Once pages are published in the main space, they shoudl be meeting Wikipedia standards, not treated as drafts. CountryANDWestern (talk) 17:31, 7 January 2026 (UTC)

  It is written Simple and has multiple Sources, which is unusual for this Topic. Many other Pages like Uprising of Bitlis litterlay have one singular source and its still up and even protected. Hesinaezidxan (talk) 19:19, 7 January 2026 (UTC)

  @Barras Id like to inform you that this user also added Deletion nominations on other Yezidi Pages, which also had poor and unjustified Reasons. This suggests that it may have been Yezidi targetted Hesinaezidxan (talk) 19:26, 7 January 2026 (UTC)

• The page is good the Deletion is unnecessary the page was just created a few hours ago and it’s neutral and has good and reliable sources what else’s would you need for a simple wiki page? There are pages with almost zero sources and they exist yet this page which is good and has reliable sources is nominated for deletion? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yazidilover (talk • contribs) 15:16, 7 January 2026 (UTC)

  Also to consider, the person nominating this also wanted to delete another Yazidi related page, that also was speaking forr Yazidi people. This shows that this person is just trying to find any reason to delete and harm Yazidis online. Hesinaezidxan (talk) 16:42, 7 January 2026 (UTC)

  @CountryANDWestern Lets do this fairly. We can remove the Yazidi uprising of Ali begs wife and move the page to drafts and make it better. There is no need to delete this as it already has multiple sources. Hesinaezidxan (talk) 16:59, 7 January 2026 (UTC)

  And also, the ISBN exists. At this point you are just searching a way to delete this Hesinaezidxan (talk) 17:07, 7 January 2026 (UTC)

  The Sources used seem reliable. Those Books are from German scientific Publishers, which is unusual and hard to find when it comes to the Yazidi People. It has 7 Sources from which 3 are Books covering this Topic. Also there are plenty of other Pages with one singular weak source that are still up with extended protection. I ask for the deletion to be reconsidered, as i put much effort on making this page and finding those Sources @Barras Hesinaezidxan (talk) 13:00, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

  The first source doesn't even give any information about the event at all. -Barras talk 13:10, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

  It litteraly does. View Page 9 Hesinaezidxan (talk) 13:36, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

  It mentions only fights against a Muslim emir. It doesn't make clear that this is about Derabun. -Barras talk 13:41, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

  He talks about the Kurdish Emir. It mentions the victory, which i cited. He saved the Suvi Khalaf. Hesine haweri in every other source was in Derabun. Hesinaezidxan (talk) 13:54, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

  If a source requires another source to obtain an image of the topic, it is not a reliable one. It could as well be about any other, probably not notable battle. -Barras talk 13:57, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

  See en:WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Just because other articles exist that have fewer sources doesn't mean this article should be kept. If those pages need to be deleted, then you can certainly nominate them for deletion. CountryANDWestern (talk) 13:18, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

  We cant because they are extended protected Hesinaezidxan (talk) 13:35, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

  Who is we? CountryANDWestern (talk) 13:37, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

  I mean in general Hesinaezidxan (talk) 13:52, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

  I am not aware of any articles on Simple English Wikipedia that require extended confirmed status to edit or nominate for deletion. CountryANDWestern (talk) 13:55, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

  You can’t edit it. How can I nominate it for deletion if I can’t even edit it Hesinaezidxan (talk) 16:03, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

  Please link to an article on Simple English Wikipedia that requires you to be extended confirmed and that you would like to nominate for deletion as I don’t know any that require it CountryANDWestern (talk) 16:14, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

  Never Mind it was a normal English Page Hesinaezidxan (talk) 17:55, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

•  Delete - I don't see the notability here. The sources are, as stated by CAW, rather weak and don't seem to be reliable. Without significant coverage I don't think this can be kept. -Barras talk 21:22, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 13:40, 14 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Hamish Sutherland

Hamish Sutherland (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Notability isn't shown through reliable sources; sources are spam looking and likely paid placement. Overall, doesn't seem like there's anything notable about this individual regardless of sources CountryANDWestern (talk) 17:57, 6 January 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Clearly promotional in nature - using multiple copies of the same press release as sources (and noted very obviously as press releases) demonstrates that very clearly. Not notable. Ravensfire (talk) 18:34, 6 January 2026 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 17:57, 13 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Rūḥ

Rūḥ (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

The Sophocrat has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No sources and dubious quality. Sophocrat (talk) 23:12, 5 January 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 23:12, 12 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Quinten Delaere

Quinten Delaere (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Does not seem to be notable; the 'record' isn't too notable of an achievement and the coverage seems to point this as a "notable for one event" submission. CountryANDWestern (talk) 19:47, 5 January 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete No clear notability and no significant coverage in independent reliable sources. --Saroj (talk) 05:52, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
• Keep - The subject meets the notability criteria because this is not just a "gameplay record" but a documented case of fraud detection in a major gaming community, validated by Guinness World Records.

  Regarding the sources:

  1. Meristation (Diario AS) is a major international Spanish tech/gaming publication, not a local blog. It provides significant coverage of the technical investigation.
  2. Guinness World Records explicitly validated the technical dossier, separating this from a standard speedrun.
  3. The event has received coverage in multiple national/regional Belgian media outlets (KW, Focus-WTV).

  While the subject is currently known for this event, the depth of the coverage (discussing the technical data analysis and exposure of scripts) goes beyond a trivial mention. I suggest keeping the article as the fraud investigation itself is notable. ~2026-10937-2 (talk) 08:32, 6 January 2026 (UTC)

•  Keep I have completely rewritten the article to address the concerns raised by @Saroj: and @CountryANDWestern:. The previous version lacked sources, but the new version now cites 12 independent, international sources. This demonstrates significant coverage beyond a "one-time event". The coverage comes from major technology and gaming authorities, including:

  Kotaku (International/USA)

  PCGamesN (UK/International)

  PC Games (Germany)

  Meristation / Diario AS (Spain - Major national newspaper)

  GameWave (France)

The article now focuses strictly on the facts of the investigation and fraud detection, which was the subject of this media attention. I believe the notability criteria are now fully met. Please review the current version. Tefepit (talk) 16:18, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 19:47, 12 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Dmitry Volkov (entrepreneur)

Dmitry Volkov (entrepreneur) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ternera has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not encyclopedic, maybe an attack page. Ternera (talk) 17:58, 5 January 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Delete -- Appears to be a notable subject, but this is a w:WP:TNT situation. Too much unbalanced coverage for a BLP and doesn't look like it's salvageable with its current history. CountryANDWestern (talk) 18:03, 5 January 2026 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 17:58, 12 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

René-Josué Valin

René-Josué Valin (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Does not appear to be notable. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 02:04, 5 January 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 02:04, 12 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Lawrence Isaiah Morris

Lawrence Isaiah Morris (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 01:26, 5 January 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Not notable, no significant coverage from reliable sources — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 10:03, 7 January 2026 (UTC)

  Lawrence Isaiah Morris has a best-selling book (sited and sourced by multiple publications on his website, https://www.lawrenceimorris.com).

  He has won 3 awards from 3 different book authorities ('2025 Best New Author in the United States' by Evergreen Awards (https://evergreenawards.com/awards/lawrence-i-morris-best-new-author-in-the-united-states-of-2025) '2025 American Writing Awards Finalist' by the American Writing Awards (A World Connected Within the Bounds of Interpretation - 2025 American Writing Awards Finalist), and is '2025 International Impact Awards Winner', Lawrence Morris Wins International Impact Book Award - Artist Highlight).

  Further, Lawrence Isaiah Morris has an influencer level following on Instagram, more than 150k followers (https://www.instagram.com/lawisaiah).

  Lawrence Isaiah Morris' best-selling book has been reviewed by the book industry's leading 3rd party independent review firm, Kirkus Reviews (https://www.kirkusreviews.com/book-reviews/lawrence-i-morris/a-world-connected-within-the-bounds-of-interpretation)

  He's also been featured in the NYTimes, Barchart, AP, and hundreds of other leading news publications.

  Lawrence Isaiah Morris's 'unified theory of belief' postulate is groundbreaking and novel, the foundation of which is presented in his best-selling book A World Connected Within the Bounds of Interpretation (https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/unified-theory-belief-lawrence-i-morris-bse-mba-lawrence-i-morris-ktige).

  By virtue of exceptional, unique, and novel impact to society & academia, with said impact being sited and sourced by several independent publications, review governing bodies, awards committees, and the general public, Lawrence Isaiah Morris far exceeds the noted Wikipedia requirements for being considered a 'notable figure'.

  If anything, this article needs to be updated to reflect his full body of work and notability. ~2026-15611-6 (talk) 14:51, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

• Delete - The awards he's won are "nominate yourself and pay the fee and we'll give you an award" things. His review on Kirkus is also purchased in the "indie review" category ("By purchasing a Kirkus indie review, authors can have the opportunity to build some name recognition..."). Nothing here is a reliable source that shows his notability. CountryANDWestern (talk) 14:59, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 01:26, 12 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Class reunion (2019 film)

Class reunion (2019 film) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail WP:MOVIE. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 00:43, 5 January 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Not a notable movie. No significant coverage. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 10:17, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
•  Keep I pulled a couple of sources from the German version that look to have significant coverage - , , plus which looked like a good source but couldn't get past the subscriber wall. Still, enough for me to say Keep. Ravensfire (talk) 20:19, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

  If kept, please capitalize the R in reunion in line with article title norms. Thank you! Ravensfire (talk) 20:22, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

  Thank you Ravensfire, these sources seem good to me. I was only able to access two of the sources but they certainly are independent and cover the subject in detail. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 22:18, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 00:43, 12 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Pakistan at the 2018 Winter Paralympics

Pakistan at the 2018 Winter Paralympics (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Hiàn has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Pakistan did not actually compete at the 2018 Winter Paralympics. All sources speak of aspirations to compete in the games, not an actual athlete registered to compete. The exception is the "Disabled Sports USA" profile, but the exact language also implies an aspiration. Hiàn 19:11, 4 January 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• That is interesting, because her name appears in few sources on the internet. were written after the 2018 Paralympics, but maybe they didn't actually verify their facts. The third one says "She was also nominated to represent Pakistan in ParaWinterGames, which was Pakistan’s first ever participation in such event" - so it does say Pakistan participated, but it doesn't actually make it clear if she participated in the event. canadachick (talk) 19:15, 4 January 2026 (UTC)

  I think it's likely they didn't verify their facts properly. Her Paralympic profile is empty (implies no participation), but that necessarily begs the question of why she has a profile to begin with. See also the enwiki page on the 2018 Winter Paralympics and Pakistan at the Paralympics, both of which suggest Pakistan hasn't participated in a single Winter Paralympics. Hiàn 19:23, 4 January 2026 (UTC)

  Yes I think something would be listed there if she had competed. In that case, delete. canadachick (talk) 19:27, 4 January 2026 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 19:11, 11 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Narges Shahbazi

Narges Shahbazi (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Raayaan9911 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG not notable Raayaan9911 18:24, 4 January 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 18:24, 11 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Prof. O. Favour Ayodele

Prof. O. Favour Ayodele (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 17:42, 4 January 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete No significant coverage, no reliable sources, no sources for the awards.— *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 09:48, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
• Very poor writing style. Also Prof(essor) is an academic title awarded by a higher education institute and likely not part of the name. What the heck is a PhD in counseling, or even Christian conucelling? A PhD is a rather abstract work where a sufficiently qualifier person writes about an academic subject. 'Counseling' or 'Christian Counseling' is not an academic discipline of its own. So likely this is the usual puff piece, which is then used to sell guidance books. And no, as is I don't see how the person is notable. So:delete -Eptalon (talk) 11:14, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 17:42, 11 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Chima Azubuike

Chima Azubuike (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 17:40, 4 January 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 17:40, 11 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Shoji Akimitsu

Shoji Akimitsu (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG. Could easily even be an A4 but as it's existed for 16 years I'm sending it here. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 16:49, 4 January 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Zero appearances? Not notable. ShadowBallX (talk) 02:30, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 16:49, 11 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Minoru Ueda

Minoru Ueda (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG. Could easily even be an A4 but as it's existed for 16 years I'm sending it here. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 16:48, 4 January 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Zero appearances? Not notable. ShadowBallX (talk) 02:30, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 16:48, 11 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Shinya Tamaoki

Shinya Tamaoki (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG. Could easily even be an A4 but as it's existed for 16 years I'm sending it here. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 16:47, 4 January 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Zero appearances? Not notable. ShadowBallX (talk) 02:28, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 16:47, 11 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Yusuke Amano

Yusuke Amano (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG. Could easily even be an A4 but as it's existed for 16 years I'm sending it here. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 16:46, 4 January 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 16:46, 11 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Marwanid campaigns of Edessa

Marwanid campaigns of Edessa (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Barras has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Doesn't seem to be notable per WP:GNG and en:WP:NEVENT Barras talk 10:48, 4 January 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 10:48, 11 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Marwanid offensive in Diyarbakir

Marwanid offensive in Diyarbakir (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Barras has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Doesn't seem to be a notable event per en:WP:NEVENT. Barras talk 10:47, 4 January 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 10:47, 11 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Persian Campaign (1224)

Persian Campaign (1224) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Notability for this event isn't established through reliable sources. One source is a Fandom wiki; the other is the English Wikipedia. CountryANDWestern (talk) 03:43, 4 January 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete No reliable sources in the article, nothing to show this is notable. Ravensfire (talk) 18:17, 7 January 2026 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 03:43, 11 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

March to Khuzestan (1225)

March to Khuzestan (1225) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Notability for this military action isn't shown through reliable sources. One source is a bookseller's website. The other is a master's thesis. CountryANDWestern (talk) 03:42, 4 January 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Master's thesis are generally not regarded as reliable sources, and the book site isn't helpful. Nothing to show notability of this topic. Ravensfire (talk) 18:13, 7 January 2026 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 03:42, 11 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

UC-114 Sir Syed Town D Block

UC-114 Sir Syed Town D Block (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Barras has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Doesn't seem to be notable per WP:GNG. Barras talk 16:17, 3 January 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Redirect to Faisalabad at this point. Not enough to show this or other UC's for Faisalabad are independently notable. Ravensfire (talk) 18:56, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 16:17, 10 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Recently closed deletion discussions

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. Not notable Peterdownunder (talk) 21:33, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

Sheikh Azam Yaseen

Sheikh Azam Yaseen (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Barras has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Seems to be failing WP:POLITICIAN. Barras talk 16:15, 3 January 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Does not meet WP:POLITICIAN - office is not statewide. Sources do not have significant coverage to meet WP:ANYBIO or WP:GNG. Ravensfire (talk) 18:46, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 16:15, 10 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. Not notable Peterdownunder (talk) 21:31, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

Mr. Gulua

Mr. Gulua (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 14:45, 3 January 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Not notable, no significant coverage from reliable sources.— *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 10:21, 7 January 2026 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 14:45, 10 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2026/TraceX Guard - thanks for the hint. Barras talk 10:53, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

TraceX

TraceX (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Barras has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: See enwiki AfD. Barras talk 10:24, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Quick delete -- this was deleted a couple of days ago at Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2026/TraceX Guard. CountryANDWestern (talk) 10:50, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 10:24, 17 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. --Eptalon (talk) 21:02, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

Susovan Roy

Susovan Roy (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Tanbiruzzaman has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Part of a Cross-wiki spam. The article topic or subject is not notable, little mentions in reliable sources. 🪶-TΛNBIRUZZΛMΛN (💬) 18:39, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• I didn’t notice, this was actually previously deleted many times under the title Susovan Sonu Roy, also see previous rfd Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2021/Susovan Sonu Roy.🪶-TΛNBIRUZZΛMΛN (💬) 18:50, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
•  Delete They are not a notable actor. This is Blog19 and their many socks trying to push this person, again. Even under this page title, it was deleted from en wiki in January 2025. Sources are clear w:WP:NEWSORGINDIA sponsored articles / puff pieces - the over-the-top breathless praise in them is the obvious clue here. Where are the reviews from actual reputable professional reviewers that even mention them, let alone have more than just their name? None. Because they are a bit-part actor. Delete this, protect it from recreation because of the past history here with other names and the history on en wiki. Ravensfire (talk) 19:04, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 18:39, 9 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. --Eptalon (talk) 21:00, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

Shyamkanu Mahanta

Shyamkanu Mahanta (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Barras has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Doesn't meet WP:GNG and no WP:SIGCOV. Barras talk 18:23, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Poor sources in the article, no significant coverage elsewhere.— *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 10:26, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
•  Delete Multiple junk scraper sites used as sources, no significant coverage in the other sources. Not enough to show WP:NBIO is met. Ravensfire (talk) 18:34, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 18:23, 9 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. Ternera (talk) 14:32, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

Ayyubbid Conquest of Arabia

Ayyubbid Conquest of Arabia (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Significant coverage not shown to establish notability; in the sources I can access, there is passing mention but not sigcov. Like many Ayyubbid related articles, the verifiability is not there and the conflation of one sentence in a source to a bigger article is apparent. CountryANDWestern (talk) 14:12, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

I understand the concern about standalone notability under WP:GNG. While the Ayyubid expansion into Yemen and the Hejaz is well documented in reliable secondary sources e.g. EI, Dumper, Daly & Petry it may not be treated by historians as a single, named campaign sufficient for a standalone article

I therefore support merging this content into an appropriate parent article such as Ayyubid dynasty History of Yemen or a dedicated section on Ayyubid expansion which would preserve verifiable material while avoiding synthesis concerns. ~2026-30149 (talk) 15:01, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

The article Ayyubid Conquest of Arabia was written based primarily on material already summarized in the “Ayyubid conquest of Arabia” subsection within the Ayyubid dynasty article on English Wikipedia, which itself draws on established secondary sources (e.g. Encyclopaedia of Islam, Daly & Petry, Dumper, etc.).

I understand the concern that this topic may not meet standalone notability requirements under WP:GNG, as historians generally discuss these events as part of broader Ayyubid expansion rather than as a formally named, discrete campaign.

In light of this, I support merging the content back into an appropriate parent article (such as Ayyubid dynasty or History of Yemen) rather than deletion, so that verifiable and sourced material is preserved without overstating the independence of the topic. ~2026-30149 (talk) 16:01, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

•  Delete Two big issues with a quick scan - this is not written in simple english and any of the Harvard type citations are incomplete - last name, year and page number and nothing else == essentially useless citation for most readers. That suggests that much of this has been copied and probably from en wiki with zero attibution - another issue. A deeper check showed a couple of the sources are more on Arabia as a whole. The page move in the middle of the RFD was not helpful and confusing. An article of this complexity would be better served to write on en wiki first, get it vetted and through AFC and then copied here. The overall format of the article is challenging at times. Ravensfire (talk) 17:31, 6 January 2026 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 14:12, 9 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. WP:SOFTDELETE Ternera (talk) 14:30, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

Khwarazmian-Abbasid Conflict (1225)

Khwarazmian-Abbasid Conflict (1225) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Notability for this conflict not established through reliable sources. The only source provided appears to be a research paper. CountryANDWestern (talk) 14:11, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 14:11, 9 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. Ternera (talk) 14:29, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

Template:User Tasmania

Template:User Tasmania (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unused userbox template existing in the wrong space per WP:Userboxes. I would move it to the userspace of its creator, but since it is unused other than at Category:Wikipedians in Tasmania, which is an empty cat, it's not worth the move. CountryANDWestern (talk) 12:48, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Created for a single (invalid) purpose, discussed at User talk:Esteban McKeever/Archive 2#user page creation. No issues in recreating if needed but should ideally be in userspace. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 12:51, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 12:48, 9 January 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.